Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Be Cool

   
Author Topic: Be Cool
Don Anderson
Master Film Handler

Posts: 312
From: West Bend, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 03-04-2005 02:04 AM      Profile for Don Anderson   Email Don Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Be really coooool and skip this one. 2 hours of nothingness. You would think that with all the stars and musical talent in this film, that it be viewable. Think again, this is pure.... [bs] I actually walked out, and went to my office to rap up the end of the week paperwork. I also managed to teardown a print, before attempting to watch the end of Be Cool. Just for fun think of the pocket change each person will make from this film. I can't see it generating any revenue, and then divide that by all the talent starring in the film. Pocket change. Ugh. Pass this like bad gas!!! [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Jared Foley
Film Handler

Posts: 22
From: Madison, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 03-04-2005 04:19 AM      Profile for Jared Foley   Email Jared Foley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too many pointless scenes to count. Some parts I wanted to like, but the rest killed it. Great disappointment. And did anyone feel like Vince Vaughn's character kept changing from "wannabe black" as it was scripted, and Benicio del Toro as "Fenster" in "The Usual Suspects"? I kept thinking this the whole time... any thoughts?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-04-2005 04:52 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
One word...boring! At least this film had SOME redeeming value to it unlike the mega-turds Spanglish and Winn Dixie. (Translation: I didn't want to slit my wrists before the show was over, I was just extremely B O R E D ! ! ! ! !)

 |  IP: Logged

Rich Granata
Film Handler

Posts: 61
From: Bethlehem PA USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 03-04-2005 12:37 PM      Profile for Rich Granata   Email Rich Granata   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It WAS boring. I can see it making money this weekend just because there are absolutely NO decent movies out right now. Not for my age group anyway.

I loved the Rock (as always) and Vince Vaughn saved this film in so many scenes. Other than that, it was a big waste.

***I think they spoiled the girl's songs. Way overproduced music is just not that attractive to me. By the end, the music was awful...oh and..Steven Tyler is a bad actor.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 03-04-2005 11:32 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked it! [thumbsup]

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-04-2005 11:56 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,

Agreed.. This films BLOWS. With the casting, you'd think it woudl at least be tolerable.. but NOOOOOO... Hollywood has, once again, insulted the intelligence of the average movie-goer with a film chock full of big names and no freekin plot!

It's no wonder people wait until the DVD is released anymore.. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 03-05-2005 04:37 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Century 20 at Jordan Creek, West Des Moines, IA
AUDITORIUM: 9
PRESENTATION: Dolby Digital/THX
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: More streaking than a Windex commercial
RATING: 2 1/2 stars

**WARNING** Review contains detailed plot information that may be considered spoilers, or outright sarcasm

John Travolta returns as Chili Palmer, the shylock gone movie mogul. Danny DeVito makes a cameo, as do about a dozen jokes from the first movie. That's where the similarities end.

The script is completely devoid of the cleverness that made "Get Shorty" so worthwhile. The good news is the extremely bad parts are at the beginning, and it actually gets funnier as it goes. The Rock steals every scene he's in. If that cowboy music video appears as an extra on the DVD in full length form, I am SO buying it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.