Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Future of Sony D-Cinema (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Future of Sony D-Cinema
Jason Metcalfe
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 134
From: Austin, TX, U.S.
Registered: May 2010


 - posted 03-29-2015 04:51 PM      Profile for Jason Metcalfe   Email Jason Metcalfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've heard different things for a while now but with Sony apparently halting development on their laser D-Cinema projector
I wonder if anyone has some insight into what the future will hold for Sony's Digital Cinema department, do we know if they have any plans for a "5th generation" projector?

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-29-2015 05:41 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the future of the entire Sony corporation is a rather interesting one. The whole conglomerate of businesses hasn't seen a profit in many years so all their departments and subsidiaries are probably under evaluation.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-29-2015 07:46 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If history is any teacher...their long-term prospects for projection in cinemas doesn't look good. As the DCinema conversion is winding down their perspective sales are pretty bleak (true for DLP too but at least they have three major manufacturers competing for that piece of the pie)

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 03-29-2015 08:12 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why would 'three competing' companies make their situation any better?

The situation after the final stage of the digital rollout is complicated for all companies in that area. They needed to establish high-output manufacturing processes for a couple of years, and knew that they would face a fast decline at some point.

However, I think all four companies can deal with that, because the cinema business was only one of their product segments. Also, the same factory that builds Sonys digital cinema projectors builds other professional production gear. It's a modular part-time fab.

What makes things even more complicated to judge for Sony is their cross-market 4k/UHD marketing. They want to sell 4k to consumers, gamers, cinemas, production companies, etc. That's why they want to produce 4k movies as well to sustain that approach.

We should also not forget that all companies went into 10year warranty commitments, so they are obliged to support their product at least as long as that.

Frankly I couldn't care less about laser projection. It is either too expensive or nothing more than a buzz-word-item (in the form of phosphor-conversion devices).

When you scroll back in this forum, you will find similar discussions about the future of NEC, BARCO, or TI's DLP division as a whole.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-30-2015 04:30 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Unless a cheaper and/or far better technology comes around that can replace it, there's no reason to expect TI's DLP to go away anytime soon.

Sony's tech is built around their proprietary LCoS implementation called SXRD. There's currently no other major player licensing this technology from them, so all investments into this technology have to be recouped with their own product portfolio. If they decide to stop investing money in this technology, it's essentially over for their digital cinema products too. It also makes it harder for them to spin it off or sell it to one of their competitors or any other player wanting to get into the niche market of Ditigal Cinema.

Christie and Barco both specialize in professional visualization products for niche markets and the cinema products of NEC, Barco and Christie are all built around a very common TI reference platform. Both Barco and Christie offer models in which the only notable difference between the DCI model and the "professional" model is the interface card configuration. So, for them, the costs of being and staying in this niche are rather minimal, it's part of their natural evolution of many of their core products.

But even if any one of those big players decides to discontinue their digital cinema projector products, they could easily sell or transfer it to any other big player in the DLP market space, like e.g. Panasonic.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-30-2015 06:06 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The three DLP companies have effectively created the lion's share of the market for DLP...Sony only has Sony to keep its hand in the market and they took a winner-take-all approach to their sales/installation. What is Sony's percentage of the installed base? That is what they have to work with.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 03-30-2015 07:40 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sonys numbers are around 18.000 4k screens. That is a lot less than TI-DLP. But it's more than NEC. Plus - Sony get's ALL the revenue from every installed system - display-technology, Projector, server, and service/parts. They do not have to pay TI their OEM share or split the revenue with a server manufacturer. Market share is not the major point here. Margin is. And Sony has a lot of hard to calculate intra-company processes going, e.g. as I wrote previously, their company-wide 4k strategy.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-30-2015 08:23 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, that's all true. But do we know if this subdivision of the "pro" division is actually making any money for them? That's usually where the decision making process starts. [Wink]

Also, it will be interesting to see what kind of company they want to be in the future. Do they still want to do a little bit of everything (which seemingly isn't turning out great for them) or do they want to focus on some key products in some key markets? And if so, what markets will those be?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-30-2015 08:59 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Carsten, are you saying Sony's 18,000 is greater than all NEC (DCI) or just greater than their 4K's?

Could the industry changing over to 4K altogether be a major revenue driver?

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-30-2015 10:12 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A continued migration to 4K will be a driver for the industry, no doubt, but obviously slower rate as with the looming extinction of 35mm film.

