Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Fantastic Four (2005)

   
Author Topic: Fantastic Four (2005)
Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 07-08-2005 08:08 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm going to make this quick and simple. I was only looking for one thing, that this did not suck ass like the 1994 version. And it didn't, it was a pretty decent film. Not any where near Batman Begins, behind Sin City the best comic book movie ever. I would have to say Fantastic 4 sits some where around 7th on the list of comic book films.

[thumbsup] [thumbsup] [thumbsup] out of [thumbsup] [thumbsup] [thumbsup] [thumbsup] [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Greco
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1180
From: Plant City, FL
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 07-08-2005 06:08 PM      Profile for Richard Greco   Email Richard Greco   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very cool movie. Chris Evans provided great comic relief. Julian McMahon is a great villan although he's better on Nip/Tuck. IT is a great flick with lots of action. Enjoyable all around. I can't wait for Into The Blue to see Jessica Alba in a tight bikini.

Movie 4/5
Jessica Alba 5/5

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-08-2005 11:48 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I know nothing about the Fantastic Four, but was pleased to see that this involved people thrown into their powers and spent most of the movie trying to make the powers go away. A nice change.

Not great, but certainly worth a watch. 3 out of 5

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 07-09-2005 03:55 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Century 20 at Jordan Creek, West Des Moines, IA
AUDITORIUM: 10
PRESENTATION: Dolby Digital/THX
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None [Cool]
RATING: Four fantastic stars (out of four)

"Transporter 2"?!? When was there a "Transporter 1"?!? (Don't answer...I'll check IMDB after I write this.)

Here's an example of what I have to deal with in my life...The "Bad News Bears" redux trailer plays, and Wife #1, who thinks nothing of babbling at regular talk volume through the trailers at any movie, says "That doesn't look anything like the Brooke Shields version."

Poor Tatum.

The major critics all seem to hate this one. I don't see why...Sure it's not deep or brilliant, but it's FUN! I had a blast watching it. The action was cool, the soundtrack decent, and it didn't take itself too seriously (it's pretty funny, actually.) Loved all the characters. I may very well see it again this weekend. General audience reaction was extremely positive.

Also noticed the X-Men 3 poster in the lobby. Might have to fire up the X-Men DVD tonight. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 07-11-2005 06:02 AM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. This was a good, summertime fun flick. I think it had a great mix of characters. Saw it at the AMC Hamilton 24, which always does a great showing. The audience was packed and actually applauded at the end of the film (which only improved the little treat before the credits rolled.) [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-11-2005 10:14 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
3 1/2 out of 5

Perfect summer movie, not a cinematic masterpiece but a fun 2 hours. Maybe could have shaved 5 or 10 minutes off the "human interest story" of "The Thing" in the middle, but other than that it was very well done.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 07-11-2005 02:38 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did anyone else look at The Thing in his hat and trench coat and expect him to whip out a pair of sais?

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: Boulder Creek, CA.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 07-24-2005 02:06 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ben Grim: Midle-Aged mutant ninja thing...

Anywho, just saw this the other night at the Regal Cinemas 14 in Turlock. Good technicians maintain the equipment, lazy projectionists run it...But here's my take on the movie:

The human tourch was hillarious. Great comedy there.
I didn't really like a lot of the dialog and action, especially on the part of the villian. It was very cheesey.
The best visual effects were the thing. The rest pretty well sucked.

2.5/5

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Harrison
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 239
From: Harwood Heights, Illinois, USA
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 07-28-2005 07:30 PM      Profile for Robert Harrison   Email Robert Harrison   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, so far, most have given this film a FAIR rating. I didn't think it was any great shakes, yet when it was over, I didn't resent having seen it like, say, "Bewitched."

It did seem to me that the script was written back in the 70's for a TV movie and rediscovered recently. (The music score seemed to be from the same source, also.) I kept waiting for the film to "begin." That scene on the bridge was dumb. Ben Grimm started all the ruckus and eventually the crowd is cheering him and the others! And why, other than for titilation, does Sue Storm have to take her clothes off to get through the crowd? Two seconds later, Reed and Johnny are right beside her, so what was the benefit of her going invisible?

Overall, the characters were one-dimensional as hell. Johnny was full of himself. Ben was a hard-ass. Sue was doing the old "If you want this ass, you must kiss it first" routine. And Reed was a DORK! I know there are fans of the comics who will say that everyone was "in character" according to their magazine originals, but even they can't agree that Reed should be a dork!

I wish more comic book adaptations would go the route of 1989's "Batman" and forget about spending most or the whole of the film dealing with origin stories (although, "Batman Begins" did a good job of just that). Just get on with it! And quit worrying about having a sophomoric "joke" every five minutes.

The "X-Men" movies still rule the roost.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.