Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | my password | register | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Man of the Year

   
Author Topic: Man of the Year
Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-14-2006 12:51 AM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Starts out great, but turns into a semi serious drama about half way. I would have liked more scenes like when Dobbs dressed up in the colonial outfit. Overall, not bad but I was expecting a few more laughs.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 10-14-2006 11:19 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ugh... A bunch of jokes too dull to be funny and too obviously topical to make you think. A lot of acting in which the players look as unconvinced as the audience. And then a forced drama that's so lumberingly awkward it summoned my bladder to cue me away from the tackiness.

Universal clearly didn't step out to make this. Political humor should be sharp & constantly redefining the spin on current topics, but this film just kind of sat on big government's Summer generalities & threw out reminders of the state of things. All of the media in the movie was straight out of Universal's NBC catalog, a great nod to how much the film is willing to spend on looking authentic, which I don't think ever managed to convince the audience I was sitting in with on Saturday night to follow the dreadfully-forced story. Not too many laughs either. Were there any jokes coming out of Robin Williams that one couldn't have had sent to their cell phone via text message? His charming vulgarity never got used. Louis Black appeared to have the studio's leash tied directly to the back of his throat. And, once again, Walken seemed to have been advised to avoid the slightest funny improv under penalty of a sequel.

A lot of what gets said in the debate scene got muffled out of context when they manically switched over to monitoring it on TV. Too much music in the surrounds, too.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2018 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.