As for Sony, they're already at 4K for each and every deployment, so for them it's either lasers, 8K or nothing as an incentive to upgrade.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Metcalfe
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 134
From: Austin, TX, U.S.
Registered: May 2010


 - posted 03-30-2015 04:10 PM      Profile for Jason Metcalfe   Email Jason Metcalfe   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know there are some other intermediate upgrades that I've heard about over the years, new HDSDI technology that will enable I think 4K HFR (maybe it was 4K 3D HFR), though the RealD system would also need to be upgraded

Obviously they're not going to shutter their operations overnight but even if Laser is just a buzz word it still seems like ceasing development can't be a good thing. But who knows maybe that was just a rumor and we'll see a new system from them at the end of next month at Cinemacon

Are there still developments to be made with the quality of the DLP/LCoS chips or are higher resolutions going to be achieved through different means?

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 03-30-2015 05:08 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There's a major european Sony representative giving a speech about Sonys laser projector development mid-may on a cinema trade-fair here. I don't think they are announcing this in order for him to say 'We're not doing it'. What this guy told me last year was that they are looking for the right business model for them and the exhibitors. LIPs now come into the market after literally all screens have been converted to Xenon or UHP DCI. Of course there will always be a need for new gear replacing old gear, and there is a need for brighter and better 3D on the largest screens for sure. But these are very small numbers compared to what drove the digital rollout during the last 5-8 years.

Sure, Sonys SXRD is limited in screen size as long as they run xenon, and laser would allow them to go for the largest screens. They could have done it easily, they had laser projector prototypes running in public back in 2005,

http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news_archives/img/pdf/vol_40/sideview40.pdf

and public DCI LIP prototype back in 2012 (just as the DLP companies).

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/laser-light-engines-sony-present-first-public-demonstrati on-high-brightness-laser-3d-nyse-sne-1642593.htm

They sell phosphor conversion laser projectors in the business projector market for two years now, as well as consumer 4k laser projectors:

http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/show-projectors/resource.solutions.bbsccms-assets-show-projectors-laserprojectorslanding page.shtml

http://www.sony.net/Products/4k-ultra-short-throw/

Sony even makes their own high power laser engines. To me this looks as if they sure can do it, but don't see a valuable business model around it currently in the DCI market. LIPs do make sense in the presentation projector market, hence Sony makes and sells them there.

What could actually drive considerable numbers of new DCI LIPs to be sold within the next couple of years? Maybe Sony acts quite sensible here.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 03-31-2015 12:47 AM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Sony's tech is built around their proprietary LCoS implementation called SXRD. There's currently no other major player licensing this technology from them, so all investments into this technology have to be recouped with their own product portfolio. If they decide to stop investing money in this technology, it's essentially over for their digital cinema products too. It also makes it harder for them to spin it off or sell it to one of their competitors or any other player wanting to get into the niche market of Ditigal Cinema.
Two things come to mind re: Sony and their future in D-Cinema:

Betamax

and

SDDS

[Roll Eyes]

Their history of not licensing their technologies to other manufacturers (which is why VHS, a technically inferior format, won out over Beta with it's higher resolution (and stereo sound from day one IIRC)) is why they will not survive in the D-Cinema world. The higher operational costs with Sony gear, and their refusal (if it is still going on) to allow anyone other than their limited number of Sony techs to repair the equipment is why so few players bought into Sony gear.

And let's not forget SDDS.... and how rapidly they just dumped all support like a rock. Too bad, because SDDS did (to my ears anyway) sound better than Dolby or DTS/DataSat.

I just don't get why a company with such a readily recognizable brand name (and in most cases, very good to excellent equipment) cannot learn from history and quit making the same stupid mistakes...is it corporate decision making at the worst, or cultural arrogance?

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 03-31-2015 05:04 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sony stopped selling SDDS equipment when it was evident that Dolby and DTS won that format war. But they supported the system until last year. They had a full position dedicated to only SDDS support until 2013, they supplied parts and maintained the SDDS website until then. And they supplied SDDS prints.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-02-2015 05:46 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think Sony will stop honoring their commitments to their install base, even if they were to discontinue their D-Cinema lineup. Like Carsten already put it, they also honored their SDDS commitments years after the product was essentially dead in the water.

I guess Sony will have a harder time to get their LCoS based technology to reliably work in combination with high-power laser light sources. LCD based technology is quite sensitive to heat.

Where they might have an advantage though is in achieving higher resolutions. I guess it will be simpler to increase the resolution of a device based solely on a traditional silicon substrate production process, compared to a device with millions of microscopic mechanical parts, like DLP.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.