Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Hairspray (2007)

   
Author Topic: Hairspray (2007)
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 07-20-2007 04:54 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Megaplex 17 at Jordan Commons, Sandy, UT
AUDITORIUM: 14
PRESENTATION: Dolby Digital Cinema/THX
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None [Cool]
RATING: Two stars (out of four)

This may be the chickiest chick flick ever made. I about walked out twice.

This 105 minute barrage of uppitiness contains approximately 17,562 dance numbers. The "plot" is merely sub-fodder to get from one dance number to another. Just like porn.

Travolta is cartoonish. I don't know if it's supposed to be a running joke that a guy has to play that part or something...if it is, I didn't get it. It was just stupid.

The girls in the audience giggled and cheered and generally made me want to never have sex again. The two stars is for production value really. It was well shot and had a great soundtrack. Probably the best done movie I've hated since "Chicago".

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 07-21-2007 12:07 AM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Viewed at Regal's Edwards Bakersfield 14, screen #8, 35mm SRD.

Presentation: Excellent projection and sound. Flawless presentation.

THis was one of the most purely enjoyable times I've had at a movie in a while. Yes, I've seen some better films, but none this joyful. It's a very upbeat, sunny film that nonetheless shows an ugliness beneath the surface of nostalgia for the "good old innocent days." The casting was spot-on, the dancing flowed well wirth an exhuberence rarely seen anymore. I was a little sad at some of the cuts from the stage show. Three of my favorite songs were either eliminated (the whole prison sequence, truncated, "It Takes Two," or banished to the end credits "I'm a Big Girl Now." Still, a true delight that makes up for a derivitave summer (and despite its history, this didn't seem derivitave).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 07-21-2007 06:12 PM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Viewed at AMC Lennox 24 Theatre 12 on a 60+' Torus screen. (Looks great...sounds just OK.)

I agree with Paul...this is one of the more delightful films I've seen in a long while. Nice to see a non-sequel, too.

Performances are very very fine across the board. Way too much is made of Travolta...he is not the main character in this film at all. Nikki Blonsky is a powerhouse, and certainly equal to Ricki Lake in the original. Michelle Pfeiffer is a great villain, and Walken/Travolta make a great couple and have a very nice dance. Queen Latifah is just perfect as Mother Maybelle.

This is the most energetic movie I think I've ever seen. It just keeps rolling and rolling along with one strong musical number after another. The songs, however, sound very much like the Ashman/Menken songs in LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS.

I was disappointed in the sound mix of this film just as I was with DREAMGIRLS, and I think I figured out why. Blame it on CHICAGO. CHICAGO has such an incredible orchestral mix, especially heavy on the percussion. DREAMGIRLS and HAIRSPRAY are mixed a bit more on the bass side with the drums more in the background. I think CHICAGO sounds bigger and brighter than the newer musicals.

A fun experience, especially for those of us who grew up in this era. Looked like us 50+ folks were in the majority here. More than a few grey-haired ladies dancing during the credit music!

The director of this film (Adam Shankman) has one of the strangest credits I've ever seen. For the film CASPER, he is credited with "animation ghost references".

[ 07-22-2007, 12:46 PM: Message edited by: Mark Lensenmayer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Shane Cooper
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 232
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 07-22-2007 06:27 PM      Profile for Shane Cooper   Email Shane Cooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Watched at Rave Colonel Glenn 18, House 17, DLP presentation

My wife dragged me to this movie as I had no real interest in watching it. However, I enjoyed it and my wife really enjoyed it. It was nice to see something fresh in this summer of recycle, (I realize that it is an adaptation of a musical that was an adaptation of a movie), great music and a positive message.

based on the gross that far exceeded any of the expectations I saw, alot of others liked it as well.
[thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-24-2007 07:13 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I felt the oogies just workin on the projector standing next to this film today... Somehow Travolta as a big fat sing'n woman gives me the creeps...

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 07-30-2007 01:50 PM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fun Movie. Christopher Walken and John Travolta doing a song and dance number together is hilarious!

4.5 out of 5 stars.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 08-04-2007 07:01 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark; I now call him John Revolta. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-04-2007 04:31 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
(though it was "John Revolting") [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-06-2007 01:40 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Finally got around to seeing this tonight after much "you should watch this, even if only for the sound mix" nudging.

Like others I thought the whole Travolta in drag thing was going to be stupid and unnecessary. By the time Travolta had some screen time, I just didn't care. This movie is just fun with amazing energy. I thoroughly enjoyed myself from beginning to end.

Sound-wise this flick has a PHENOMENAL sound mix! I ran the fader at 8 and it was crisp, clean and rich without a hint of ear fatigue. If anyone wasn't blown away by the sound in the auditorium, that sound system needs some work because the mix was magnificent.

I was going to rate this movie 4 out of 5 stars for content, but the sound mix was so well done that I am giving it 5 out of 5 stars because it really made the movie for me.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-06-2007 06:13 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A double feature with Moulin Rouge anyone? [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-06-2007 11:53 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow, a 5-star review from Brad. I think this is a first.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-06-2007 09:59 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike, watch it yourself and tell me if you don't catch yourself grinning through the entire movie.

Of course under your own logic, you may not want to book the film, because movies that I think are crap do big business. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-08-2007 05:46 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ran two shows of it today, and watched some of it from up in the box. It's not really my sort of film; too fast and too loud, but I have to say that the picture looked good; almost like one o the 'new' Technicolor dye prints made a few years ago. Was it a 4k D.I? It looked much sharper than 'The Incredibles', which I ran before it, and which I don't remember looking like it did today the last time we had it.

The house was about three-quarters full at 14:20, but for the 20:15 show we only got about six; I wouldn't have put it on in that slot. It got a surprising number of older people in for the 14:20 show.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-10-2007 08:23 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
Mike, watch it yourself and tell me if you don't catch yourself grinning through the entire movie.
We are playing this right now, and yes I did watch it. I guess I didn't like it THAT much, but I did enjoy it a lot more than I was thinking I would. For one thing, it was a lot funnier than I was expecting -- always a plus for a comedy fan like me. Nikki Blonsky is a real find...without her, the movie wouldn't have been nearly as good. And Travolta, he was hilarious - he should get a best actor Oscar nom. I thought Christopher Walken added a lot, too.

The songs rate high on the "catchy" meter...I can't get a few of them to stop playing in my head. And, agreed that the sound mix is excellent. I would have liked a little more low-end, but that's just my taste.

Overall, a solid 8 out of 10 from me. My wife has watched it twice; she gives it a 9.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.