Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Collateral Damage

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Community » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews » Collateral Damage

Author

Topic: Collateral Damage

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 02-08-2002 09:27 PM

2/8/02, Regal Cinema World 8, Eugene OR, Theater #4, 4:30PM. Digital sound, probably DTS. Overall excellent presentation. About 50 people there.

This is Arnold's best action picture in a long time, maybe up there with Predator and T2. I thoroughly liked it. Of course the subject matter of the story takes on a different meaning post-Sept. 11th. I'm wondering if they tinkered with it during the release delay, or went with the original film as it was pre-9/11. Anyway Ahnuld is in fine form, and he holds the movie together very well. He's an LA firefighter whose wife and child are killed in a terrorist attack. Ahnuld of course takes matters in his own hands and seeks to avenge their deaths. The trip is all-action and they keep it moving. As in most movies like this it's full of improbabilities, but I had no problem going with it. It's very well-done. [Or maybe after 9/11 I am just more receptive than usual to the concept of movie-Arnold kicking some terrorist butt.]

------------------
- dave
Avoid the meadow...

| IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 02-09-2002 07:52 PM

I watched an interview with the director last night, and he says that the movie wasn't changed at all. However they did decide to open the movie now because of how well "Behind Enemy Lines" and "Black Hawk Down" performed at the BoxOffice.

| IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99

posted 02-10-2002 09:01 PM

Why oh Why didn't they film this in scope?
This is a sort of different direction for Arnie. He was not his wise cracking self in this one and no memorable tag lines. This was a pretty serious film. Is Arnie trying to become a serious actor?
I liked it. The presentation was Ok, I saw it in the same theater that I saw "Beautiful Mind" in a week or so ago. Theater #8 at the Regal Poulsbo 10. They still haven't fixed the flickering bulb, even though I made a trip to the "managers" office after I saw BM and told them of the problem. This screen was way underlit. It was presented in DTS, which was very nice except during one part when I heard some repetitive clicking in the right surrounds. It didn't last long and wasn't enough to spoil the film.
The bad guy shouldn't have axed him that last question....

------------------
Greg Mueller
Amateur Astronomer, Machinist, Filmnut http://www.muellersatomics.com/

| IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 02-10-2002 09:19 PM

Greg, I sat in the 6th row, which helped make it look a little scopey.

This movie really looked good on a brightly-lighted screen, scope or not...

| IP: Logged

Brad Haven
Master Film Handler

Posts: 300
From: fremantle, West Australia
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 09-30-2002 12:17 PM

I watched this on DVD out of boredom.
I could only manage 12 minutes of it, i found it very sad to see arnie looking like he was going to drop dead of OLD AGE! his plastic surgery suddenly became very obvious.
Every frame that i saw of this film said D grade film making, arnie sure has gone down hill! now i know why he's done terminator 3, he needs the cash/publicity!

I WAS APPALLED BY THIS FILM!

| IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 12-31-2002 02:40 AM

I was sure to be unliking of this picture... HOWEVER..

very much surprised to really like this movie. Arnie gets his chance to play a very HUMAN character, which is odd for him. he gets to play the struggling husband and father who is left alone and left to live with his own internal guilt and desire to exact revenge.

This is a great film, and too bad I agree, it should have been scope.

Dave

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.