|
|
 
|
|
Author
|
Topic: 1408 (2007)
|
David Stambaugh
Film God
Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 06-24-2007 06:49 PM
The only thing that made this watchable for me was John Cusack's performance. The scares weren't scary, really more silly most of the time. Nice twists at the end though. What the hell was Samuel L. Jackson doing in this? Cha-ching!
1.5 stars out of 5, and that's only because JC was trying hard.
Regal 15 in Shelbyville, ok presentation but damn that's an ugly-looking print.
I got there early and decided to check out the open captioned showing of Ocean's 13, just to see if it was using the DTS system or whatever for the captions (because I am a dork). Boy was that show ever messed up. After FirstLook, the automation went haywire. Film started, masking changed, lights came down, there was picture, but then suddenly the sound went to non-sync and the masking changed back again and the house lights came up. FirstLook started running again on top of the film image. It looked like the film start was completely automated. Nobody was aware of the problem until it was reported.
(edited for a spelling correction)
[ 06-24-2007, 10:28 PM: Message edited by: David Stambaugh ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-11-2007 01:02 PM
quote: Dennis Benjamin
PG-13 "horror" films are a complete waste of time.
That's not true.
The problem is Hollywood, in general, just doesn't know how to make horror movies worth a damn anymore -regardless of MPAA rating.
It is actually possible to make a scary movie without lots of bloody gore, on-screen graphic violence and swaying, naked tits (although that seems to be the standard for any "dying teenager movie").
Film makers need to pursue a sort of "back to basics" approach. They need to study Hitchcock. More basic than that, they need to study the concepts of building characters the audience will actually give a damn about and establishing dangerous conflicts for that character. When you care about the character, see that he is in danger and then not really know how he's going to get out of it alive -then you have something resembling dramatic tension. Very simple idea. And the vast majority of "horror" movies fail miserably in trying to deliver that.
When you have some cardboard cutout stereotype blood priss with breast implants stupidly getting herself into bad situations, the audience isn't going to be on her side. They're just waiting for the slasher to cut her to ribbons. The movie just ends up functioning like a damned porn video. Instead of waiting to see a couple of people screw, the viewer just waits for someone to get killed.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Or at least watch some classic ghost movies like NIGHT OF THE DEMON and THE HAUNTING to learn how to use sound, or POLTERGEIST to observe how to keep an audience on their seat's edges.
Printer-friendly view of this topic