Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Screen Gains and contrast (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Screen Gains and contrast
Doug Woods
Film Handler

Posts: 2
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Registered: Nov 2013


 - posted 01-30-2014 05:17 AM      Profile for Doug Woods   Author's Homepage   Email Doug Woods   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey there, not sure if this is the place to ask this question, however...

I'm setting up a DI (digital intermediate) colour correction studio with a Christie Solaria One and I would like to get opinions on the best screen gain to achieve the best contrast.

The throw is 25 ft to a 105 inch wide screen. I will be replacing the screen with a little larger one when I determine the most suitable materials.

I currently have a 1.1 gain screen and the blacks feel a little washed out especially compared to the LED LCD monitors.

I can achieve total darkness, except for my computer interface monitor.

If anyone has experience with this I'd love to hear it.

Thanks
Doug

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-30-2014 06:05 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Solaria one is brightness, not contrast optimized. Black levels on all current cinema DLPs are not optimal, with the 1.2" models being the best in that respect and the S2k models being the worst.
A gain screen will make it even worse. If you have enough brightness for your screen size, you may go with a matt grey screen surface (negative gain), and if possible you should use the lens in it's tele position, that is, place the projector the farthest away from the screen.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-30-2014 11:23 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Christie offers high contrast lenses as well as a high contrast kit. I'm know Barco does not and I don't think NEC does either, but I'm not 100% sure on NEC. Go with the CP2215, get the kit and the high contrast lens. You will find the image is vastly superior to the typical result.

I try and use high contrast lenses whenever I can, but on occasion where I've got light to spare I'll put the high contrast kit in as well. I've never done it in a CP2210/2215, but I believe that is an option.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-30-2014 11:44 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well it seems that even the 'tuned' postproduction versions of the Christies and Barcos only achieve something like a 10-15% improvement in contrast/black level (at something like 50% less light efficiency).

http://www.barco.com/en/Specsheets/32b82c40-301e-4c30-a650-fa1db2244d0c/DP2K-P.pdf

That is near to nothing. And I wouldn't even start to think about a 4k:

http://www.barco.com/en/Specsheets/9c7e0fc6-b4f3-4efc-bd34-4de6d1a38287/DP4K-P.pdf

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-30-2014 12:16 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad what is the Christie "contrast kit" comprised of. Nice to see them offer this.

I took a Barco 4kP HC lens and replaced the factory iris with a more aggressive cats eye iris along with an aggressive iris in the light pipe just after the lamp house. I achieved 4000:1 maintaining uniformity. Most of the increase comes from the iris in the lens. The trade off is light loss, 40 to 50% but the increase in PQ is visually noticeable.
If a laser retro ever becomes available those numbers may increase due to the nature of laser and its tight beam.

I measured a Sony SRX515 over 8500:1 out of box, Minolta meter, impressive. PQ is vastly improved over the SRX320.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-30-2014 02:34 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So you measured, with a 14fL center, on a checkerboard pattern, .001647fL or thereabouts?

Forget the checkerboard pattern...you measure that with full on and then full off? What is the accuracy of your meter?

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-30-2014 04:20 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Im using both a Photo Research "Cinebrate" for readings off the screen and Minolta T-10 for readings back at the projector.Yes full on/off is used.
My clients have private screening rooms with complete light control to take advantage of any extra contrast.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-30-2014 06:26 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you want higher contrast, you should get a Sony 515. Contrast ratio is waay higher than DLP.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-30-2014 06:42 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And the new SRX-R510 is no more expensive even at 4k than the Solaria One.

However, it lacks the necessary interfaces for a grading suite (2k/4k xyz only through DCP, only HDMI 1080p for external sources).

The SRX-T615 would be better suited, but is waay more expensive (for no apparent reason ;-)

- Carsten

BTW - Marco, did you read my private message?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-30-2014 06:51 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm confused...you are using an incident meter to measure contrast ratio off of a screen? I guess you are holding the meter up to the screen, measuring full on and then measuring full black.

The Cinebrate tops out at 1000:1 contrast ratio...and that is if you hit the center at 50fL.

And it is all BS anyway...put up an alternating checkerboard pattern and see what you have.

 |  IP: Logged

Doug Woods
Film Handler

Posts: 2
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Registered: Nov 2013


 - posted 01-30-2014 08:25 PM      Profile for Doug Woods   Author's Homepage   Email Doug Woods   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
WOW, what an active forum. I love it.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

So I'm looking into the contrast kit for my projector as I have plenty of light to spare with the .3 ND filter and bulb at 59% to achieve a 14 fl reading.

2 important questions.

1 Do you know if screen manufacturers supply sample pieces, swatches, to test the various screen gains before you commit to a screen?

2 How do I embellish my "film handler" handle in my profile.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-30-2014 08:46 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You should be able to get sample pieces from the screen people, I have definitely seen them. Ask!

The member rating/description is based on post count, I don't know how many posts are required for each level. Probably Brad can override that and even put oddball ones in if he wants, not sure about that though.

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-30-2014 08:58 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The meter is place facing the lens close enough to get a solid reading between full on and off. Checker board is used to measure ANSI contras not on/off.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-30-2014 09:01 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Alan Gouger
Im using both a Photo Research "Cinebrate" for readings off the screen and Minolta T-10 for readings back at the projector.
I guess Alans 'off the screen' means 'pointing the Cinebrate to the screen', reading screen luminance, while 'back at the projector' means he is holding the T-10 at the screen level pointing 'back towards the projector' reading incident light level on the screen surface. I first got it exactly the other way round...

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 01-30-2014 09:09 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes the PR takes its reading off the screen. The T-10 faces the projector usually a foot from the lens. You need enough light at 0ire to excite the meter. For best accuracy using an illuminance meter measurements between full on/off should be taken from the same distance to the lens.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.