my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » porthole size recommendation

Author Topic: porthole size recommendation Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-08-2012 08:01 PM                        Subject says it, pretty much. What size portholes are recommended for D-cinema projectors and how far back should the front of the lens sit from the porthole? Specifically, is there any reason why a standard 12"x12" porthole would not be sufficient for an auditorium with a "normal" throw ratio (say, 2.5:1 or longer), a non-excessive projection angle, and in an installation without an anamorphic lens? The only reason why I even bring this up is that most D-cinema projection lenses have significantly larger front elements than film projection lenses. Does that necessitate larger portholes, all other things being equal?  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 10-08-2012 11:40 PM                     One thing to watch for: If the porthole size is underestimated, the installer will end up having to place the projector so close to the glass that it will be difficult or impossible to (a) remove the lens; or (b) open the porthole for cleaning. That is to say, difficult or impossible without moving the projector out of the way. I've had cause to remove my lens at least twice. And I happen to prefer clean port glass. So those are two very good reasons to have some clearance between the lens and the glass. Of course, setting the projector back from the glass means -- a bigger glass -- more money. Which means... small, dirty window eventually..?  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 10-09-2012 12:52 AM                     Remember also when trying to make critical adjustments to the projector such as convergence, Scheimfleug, integrator rod, etc...you will WISH you had larger port windows!  |  IP: Logged Edward Havens Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 614 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Mar 2008 posted 10-09-2012 02:26 AM                     Each of our IMAX digital portholes are IIRC about 26in square, while the remaining digital theatre portholes are about 24in square, not counting the secondary opening porthole to monitor the room from the booth.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 10-09-2012 04:55 AM                     Depends on your specific setup. A standard installation may get away with even smaller portholes. But if you CAN increase the size before installing the machine, it is certainly a good idea. If you want to be prepared for all sorts of 3D options - like Sony 3D or RealD XLS - you should definitly have a large porthole. As others said, the minimum requirement is that you get an easy access to the porthole for cleaning. And that means, easy access to screws, and space for swinging out the glas. 12*12 is already something. The standard 'old-style' portholes in germany are 5*7 - even that would work with a standard 3D D-Cinema installation, e.g. using shutter glases. But it would be painful for the initial lens adjustment. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.