Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Requiem Foe A Dream

   
Author Topic: Requiem Foe A Dream
timothy johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: minneapolis, mN 55419
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 11-24-2000 05:21 PM      Profile for timothy johnson   Email timothy johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Requiem Foe A Dream is the best film of the year so far, this is a deep and disturbing film about addiction and lonliness, Ellen Burstyn's performance is OSCAR calliber. If you like serious cutting edge filmmaking in the style of A Clock Work Orange and Trainspotting, then this film is for you. I saw it twice in West Hollywood and came back home and saw it again, and could still see it once more in the theater. Darren Aronofsky (director of Pie)is a filmmaker to be watched...

 |  IP: Logged

Sean M. Grimes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 247
From: Lunenburg, MA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-29-2000 03:03 AM      Profile for Sean M. Grimes   Author's Homepage   Email Sean M. Grimes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tonight I watched it. There were about thirty people in the audience. I would bet that right now at five in the am I am the first person who actually can complete one sentence of thought. I would recommend every one to see it and yet at the same time no one to see it. It is the most vile and upseting movie I have ever seen- yet I feel lucky to actually have a theater around town that has the gaull to actually show an nc-17 movie. Especially for the simple fact that it's rating has nothing to do with overly graphic (to a point) scenes. Every one should see this movie. yet at the same time I hope to god no one else does. And that is all I have to say.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Connolly
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Derby, England
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 04:54 AM      Profile for Phil Connolly   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Connolly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A Movie which defies comment, nothing I can say about it matters. Go and see it!! It's disturbing, but I'm happy that filmakers sometimes produce work of this callibe.

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 07:57 AM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't agree more with you Sean. I really liked the film, even more as time passes, but it is very hard to watch. It is quite disturbing and upsetting, but quite fantastic. I've seen few films that have produced such polarixed reactions. People either seem to hate it ir really like it. Perhaps those of us that really like it are just a bit disturbed.

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-25-2001 12:12 AM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
dont mean to picky, tim, but its called requiem FOR a dream, and "pie" is actually spelled pi since there is no key for the symbol.

im sure those were just typos, but i just wanted to clear that up.

also, sean, where did you see the film where they labeled it nc-17?
it was actually released unrated to avoid that.

was it a major chain?

i know that kids (another disturbing film that should be seen) was unrated, but when one of our amc theatres in houston played it, they labeled it nc-17 also.

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-27-2001 06:37 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I finally saw this last night. Wow. Definitely the best film that I've seen that was released last year. I liked Pi, but this just blows it away. I'm not sure what else to say here, other than "go see this!" I can't say that it's an "enjoyable" film to watch (it isn't), but, like "The War Zone," it is exceptionally powerful and a must-see.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-10-2001 12:11 AM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OMG! What a film! I saw this on DVD the other night and I'm simply blown away by the overall cinematography and story line.

Such things that are happening around us ALL right now, that are overlooked, like the fact that the doctor never even bothered to examine Burstyn. He simply gave her an Rx and that was that. How many times does this happen in reality? I've had it happend to me even!

The film shows, in a very different way, the effects of addiction(s) on individuals. Very powerful stuff in this film. I'd consider this a must see in my book! I'm glad I have a real film buff working for me now, otherwise I probably would have never seen this film!

This film, and others with the same calibre of acting/directing are what *I* consider OSCAR worthy, not the run of the mill films churned out by Hollywood these days!

Your milage may vary,

------------------
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Duvall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 500
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-10-2001 05:38 AM      Profile for Christopher Duvall   Email Christopher Duvall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For those that are interested,Darren Aronofsky has been named the director to tackle the next Batman film by Warner Brothers. Should be interesting...

------------------
Chris Duvall
General Manager
Regal Cinemas Colonnade14
Las Vegas, NV

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Elzie
Film Handler

Posts: 17
From: Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-10-2001 05:47 AM      Profile for Matt Elzie   Email Matt Elzie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Darren Aronofsky is a truly talented director, which is somewhat of a rarity in Hollywood. Watching Requiem For a Dream is like getting kicked in the teeth, but somehow Aronofsky manages to make that a good thing. This takes true skill. He also gets a great performance out of Marlon Wayans, which is a miracle as well. Requiem For a Dream defies the "drug movie" genre, and creates an entirely different animal. Watch for many newcomers to begin ripping off his style. The fact that Aronofsky rejected the MPAA shows true intelligence and artistic integrity. In my opinion the MPAA is an outdated and (in it's current state) useless system for rating films.
I've heard that Aronofsky has been tapped to direct (and possibly write) the upcoming Batman: Year One. Some people are already calling him a sellout, but I disagree. I think that he could breathe new life and energy into the bloated and pathetic studio franchise that the Batman movies have come to represent. I'm looking forward to it.


 |  IP: Logged

JC Cowles
Film Handler

Posts: 77
From: St. Paul, MN
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 07-01-2001 03:51 AM      Profile for JC Cowles   Email JC Cowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I love this movie. I wish I had run down to the local arthouse when it was playing there and seen it, but I saw it for the first time on DVD. Typically with limited release films such as this I expect a compelling storyline with little visual and acoustic flare. RFOD had it all.

I first started taking note of Ellen Burstyn's career when I saw her in Spitfire Grill. You can't take your eyes off her, even in her worst moments.

The cinematography and editing in this movie were excellent. Visually stunning. It reminded me a bit of Doug Liman's "Go". The editing gave the movie good pace in a story that could otherwise be long drawn-out and campy.

Aurally, I found it to be very engrossing. Of course, a lot of movies that end up in arthouses don't get to mix at Skywalker Ranch. Dolby Digital 5.1 indeed! The surround channels really play an active role in this movie.

The story was depressing. But it didn't make me sad...it simply intrigued me into finding out how the characters would deal with their situations. I applaud Aronofsky and the crew for making a spectacular movie and finding the perfect balance of things like storyline, actors, special effects, sound and cinematography. Most of Hollywood's dribble seems to be weighted far too much to the special effects and actors. And once in a while I just wish they'd spend half the special effects budget on a decent script.


 |  IP: Logged

Tod J. Weitzel
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 07-07-2001 04:20 PM      Profile for Tod J. Weitzel   Author's Homepage   Email Tod J. Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What I don't think anyone has mentioned so far is how fantastic Clint Mansell's score is. I went out and bought the CD last night, but thus far can't bear to watch the film again; the first time I saw it it made me ill, but in a good way...

-Lx?

 |  IP: Logged

JC Cowles
Film Handler

Posts: 77
From: St. Paul, MN
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 07-08-2001 12:42 AM      Profile for JC Cowles   Email JC Cowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Part of being Aurally Engrossing, as I mentioned, is the score. I love the Kronos Quartet. The few places I've looked for the RFAD soundtrack I haven't found it. But it is on my list of ones to purchase.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Voorhies
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Overland Park, KS
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-22-2001 04:42 AM      Profile for Joshua Voorhies   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Voorhies   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I found the soundtrack at Best Buy (of all places). It's identical to the the music in the movie, which is a good thing in my opinion.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.