my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Star Trek: Borg Invasion 4D - Special Venue

Author Topic: Star Trek: Borg Invasion 4D - Special Venue Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 04-03-2005 12:06 PM                     I'm typing this review from McCarran Intl Airport in Las Vegas; my flight back to Oklahoma leaves in about half an hour. So I'm bored, aiight!? Anyway, this new Star Trek ride thingie was on my to-do list while in LV for the 2005 International Sign Association convention. For anyone who has visited the Las Vegas Hilton, the Borg Invasion 4D attraction is a new ride added to the original Klingon Encounter ride still available. The Klingon Encounter ride is a domed screen motion simulator while the Borg Invasion 4D ride is dual screen 3D. You have one screen above you and one in front. The seats move around to suggest motion, but don't give quite the feeling of the Klingon ride. The new "4D" aspect added is the seat prodding you or blowing wind in your head during certain parts of the show. Other stuff is blown at you as well. I'm not going to get into the specifics of it, but the experience in context of the Borg is pretty creepy. Like the Klingon Encounter ride, a number of cast members from the Star Trek saga make appearances in this one. Robert Picardo plays his holographic character "Doctor" from the Voyager TV series. Kate Mulgrew makes a brief appearance as Captain Janeway as the Voyager tries to rescue you from the clutches of the Borg. Alice Krige (currently on the HBO series "Deadwood") gets the most 3D work replaying her role as the Borg Queen, from the First Contact movie. Overall, the ride experience is pretty good but not great. The 4D elements make the difference, otherwise the whole thing would have been pretty lame. You get a live acted out scenario where crew members hustle you through a couple hallways as the space station you're on is under attack from the Borg. That's just a lead up to the ride. It's not as well thought out as the Klingon Encounter -where they make it seem as though you've been beamed aboard the Enterprise. Image quality on both rides isn't as good as an IMAX or IMAX 3D movie. If you're a Star Trek fan, you'll really like all the attention to detail, particularly the museum leading up the rides. You can get a two ride ticket for, um, $37.50 I think. That gets you onto both attractions as many times as you like. What makes it even more fun is if you slam a few drinks in Quarks Lounge and then go ride some more. Just don't act beligerent to the ticketing people.  |  IP: Logged Daniel Alt Expert Film Handler Posts: 111 From: Lakewood, OH, USA Registered: Mar 2004 posted 04-04-2005 07:39 PM                     Too funny... we just missed each other... I was in the airport the night before you left, and got bumped from my flight. I slept in the terminal, and then went and wandered around the strip all day, while you were IN the terminal typing. Then after you flew out, I came back and caught my red-eye. The strip is even more surreal when you haven't slept for 36 hours. (To add some vague relevance to the forum, if not the thread, I saw "Sin City" at the UA next to the MGM Grand, and was impressed with the movie, although it seemed slightly out of focus)  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 04-11-2005 06:51 PM                     That's pretty funny, I seriously considered watching "Sin City" at that UA theater, but follow through with it (there just wasn't enough time). We were staying nearby at Excalibur. I also didn't know if the UA theater was any good. They do have a decent sign though. It was novel enough being in Sin City when "Sin City" opened. I must have walked more than 20 miles out there. On the upside, I donated platelets at the Oklahoma Blood Institute a few days later and all that exercise shaved a bunch of points off my cholesterol level.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Jorgenson Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1002 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Feb 2005 posted 05-06-2005 10:27 PM                        quote: Bobby Henderson I also didn't know if the UA theater was any good. I saw Instinct there in June 1999 and was very unimpressed with the presentation (I don't remember specifics as this was almost six years ago). I have not seen a film there since, so they may have beefed up their presentation. re: Borg Invasion, I did see that last April (2004) and I also saw the Klingon Encounter both then and back in June 1999. I enjoyed the Borg show, but it didn't have the same "amazement" factor as the first time watching the Klingon Encouter - getting "beamed", but the double screen 3D was interesting. All these 4D shows (It's Tough to Be a Bug, Honey I Shrunk the Audience, Shrek 4D... etc) that use whatever gimmicks they use, are fun while on vacation, but I don't think I'd enjoy the "gimmicks" in regular features like films such as The Tingler tried in the late 50s.  |  IP: Logged Paul Mayer Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under! Posts: 3836 From: Albuquerque, NM Registered: Feb 2000 posted 05-06-2005 11:38 PM                        Judging from recent comments of friends, the UA on the Strip still sucks presentation wise, just like the rest of the UA locations here. Typical 'Vegas projection standards--scratched and dirty prints on opening day.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 05-08-2005 12:42 AM                     At least the theater has a pretty expensive sign -not nearly as expensive as the El Capitan Theater sign in Los Angeles, but certainly not cheap either. So what is the offical name of that theater? The United Artists Parking?  |  IP: Logged Paul Mayer Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under! Posts: 3836 From: Albuquerque, NM Registered: Feb 2000 posted 05-08-2005 12:45 AM                        One would think so, looking at that expensive sign, ey? AFAIK, the name is "United Artists Showcase 8."  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 05-08-2005 09:22 PM                     "11:55, 2:55" = "gay-assed" showtimes. What's wrong with adding 5 minutes and calling it "noon" and "3 o'clock"? Never could figure it out why theatres have these ":55" showtimes-so retarded! Now these are REG operated complexes. They have Christie equipment here.  |  IP: Logged Chase Hanson Expert Film Handler Posts: 172 From: San Diego, CA Registered: Oct 2004 posted 05-09-2005 03:51 AM                     quote: Bobby Henderson So what is the offical name of that theater? The United Artists Parking? Apparently you cant read very well. United Artists Denny's Parking Entrance. Now what I want to know is how did Denny get his own parking entrance to the United Artist theater, and why do they have a big ole sign advertising it.  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 05-09-2005 09:28 AM                     Actually, "United Artists Parking" is apt, con sidering the theatre itself is stuck in a corner of the actual parking lot.  |  IP: Logged Kelly Skaggs Film Handler Posts: 68 From: Springdale UT Registered: Jul 2003 posted 05-09-2005 08:00 PM                        The good part about that theater is Fatburger is right next door.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Jorgenson Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1002 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Feb 2005 posted 05-13-2005 03:13 PM                        quote: Never could figure it out why theatres have these ":55" showtimes-so retarded! For an 8-plex like this one, I agree... but when I worked at a 21-plex with digital video (instead of slides) playing during intermission... those video projectors started on a timer, and for good presentation, I needed to start the film projector when the video presentation ended, so having a film start every five min. was necessary (granted there always ended up being a double up or two somewhere, and one of them would have a "stand-by" screen until I could get there).  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.