Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » ProRes 422

   
Author Topic: ProRes 422
Bradley J Sime
Film Handler

Posts: 68
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Apr 2016


 - posted 02-22-2017 10:37 PM      Profile for Bradley J Sime   Author's Homepage   Email Bradley J Sime       Edit/Delete Post 
What are everyone's thoughts on ProRess 422 as a presentation format? I find it brutally unstable for anything feature length, yet I receive it constantly, despite specifically requesting that we don't receive material in this format. Everything I've read about it seems to say that's primarily used for post, and not intended for presentation.

Thoughts? Anyone know of any good players for it?

 |  IP: Logged

Patrick Nuse
Film Handler

Posts: 1
From: Apple Valley, CA
Registered: Apr 2016


 - posted 02-23-2017 12:28 AM      Profile for Patrick Nuse   Email Patrick Nuse   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, It is a post production format intended to be a format for interchanging footage between editors. I have tried to run them for a film festival that I volunteer for. even at moderate bit rates, it is very unpredictable. I imagine people try to submit the format, because that is what their editor gave them. Maybe they meant well handing over a high quality copy, but not necessarily knowing that it does not playback well. I usually just trans-code them to a high bit-rate H.264 for use in our festival. Getting a good quality file from submitters is a black art.
File submission guidelines This link is what I send to submitters to try to get a decent file. I tried to keep it as simple as possible.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 02-23-2017 07:34 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What are the actual problems you encounter when playing back full length ProRes, and which player applications/appliances do you use?

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 02-23-2017 10:14 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At most of the more professional festivals or corporate events I've worked at
(such as the big APPLE & ORACLE conventions and trade shows) I use either DT
Labs "Playback Pro" or "Playback Pro +" from DT Labs. ($400 & $600 respectively,
but worth every penny) OR a dedicated hardware player, the "PIX270i" from Video
Devices (appx $6,000 - Great unit but overkill for some shows.)

Both of these systems will pretty much play back "anything", but PlaybackPro
users guide recommends sticking with ProRes 422, and whenever I've worked
with the Pix270i, it's always been loaded with ProRes 422 files too.

I like Playback Pro a lot. In fact, this weekend I've got an all day event that
I'll be running off of two PBP equipped MAC Pro's, and I've already converted
the pile of Blu-Rays & assorted other format files to PR-422, which will make
running the show a lot easier, and "smoother" then trying to cue & switch
between various clips on assorted disks and computer files.

More Info:
PlaybackPro
PIX270i

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Metcalfe
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 134
From: Austin, TX, U.S.
Registered: May 2010


 - posted 02-23-2017 11:09 AM      Profile for Jason Metcalfe   Email Jason Metcalfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
VLC also handles ProRes pretty well

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-23-2017 11:17 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agreed with Jim that if you absolutely have to play these files straight to the screen, Playback Pro is an excellent solution. We have one programming partner who insists on bringing his shows on a Mac laptop, and I have to admit that, despite my instinctive loathing for doing movie presentations this way, Playback Pro works well, in particular that it's almost bombproof as far as OSD and getting other unwanted crap on the screen is concerned.

However, whenever I receive these files for any other show, I will always DCP-ize them first unless there simply isn't time.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-23-2017 11:21 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, how does everyone determine if the files use the broadcast-legal (16-235) or full-range (0-255) luminance scale? How does one even ask a question like this of the person supplying the file? Many so-called "film"-makers don't even know their own movie's aspect ratio, much less answers to questions like this.

The other issue with the file formats is sound formats. Most of these are Lt/Rt mixes, but has anyone had a Pro Res file with a discrete 5.1 or 7.1 mix? Is there any way to play that properly, other than using something with an SDI output and then disembedding the sound from the SDI feed?

My preferred hardware player for Pro Res is the AJA Ki-Pro, but converting them to DCP also works well.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 02-23-2017 01:55 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott-
My experience is that most of the Pro-Res audio files have been LT-RT,
as you point out in your post.

But I know I've worked on one or two shows that had 5.1 discrete tracks.
I wasn't using my computer for that show, but if I recall, we had a MacPro
desktop machine with a multi-channel analog audio output card, and there
was some sort of QuickTime plug-in involved in the process.

I think somewhere on that Playback Pro website, it gives exact requirements.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-23-2017 01:59 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
The other issue with the file formats is sound formats. Most of these are Lt/Rt mixes, but has anyone had a Pro Res file with a discrete 5.1 or 7.1 mix? Is there any way to play that properly, other than using something with an SDI output and then disembedding the sound from the SDI feed?
I don't know if Playback Pro will let you send 5.1 and 7.1 from a ProRes file out through the Mac's HDMI embedded audio - all the stuff I've played this way has been mono or L/R.

I've always handled 5.1 and 7.1 ProRes files by making DCPs of them. You need to be careful, though - sometimes the channel assignments are weird. For example, there is one French distributor that sends us ProRes trailers that have a stereo French mix on channels 1 and 2, French 5.1 on 3 through 8 (but not per the ISDCF channel assignments - it goes L, C, R, LS, RS, LFE), and the English dub 5.1 on 9 through 14. So to make the DCP, I need to remap the appropriate channels to 1 through 6 on the DCP, and add the .srt file they supply to put the subtitles on.

 |  IP: Logged

Bradley J Sime
Film Handler

Posts: 68
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Apr 2016


 - posted 02-23-2017 05:18 PM      Profile for Bradley J Sime   Author's Homepage   Email Bradley J Sime       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, we have Playback Pro, and it IS most definitely awesome. I just find that with large, feature length ProRes files, frames are dropped, or I'm able to spot digital artifacts in one test, and then they are gone when I go back to double check. It just seems entirely unreliable as a presentation format.

I have a film submissions guideline, but filmmakers are filmmakers, and those guidelines are followed only about 75% of the time.

Anyway, thanks for all the responses and everything.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 02-23-2017 06:01 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why do you question the format, instead of your playback setup or specific files?

-Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-25-2017 02:36 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All of you having problems playing back ProRes 422 must have super-shitty hardware. ProRes 422 is the gimpy version of ProRes. ProRes 422HQ is much better and ProRess 4444 (full color space) is even better than that. All ProRes flavors playback perfectly steady from an attached USB hard drive on my computer. Never heard about Playback Pro. I just use Quicktime 7 (not Quicktime X). Are you using a Windows machine? Windows sucks for video so that may be the problem you are having with ProRes.

If you want a hardware player just get an Atomos Ninja 2 and an SSD. It outputs HDMI and will play your ProRes files back. It can also record ProRes. I'll have to test mine to make sure it doesn't do any unwanted OSD stuff.

As far as broadcast legal goes, all ProRes flavors have more dynamic range than broadcast legal. It's up to the editor to confine levels within that space or not. Just assume it's not broadcast legal. Why is broadcast legal even a thing in this age of digital television anyway?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.