Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Atonement (2007)

   
Author Topic: Atonement (2007)
Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-24-2007 12:21 PM      Profile for Jonathan M. Crist   Email Jonathan M. Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is a phenomenon I will never understand.

You take a contrived, overwrought soap opera.... dress it up in period clothes and British accents... and critics go ga-ga.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 12-25-2007 11:54 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was able to see ATONEMENT for free with a movie ticket that came with the PRIDE & PREJUDICE deluxe dvd set and was forced to watch it by last Saturday with a bloody cold I still have. The movie opened in a very few theatres on December 7th but it opened last Friday in only one theatre in Honolulu, the Ward 16. Since the coupon expired two days after it opened here, I was forced to see it when I was sick because I only heard good things about it. How was it? It was extremely boring and I walked out after watching it for almost an hour and a half and I agree with Jonathan Crist on this one.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-25-2007 03:31 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was tortured watching this at Showeast. It is boring, aweful and also disgusting.

=Spoiler Ahead=
There is something seriously wrong with using child rape to develop the plot of a movie.
=End of spoiler=

The only thing that could have made this watchable is if Kiera Knightly was nude during the sex scene but she is fully dressed.

1/2 star and that's only because I got free popcorn, soda and candy at the screening.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 12-30-2007 03:01 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...................SPOILERS AHEAD!............................

In the beginning was the word...

Thou shalt not bear false witness...

The sound track loudly proclaims the first theme by the clacking of a typewriter over a dark screen. We become aware thet this is a literary film, based on Ian McEwan's novel.

"What is the worst word you can possibly think of?"

Words form Briony's hobby as child playwright; Robby's mis-delivered words cause Briony to act, because of jealousy and sexual immaturity, bearing false witness after a crime is committed, leading to disasterous events. The clacking Coronas
continue their chorus of doom.

Words connect the actions through letters, and the need for atonement, through speech and writings, tortures all three characters. Atonement is thwarted until Briony, grown old, con-fesses by writing the story we have just seen, in a book. Has she finally completed her atonement, albeit too late for all?

Briony the successful author, at the film's conclusion, is played by Helen Mirin, who manages to look convincingly like the child actor playing young Briony. This is a familiar role for Ms Mirin, having played Inspector Jane Tennyson in the long running British TV series shown on PBS in the US as "Prime Suspect." As Inspector Tennyson, she often indicts and prosecutes perverts and child molestors; in "Atonement" she causes suffering to the innocent man she had a crush on as a child.

I like the crisp portrayal of British upper-class life, photographed outdoors in sunshine and indoors and at night with
much attention to shadows and darkness. Being somewhat an Anglophile, I find refreshing British speech and historical re-creations, as in "The Forsyte Saga" and "Brideshead Revisited"
shown on Masterpiece Theater on PBS. I love seeing the carriages, costumes, old cars and mansions.

But I didn't like the use of camera shake and mis-focus to blurr the sex scene, although the director probably wanted to convey Briony's shock at witnesing the lovers' tryst and not cmprehending their love. To me it appeared clumsy. And I was initially puzzled by some scenes being shown twice, until at the end, I understood they were shown once as witnessed by a child, and again as mature Briony wrote them in her book of atonement.

Joe Wright and his art director created a massive inferno in depicting the chaos at Dunkirk. I have always thought of Dunkirk as a heroic rescue by a vast armada of civilian pleasure and fishing boats, of the British and French armies ambushed there. I had only seen newsreel footage from the air.
But "Atonement" showed none of that. Instead the film shows undisciplined men, many wounded and dying, and others drunk or without hope of rescue, as morale and chains of command broke down.

And the scenes of Robert, the housekeeper's son, taken from university to prison and then wandering behind German lines to Dunkirk, remind me of similar wandering in "The Longest Day" another anti-heroic war film.

I liked this film, though I think the Dunkirk episode, great as it is in art direction and cinematography, is capable of forming an entirely other film. I found "Atonement" absorbing but over-long.

Monday, December24, 2007 at Kew Gardens Cinema 1:00 PM

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-30-2007 08:49 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Far from being a disappointment, I found this film to be captivating. It actually felt rather contemporary to me, despite the period setting. I found it captured the confusion of adolesence and approaching puberty with all the mystery and terror that it can elicit. Although time play is becoming a bit of a cliche in cinema these days, it still managed to work here. A bravura piece of filmmaking

Viewed at Laemmle Playhouse 7 in Pasadena 12/26/07. Surprisingly, this film was FLAT, but was well projected with OK SRD.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Burt
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: San Francisco, CA, United States
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 01-07-2008 12:24 PM      Profile for Paul Burt   Email Paul Burt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In general, an excellent film, well acted and directed. The six minute long tracking shot of the evacuation at Dunkirk was extraordinarily intense and believable. 4.5/5.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Burgess
Film Handler

Posts: 24
From: norfolk, va / usa
Registered: Jul 2006


 - posted 01-08-2008 07:13 AM      Profile for Aaron Burgess   Email Aaron Burgess   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
old women love this movie. i do not.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-08-2008 09:29 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At 68 years old, I usually like this kind of movie, but I totally disliked this film. The only thing I liked about this movie was the music and I downloaded it from iTunes to my new iPod touch and I am enjoying it

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-21-2008 12:50 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That was Vanessa Redgrave, not Helen Mirren (correct spelling).

I was intrigued by the subtitles with a grey transparent background. Presumably this was to fix some cases of subtitles being unreadable on bright scenes. It seemed to work OK.

I enjoyed the movie, perhaps unabashedly (despite having gotten two prints of it, neither of which were particularly great).

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-22-2008 08:53 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul Thomas Anderson tells a story about how he snuck into a second-run theater to watch BOOGIE NIGHTS, and was horrified the presentation. The print was damaged, the anamorphic lens was out of alignment, the sound was mono, etc. At first he was really upset. But then he thought to himself, "Does the movie still work? If it doesn't, that means I haven't done my job as a filmmaker."

I think this is true. If a movie can't still be enjoyed, no matter how bad the print may be, then it's probably not a good movie to begin with.

That being said, I don't think even a pristine 70mm print of ATONEMENT would make it worth watching.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.