Film-Tech Cinema Systems
  Home     Products     Store     Forum     Warehouse     Contact Us    
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » ALIEN: the directors cut (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: ALIEN: the directors cut
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000

- posted 11-01-2003 07:20 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Depending on who you talk to, this movie either blows or is great. And that is coming from people who are old enough to remember this movie!

I saw this last night, decent presentation, but 20 minutes of pre show (cinemark).

There were only about 15 people in the audience, surprising that people do not come to this show.

This is the first time I caught this on the big screen. I wasn't old enough the first time around. The chest burster scene is surprisingly effective when it is 400 times larger than my tv screen is.

I was in heaven. I loved the changes, but didn't like the crap code that kept popping up. Why put it on this movie? It will be on DVD in a month, who cares anyway? STOP WITH THE CODE!!!

So yeah, I loved it on the giant screen. Worth the time involved.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged
Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002

- posted 11-01-2003 11:46 AM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I haven't seen the director's cut. I might rent the DVD. But one of the worst things about the VHS age is great movies cut down to size and unappreciated by people who missed them in the theater. Also sequels tend to dilute the power of the original in several movie franchises. Can you watch Matrix 1 and Morpheus's ramblings with a straight face anymore after you have seen Reloaded? Or for those who caught Nightmare On Elm Street on video after Freddy became a standup comic. Lethal Weapon no longer has the same intensity for me after watching the terrible 3 and half terrible half good 4. At least with DVDs, the sound and picture quality is better on the big tv screens.

As far as Alien, the only reason why Aliens is a lot more popular with the younger kids is that it is primarily an action movie that doesnt get as dated as Alien 1 that derived most of its horror from the audience not knowing what to expect. It doesn't help that many movies since the early 80s have ripped off the original Alien design and let's not even mention the inferior sequels starting with Alien 3 that really reduced the awe factor for this creature.

I watched the original Alien in 70MM blowup around the age of 11 and it was one of the best movie experiences I ever had. It is hard to explain how immensely gripping this movie was for those who have seen this movie later on VHS. Not only did we have a bigger picture, but the sense of suspense of what part of the creature was going to be revealed next, was the best part. Also it wasn't common back then for female action stars. The movie might appear slow now because we already know everything about the creature.

Anyway, if you haven't seen this in a theater, I would say it's worth a viewing.

 |  IP: Logged
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

- posted 11-01-2003 12:18 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the original "Alien" in 70mm 6-track Dolby, at the Edwards Big Newport. What a memorable moviegoing experience.

 |  IP: Logged
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

- posted 11-01-2003 09:08 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw a perfect presentation of a 70mm print in Rochester at the Loews Pittsford 3 theatre. Seeing it on video can never compare!

 |  IP: Logged
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999

- posted 11-02-2003 12:57 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well I just ran the "Directors Cut" and the transfer SUCKED! I actually got complaints about the lateral jitter. Same jitter on either projector and the previews didn't have it so it is in the print...particularly reel-1...since much of this film is hand-held camera work, they could have gotten away with it but the titles need to stay put!

Our attendance would have doubled if they had issued it in 70mm (and the jitter wouldn't have been there).

Steve

 |  IP: Logged
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99

- posted 11-02-2003 12:35 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Haven't seen it, donno if I will. Saw it in 70mm at the Woodfield Theatre back when it was first released. Personally, I would rather remember that experience over a new 35mm version, especially if the prints are crap. And on top of that there is that awful crapcode to endure.

Dave.....SHAME SHAME on you for even setting foot in a Sin-a-mark [thumbsdown] location. SLC has many finer places to see a film that that. You deserved the 20 min. of crap you got before the show!

Does anyone know what lab made the prints? I remember the 70mm as being absolutely flawless and only one other film "pulled me in" like Alien did and that was L.O.A.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged
Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002

- posted 11-03-2003 07:51 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Deluxe did the 70MM's prints. Your right Mark those prints looked great.

I saw "Alien" in 70MM on the curved screen at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood. During the first few days at that theatre they had some of the large props in the forcourt of the theatre. They removed them after someone set one of them on fire. Back in the early 80's , we ran a double feature of "Alien" and "Close Encounters...." both in 70MM at the Picwood Theatre. And a decade later ran "Alien" again in 70MM at the Odeon Theatre in Westwood, CA.

 |  IP: Logged
Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000

- posted 11-03-2003 01:18 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't have a choice on the location. It was the only one that was close to my daughters house and I needed to pick her up immediately after the show. Yes I deserve the 20 minutes.. never again.. I like Larry Millers megaplexes myself.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001

- posted 11-03-2003 01:54 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave Williams wrote:
quote:
There were only about 15 people in the audience, surprising that people do not come to this show.
Hmmm. Could this be a "Salt Lake City/Mormon church/R-rated film" thing? Sounds like 1979 all over again.

Alien had what 20th Century-Fox considered a smash opening in its original run, though according to some press the company was disappointed with grosses in Salt Lake City.

"Invasion Of A Box-Office Smash," Los Angeles Times, May 30, 1979:

For the first four days of release at 91 theatres, "Alien" grossed $3,522,581. That averages out to $38,709 per theater -- for four days, which is phenomenal.

[By the end of the opening weekend, Fox] said the film had set more than 145 different individual box-office records, including best gross ever for a theater, best weekend, and best Friday night.

There are other ways to spot a hit film besides arithmetic. Outside the Egyptian Theater at 8 p.m. Monday the line twisted around Hollywood Blvd. more than 200-people deep, with some waiting to buy tickets for the 10:30 p.m. show.

