Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets   » Ghostbusters (1984) (35mm Prints request) (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Ghostbusters (1984) (35mm Prints request)
Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 02-21-2003 12:37 PM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
[beer]

As far as I know it's scope and I would guess Dolby A?

[ 03-28-2003, 08:25 AM: Message edited by: Michael Brown ]

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-21-2003 12:45 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Columbia Pictures
Scope
Dolby A and Mono prints
6 Reels

[beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 02-23-2003 07:31 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MGM Culver City Lab (which AFAIK never struck dual inventory prints so all should be stereo)

-Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-24-2003 12:58 AM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ran this movie in 1984 and we most certainly had a MONO print. We were expecting to show Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom in our only stereo-equipped auditorium all summer long so we got a mono print of Ghostbusters. When Ghostbusters became more popular, it moved to our "Number One" screen where we were forced to show it in mono because we didn't get a new print. Trust me, the heads and tails clearly said "mono" and I tried all the different stereo settings on the Dolby processor just for fun... but the print was very certainly mono. (Can you tell that it's still frustrating to think about it?) Not sure how many of those mono prints have been preserved over the years.

If memory serves, it's 1 hour and 50 minutes.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-24-2003 11:13 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aaron wrote:
quote:
MGM Culver City Lab (which AFAIK never struck dual inventory prints so all should be stereo.
I have a print and it still says mono on the leaders. And the
track looks like mono on the bench.

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Lawrence
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 192
From: Middleburg, PA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 02-24-2003 06:07 PM      Profile for Pete Lawrence   Email Pete Lawrence   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just looked at a print I have access to at the moment. It's on 1984 film stock. "Stereo" is printed in the leader and the optical track is indeed in stereo. No mention of Dolby on it anywhere.

 |  IP: Logged

Ben Wales
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Southampton. England
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 02-24-2003 06:27 PM      Profile for Ben Wales   Email Ben Wales   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep the last UK cinema print of "Ghostbusters" is scope and Dolby A, reason I know, is we have the print screened at the Odeon Cinema in Bournemouth for a student screening, almost sold out and a second is planned for this wednesday night.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Brown
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1522
From: Bradford, England
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 03-20-2003 02:38 AM      Profile for Michael Brown   Email Michael Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yup.

I have a scope and Dolby A.
6 Reels
Scope

Also:

Polyester
Fugicolor
Etched cue-marks (white circles)

[ 07-29-2003, 12:06 PM: Message edited by: Michael Brown ]

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 03-20-2003 09:53 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
polyester based? That print must have been a re-printed issue since they did not use polyester at that time.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 10-09-2004 02:00 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 569 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

John Carpenter
Film Handler

Posts: 96
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 10-09-2004 02:00 PM      Profile for John Carpenter   Email John Carpenter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ghostbusters – 35mm (1984):
*6 reels
*Sony
*ETS (print from Landover, MD Depot)
*Dolby A
*Scope
*107 mins
*Delivery company used – Danzas

Print # 4001: No missing footage, some light scratching.

edited - typo on # of reels (should be 6)

[ 10-10-2004, 10:08 AM: Message edited by: John Carpenter ]

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-10-2004 12:38 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did you verify that all the reels were there since it is a six reel picture not five.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 08-28-2006 06:00 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 687 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-28-2006 06:00 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ETS print #4004 is a mono print struck on 2003-datecoded Kodak 2383 stock. [Mad] Why would anyone strike a mono print in 2003?

Soundtrack is labeled "ESTAR MONO #2," and the leaders also claim in the picture area to be "Anamorphic original neg. 4-27-84 recut 5-18-84 recut 5-21-84." I have my doubts as to whether it's really an oneg print, but it's conceivable--it has Phare cues.

Print had light-to-moderate scratching. Decent for a 1984 title, not-so-hot for a 2003 reprinting.

I'm told that it gets a lot of bookings, though. ETS says they have 14 prints, out of which 5 are marked damaged and 9 of which are available.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 07-31-2010 01:21 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 1432 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.