Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Good German

   
Author Topic: The Good German
Paul Burt
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: San Francisco, CA, United States
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 01-07-2007 11:32 AM      Profile for Paul Burt   Email Paul Burt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This film's been getting terrible reviews (except from Peter Travers in Rolling Stone), but I thought it was one of the best of the year. The ultimate WWII film noir, it's cynical and disturbing, sort of the anti-Casablanca. Good acting, great period cinematography in b&w (although occasionally washed-out, probably to match the look of the old 1945 footage used as background is some of the process shots). Really well written. No upbeat happy Hollywood ending, that's for sure. It clearly pissed off a lot of critics, not a bad sign. Go see it.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard P. May
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 243
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 01-07-2007 05:38 PM      Profile for Richard P. May   Email Richard P. May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having worked in film preservation for many years, I have to comment on the "1940s" look of this picture. Lenses, film stock, processing, etc. from that period and earlier were infinitely better than represented in THE GOOD GERMAN. This picture was made to look like a bad multi-generation print from a dupe negative.
If we were to deliver a print that looked like this to a customer, I doubt that we would get any repeat business.

RPM

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 01-12-2007 01:07 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Richard, in what sense is the picture flawed? I didn't think that this movie looked bad at all. I don't have a trained eye, but it didn't seem any more multi-generational than any other movie that's released today. I don't think that was the intent, either. The one thing that bothered me about this movie stylistically is that the music, at least, seemed to be in stereo. That doesn't make much sense.

As for the movie on the whole, it was a really interesting experiment, which proves once again that Steven Soderbergh is one of the most versatile directors of all time. People keep referring to this as an R-rated CASABLANCA, and it is, almost to a fault. But the key difference is that CASABLANCA had a much better script. That's ultimately the problem with THE GOOD GERMAN, and why it disappoints.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard P. May
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 243
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 01-15-2007 10:07 AM      Profile for Richard P. May   Email Richard P. May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike,
Not to get into a long diatribe about my opinion of the "look", I suggest you take a look at a good print of CASABLANCA, or almost any major studio B&W film of the period. You could even use the latest DVDs of that picture, or the 1938 MARIE ANTOINETTE for a good example.
The current master film material of MARIE A. was made a couple of years ago from the original 1938 camera negative. The quality of the image, in sharpness, proper contrast, etc. almost jumps off the screen.
THE GOOD GERMAN is soft and over-contrasty.
There of course can be differences of opinion, and I don't think either of us want to beat this one to death.

RPM

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-15-2007 06:37 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to mention that the fades and dissolves all looked wrong....

Nonetheless, I enjoyed the film, though it seems to have received generally poor reviews.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.