It was the same everywhere around the country, from Kansas City, Phoenix and Peoria to Dallas, Detroit and Louisville. There appears to be only two soft spots: Chicago, where the film was playing at seven theatres, and Salt Lake City.

Ashley Boone, senior vice president for domestic marketing at Fox, explained the somewhat disappointing grosses from Chicago as part of the city's paralysis following the tragic air crash [days earlier]. As for Salt Lake City, the Mormon church, which Boone said holds great sway over the way people spend their entertainment dollars, had not yet made a statement on the film.

But then, this could be nothing more than nationwide movie theatre attendance dropping off due to Halloween falling on a weekend.

*****

I saw the "Director's Cut" re-release version this weekend. I was disappointed, like many of you have expressed, that it wasn't presented in 70mm as it was back in its original release. I enjoyed seeing the movie in a theatre with an audience again nonetheless.

I can't resist not chiming in on some of these 70mm remarks. [Smile]

Pravin Ratnam wrote:
quote:
I watched the original Alien in 70MM blowup around the age of 11 and it was one of the best movie experiences I ever had.
David Stambaugh wrote:
quote:
I saw the original "Alien" in 70mm 6-track Dolby, at the Edwards Big Newport. What a memorable moviegoing experience.
John Pytlak wrote:
quote:
I saw a perfect presentation of a 70mm print in Rochester. Seeing it on video can never compare.
Steve Guttag wrote:
quote:
Our attendance would have doubled if they had issued it in 70mm.
Mark Gulbrandsen wrote:
quote:
Saw it in 70mm at the Woodfield Theatre
Bill Gabel wrote:
quote:
I saw "Alien" in 70MM on the curved screen at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood.
To add to this nostalgic thread, I'd like to mention a link to a list I put together of the original 70mm engagements of Alien. It's a work-in-progress; about 90 percent of the first-wave 70mm engagements are accounted for. Enjoy the flashback!

http://www.in70mm.com/news/2003/70mm_release/alien_openings.htm

 |  IP: Logged
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

- posted 11-03-2003 03:16 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "Pittsford Triplex" you mentioned is the same as the "Loews Pittsford 3" I mentioned in my posting. Theatre Manager Jim Doty and Chief Projectionist Paul Hartman, made that theatre "The Place" to see the 70mm releases of the 70's and 80's in Rochester. It was a large stand-alone auditorium equipped with a Century Model JJ projector, and a Christie platter. Unfortunately, the theatre is now a furniture store, and the Loews Pittsford 1 and 2 (a sad story of a badly botched twinning [thumbsdown] ), that shared the parking lot, is now a women's health spa. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged
Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999

- posted 11-03-2003 05:27 PM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also saw ALIEN in its 70mm glory at the magnificent Dayton Mall I (I believe the operator there was John Harvey) and Cinema East in Columbus.

Scariest thing I've ever seen in a theater. What made it so scary in the beginning is that we had no idea of what the creature looked like or what powers it might have. Can it take other shapes? How does it kill? Why does it kill?

Mr. Coate and I disagree on this, but it is my opinion that it was ALIEN that truly started the golden age of 70mm, not STAR WARS. I base this on the fact that Alien had 70mm prints in smaller cities that were accessible by people who did not happen to live in the giant cities.

I've taken Mike's ALIEN list and tracked down the 70mm theatres, and, unfortunately, most are long gone.

 |  IP: Logged
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

- posted 11-03-2003 05:51 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You guys are nailing all the reasons why Alien in 70mm was a big deal. The film's subject matter was original, and told in such a creepily effective way. Seeing it in 70mm on an 80-foot screen with great mag sound, and with 1200 other first-time viewers, is just one of those film experiences not to be forgotten. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged
Edwin Graf Diemer
Film Handler

Posts: 47
From: Red Bank, NJ, USA
Registered: Jul 2000

- posted 11-03-2003 08:50 PM      Profile for Edwin Graf Diemer   Email Edwin Graf Diemer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You are so right-I saw "Alien" in 70mm at the Eric Tri-State Mall Theater in Claymont, Delaware. Amazing experience. It was a 920-seat house, and that was after twinning. It was originally at least 1,500 seats before being twinned in 1977, not long after "Star Wars" opened.
As for the re-issue, I caught it 11/1 at the UA King of Prussa IMAX theater, and the presentation was the real horror. Picture jumped all over the place, and gate pressure was set so high the whole picture popped out of focus every time there was a splice. Anamorphics were completely out of alignment as well. I told the manager, who agreed completely with me, and he said that they threw an ancient 35mm projector in the booth for standard presentations and that they have received many complaints about it. Real shame-they had several hundred people there for this 10:10 showing.

 |  IP: Logged
Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003

- posted 11-04-2003 02:18 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the director's cut on the IMAX screen at the Lincolnshire 20 in Lincolnshire, IL.

The print was in good shape, none of the lateral jittering that was experienced by others, but you could tell that this was a 35mm film being projected past its limits.

The picture was quite grainy, but that could have been just the age of the movie. Sound was good, especially for a 1979 movie. Projector noise was horrifically loud, however.

Overall, I think it was better to have seen it this way than to have seen it at one of the local multiplexes on a 26-ft screen.

 |  IP: Logged
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

- posted 11-04-2003 03:46 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Projector noise was horrifically loud, however.
IMAX theatres are usually pretty good about proper design to minimize sound transmission from the projection room into the auditorium. But the relatively large ports are an issue.

 |  IP: Logged


All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
- Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.