Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Clockwork Orange

   
Author Topic: Clockwork Orange
Dan Lyons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 698
From: Seal Beach, CA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 02-14-2003 01:15 AM      Profile for Dan Lyons   Email Dan Lyons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Clockwork Orange
2/13/03, 7pm , Chapman University , Orange Calif.

We all know the film, so this is purely a presentation review.

The venue: classroom/auditorium with stadium style seats, approx 80 seats. Screen is a perforated, motorized roll up. Screen has a “flat” ratio, no adjustable masking. Unfortunately, the walls are painted glossy off white, as well as the metal panels hanging from the ceiling.

The film : generally good condition I’d say. Reel 1 had very light emulsion scratches going in a diagnol manner, that would appear at regular intervals on the left hand side of the screen. At the reel changes, dialog was often cut off of the incoming reel due to people hacking off frames, and opaque splicing tape was used! YUCK!!!!!! Other than that, there were no mid-reel splices or emulsion lines.

BUT, there was one huge problem. The print was very dirty!!!! Any venue showing repertory prints needs to have and use a Kelmar cleaner, or something similar. [puke]

After the show, Malcolm McDowell appeared for Q&A. He asked the audience how the print was, the crowd groaned and told him it “sucked”. Very unfortunate,if only they booth had a way to clean it, I feel that that reaction would have not happened .

Danny

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-14-2003 01:30 AM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Post deleted

 |  IP: Logged

Dan Lyons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 698
From: Seal Beach, CA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 02-14-2003 01:47 AM      Profile for Dan Lyons   Email Dan Lyons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds good Paul, I'm editing my post!

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-14-2003 01:59 AM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is probably the print that played the Nuart in the fall of 1996.

Some history of the film. The original X-rated version played uncut in the United States upon its initial releases for more than a year (a fact that seems to be forgotten today). It then lost a few seconds to get an R rating to allow for more bookings through middle America. The cuts were restored for the home video version and laserdisc. Then the original x-rated version was re-released in 1996, although with an 'R' rating. An art house in Bakersfield got to show it at a midnight showing months before the Nuart's showing. Legend goes this film was banned in Britain, although some sources say it was Kubrick himself who had the film voluntarily removed from theatrical distribution following a copycat killing.

 |  IP: Logged

Christian Appelt
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 505
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 02-14-2003 02:56 PM      Profile for Christian Appelt   Email Christian Appelt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It`s not just a legend, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE was taken out of release and not shown in GB for almost 30 years.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-14-2003 03:41 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wasn't really questioning that is was out of distribution; rather the reason why (I've heard both stories, government ban, Kubrick requesting it) [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 02-14-2003 05:04 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The film received some very harsh reviews when it was first released in the uk, I believe that one of them was from a very well-known critic, who I think is still working, he certainly was quite recently, he is very conservative, with a small'c', (i.e. not meaning a member or supporter of the political party by that name), and does have a tendency to regard any film which he doesn't like as almost evil.

There were reports in certain newspapers which suggested links between the events portrayed in the film, and some real-life events, whether the film really did have this influence on anyone, I don't know; I've never seen any real evidence. It was said that Kubrick was disturbed by the claims which were made about his film, while others claimed that Kubrick received threats against himself, and possibly his family, if the film was not withdrawn. As far as I am aware, Kubrick never commented publically on these claims. We may never know the full truth.

The film was withdrawn from distribution in the uk by, or at the request of Kubrick, it was not banned by the BBFC, indeed, it was passed without cuts, and given an 'X' certificate, which I think at that time open to 16 year olds and over; the '18' certificate came later.

A few years ago a television company wanted to show some clips from the film as part of a programme. This ended in court, I think it was brought to court as a copyright issue. The television people argued that thay should be able to show extracts as part of a process of criticism or review of the work, the owners thought othewise, the television people won, and eventually the programme was transmitted. I don't know where they obtained the material which they screened. This was the first time that I had seen any of the film.

There were rumors that the film was to be re-released a few years ago, but this did not happen during Kubrik's lifeime. Shortly after his death the NFT ran a tribute season, and wanted to screen the film, I don't think they were able to, but I'm not certain about that. Shortly afterwards the film was re-released, both theatrically, and on video, and most beople, like myself, watching it for the first time, wondered what all the fuss had been about. I wouldn't say it was a great film, or his best work, but I can't see anything wrong with it, and it's certainly less violent than many of todays films. I have now seen the film three times, all on DVD, and it has seemed better with each viewing. Quite a good, but not great, film, I would say.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 02-15-2003 11:52 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Amazing story. The film played here often when I was a small kid, and became quite notorious but was never pulled from theaters. When I saw it for the first time, I also thought, why all the fuss. I think I will want to rewatch some time. You can see Darth Vader - David Prowse - without the mask in this movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-15-2003 06:01 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There were some beautiful new prints of this made for the WB 75th Anniversary fest in 1998. I ran print #110 at that time and it was in great shape (in sharp contrast to the beat-to-hell Kit Parker print that was in circulation before that time.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 02-16-2003 12:43 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul wrote:

quote:

It then lost a few seconds to get an R rating to allow for more bookings through middle America. The cuts were restored for the home video version and laserdisc.

Do you know exactly what material was cut?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-16-2003 01:01 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Do you know exactly what material was cut?
I honestly don't have a clue. I've seen what I thought were both versions (the R in 1975, the "new" R (ex-X version) in 1996, and can't tell the difference between the two. For all I know, the film may have just been re-rated without cuts back in the early 70's, but press info put out for the 90's version claimed otherwise.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.