Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » QSC DCP/DCM crossovers

   
Author Topic: QSC DCP/DCM crossovers
Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 03-01-2013 11:32 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings gentlemen,

I have recently set up some sound systems equipped with QSC DCP or DCM10/20/30. Before that I had proficiently used DCM1-2-3.
While time-aligning bi-amped systems, I've always been able to perfectly adjust the crossover point with almost all brands of speakers.

Since my first DCM 10 I noted that I wasn't able to properly align LF and HF. No matter what delay I used, polarity or crossover frequency, there was always a deep dip at the crossover point. I could't even hear the difference in sound when changing polarity and delay. This has been happening with several installations, so I am now wondering what I am doing wrong.
The only compromise I found is to change the crossover types from L-R 4th order to 2nd order. 2nd order crossovers give a less deep dip and I can see/hear a difference when I tweak the delay.

DCM1/2/3 specification table say that the crossovers used are Linkwitz-Riley 24dB/octave. Which should be 4th order if I'm not mistaken. The default crossover used by a DCP are 4th orders as well. Am I missing something here or maybe when QSC say 4th order on the DCM1/2/3 they mean two x two 2nd orders?

I appreciate any help on the matter.

Regards,
Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-01-2013 02:04 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
QSC DCMs are always 4th orders L-R. Note, this should normally have a dip at crossover that the time alignment should be able to get maximized. Some will overlap the crossover region to get rid of the dip.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 03-01-2013 02:47 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Steve,

Then the default DCP setting (L-R 4th order) is the same filter found in the DCM1-2-3?
No, the dip I've been seeing with DCP and DCM10-20-30 cannot be improved by time alignment. It's a massive dip. Different brands of speakers (JBL, Martin) have given the same result. I set the crossover frequency according to the manufacturer PDF. And I try to reverse the polarity as well of course.
I've never such an issue before: as I said with DCM 1-2-3 it's always been easy to get rid of the time error.

As you suggested, I have also tried overlapping the two ways a bit to improve the response. But I must admit that I'm puzzled here. In the past I've often ended up with perfectly-ish flat response when time aligning speakers with the earlier generation of DCM, with no EQ required.

Have you seen any of that or is it just a coincidence?

Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-01-2013 08:44 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is a mathematical fact that if you have 4th order L-R crossover where both are set to the same frequency, you will have a 3dB dip at crossover...I've seen it on all systems. If one wants a maximally flat response through crossover, a 3rd order Butterworth will do it.

The L-R crossover has other advantages though...including very step skirts and does not introduce the phase anomalies like the other variants.

I'm not a proponent of the DCM series of monitor/crossovers (don't particularly like the gain-structure) so I don't have tons of experience with all of their permutations but I have used them.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 03-02-2013 03:55 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If it was a 3dB dip I wouldn't complain.
What is your choice of filters when using other crossovers?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-02-2013 06:16 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It depends on the speaker system, honestly. I've used both L-R 4th order and Butterworth 3rd order. Sometimes even a mix an match...but again, it depends on the speaker system. If the manufacturer has a specification, I always start with that. I don't try to reinvent what has already been done.

One thing you might try is to connect your analyzer right to the DCM output (or on the amplifier input, if that is easier and look at the actual output without the room/speaker getting involved. If you have a system that will allow you to combine A and B inputs to an analyzer (like the D2 analyzer)...you can really see what the speaker is being presented.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 03-02-2013 08:10 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Steve,

I was indeed thinking of checking the outputs to better understand what the speaker receives. My analyser allow to sum two inputs, so it's definitely doable. I'd like to compare a DCM1 with a DMC10 to see if I'm dreaming here or I'm facing something new.

I do love DCMs and DCPs, lots of options available. I just need to sort out this main issue.

When checking the raw response of a driver - paying attention not to break it if it's an HF one - what do you look to identify the crossover point? the -10dB point?

Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 07-18-2013 01:08 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I managed to make time for a test today.
The filters used by a DCM1 and a DCM10 are indeed different. I'll see if I can post a picture later.

Specs sheet do confirm LR 24dB/oct for both models though, I'm confused.

 |  IP: Logged

Samuel Hynds
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Riverside, CA, USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 08-19-2013 01:12 PM      Profile for Samuel Hynds   Email Samuel Hynds   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
what software/firmware are you using with the DCM10/30?

there was an issue with the orignial software/firmware release dealing with crossovers curves

please visit our site qsccinema.com - look under resources for software releases.

Sam Hynds
Product Specialist, Cinema
QSC Audio Products, LLC

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 08-20-2013 12:29 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello Sam,

The DCP was running the latest software/firmware 3.00.41. I can't remember which FW version the DCM10 was running. I Have DCM Manager 1.20.5 on my laptop, I'll check the FW version and let you know.

Thanks

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.