my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Taken (2008)

Author Topic: Taken (2008) John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 08-15-2008 12:33 AM                     90 minutes or so of a good action flick. Get some popcorn and go along for the ride. Liam Neeson does a great job in the revenge stakes. You know what's going to happen most of the time but that doesn't matter. 4/5  |  IP: Logged Jennifer Pan THE JEN! Posts: 1219 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: Nov 2003 posted 08-19-2008 02:44 AM                        Neeson kicks butt in this. I didn't know what to expect going into it but I was pleasantly surprised. Nice action scenes but sorta slow in the beginning. Its as if Jason Bourne got old and had a teenage daughter, lite. out of 5  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 08-19-2008 06:57 AM                     Bourne lite...that's good. I was wondering why I hadn't seen any other reviews here and just found out it doesn't open until September in the USA. Look forward to it guys.  |  IP: Logged Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 08-19-2008 10:09 AM                     I actually saw it in April in Belgium !! Liked it a lot Good action movie to pass 2 or something hours  |  IP: Logged Sally Ann Burgess Expert Film Handler Posts: 120 From: Queenstown, New Zealand Registered: Apr 2008 posted 09-05-2008 03:48 AM                     I really really enjoyed this...almost like watching Jason Bourne's older and slightly sexier brother! Even the music sounded the same in parts. Short and full of action, does exactly what it says on the tin. 9/10. Watching Wall-E tomorrow for the first time. Can't wait.  |  IP: Logged Tyler Potts Expert Film Handler Posts: 159 From: Anderson, SC, USA Registered: Sep 2008 posted 10-17-2008 02:25 PM                       Pushed back to January here in the states, managed to get a copy of it last night (started looking when I saw the trailer on Body of Lies). Really enjoyed it!  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-23-2009 06:45 PM                     quote: Steve Wilson Sorry John, I was refering the posting on this board and not the world wide web. quote: Me Actually, so was I. See?  |  IP: Logged Steve Wilson Expert Film Handler Posts: 109 From: Paoli, IN, USA Registered: May 2004 posted 02-23-2009 09:55 PM                        Well, No wonder I could not find the thing. I looked hard for it, but failed to understand just how far out of date the original post is! Sorry John, I was refering the posting on this board and not the world wide web. Taken is a Mans Movie and I thought someone would have posted on the quality of the movie. It appears that the critics did not like it that well, but regular folks that went to see it gave it a good vote. Its one of those movies that the critics may have killed by themselves. I liked the movie a good bit. Action was good and the photography was just as good as any. I am like Louis Belloisy, I have been a photographer for over 25 years. I know good work when I see it!  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-18-2009 11:54 AM                        We are playing this now. I was expecting a lot from this film, because it has such enduring popularity that it just HAD to be good. And I like Liam Neeson too - he's always in quality projects - so I was ready to be greatly entertained. Not to be, though...I was severely disappointed. Everything from the basics on up is stupid: Not only is the "mom" character completely opposite of what a real mom would be, the movie doesn't even work as a thrill ride, because the whole second half is so completely preposterous that you can never get "invested" in the characters. Liam Neeson is able to find one guy at the Paris airport just from looking at a blurry cell phone picture of a reflection in a window?? Come on. He only needs to hear a couple of words (or garbled phrases) from some dude, and from that he manages to figure out where a building is, in a city where the streets might run for miles? He kills a couple of dozen people, steals a couple of cars, destroys several buildings and STILL manages to fly home right after plucking his daughter out of the bad guy's hands without so much as a few days in prison while waiting to clear his name? Not to mention all of this happens in Paris without a single law enforcement persen ever showing up? This movie takes all of those idiocies and then piles on every standard action-movie cliche in the book, such as: - The bad guys can fire all the automatic weapon shots they want but will never hit the good guy, while the good guy only needs one shot (or stab) from a gun (or knife) to vanquish any bad guy. - The bad guys will obligingly take turns and attack the good guy one at a time, giving him a chance to dispatch each of them before moving on to the next. - And finally, a demonstration of the time-honored trick of touching any two random wires under the dash of a car together to hot-wire it. I need to try that the next time I forget my keys. They could have improved this movie by having Neeson shoot his ex-wife at the airport when he gets home. I will say that I liked the sound mix, and the plot was great until just after the original bad guy got killed (I was willing to forgive the unlikely cell-phone-picture-recognition thing), so on that basis, it gets two out of five stars from me.  |  IP: Logged Jon P. Inghram Expert Film Handler Posts: 124 From: Wichita, KS USA Registered: Jan 2007 posted 04-18-2009 02:08 PM                     I just remembered something I noticed while watching this: In the night scenes that were lit with the "natural" sodium vapor lamps they had to do some pretty extreme adjustments to the white balance of the image, cranking the blue up far enough that there was a noticeable amount of noise in the shadows in the blue channel. The odd thing was that the noise had a obvious grid pattern, it wasn't just random. It was being projected on 35mm so it wasn't the projector.  |  IP: Logged Jonathan M. Crist Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 531 From: Hershey, PA, USA Registered: Apr 2000 posted 04-18-2009 03:41 PM                     What this picture really is a good second feature for the drive-ins. Short, keeps moving, and if you fall asleep and miss a few minutes it doesn't really matter. 2 stars out of 5  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.