Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Configuring your digital screens, do you prefer to crop to the masking or zoom in?

   
Author Topic: Configuring your digital screens, do you prefer to crop to the masking or zoom in?
Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 04-11-2012 11:24 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Today I swapped an inVision lens out for a Polaroid lens, so I had to redo my flat and scope files. On the scope picture I had to make a choice between filling the screen top to bottom and cropping the sides, or filling side to side and leaving some blank screen at the top of the screen.

For what it's worth, this screen has top movable masking and I did check to see if I had any additional range to lower the masking beyond the existing stop.

Given that the 'aperture' lines are so clean and crisp with the digital picture, I felt that filling side to side and leaving some blank screen at the top was the best solution. If I had gone the other way, I would have had to crop about 15 pixels on either side of the frame.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Elliott
Master Film Handler

Posts: 497
From: Port Orange, Fl USA
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted 04-12-2012 01:39 AM      Profile for Joe Elliott   Email Joe Elliott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been seeing more and more, theaters not even moving masking at all. They just open it up and let it go, since there is reduced personnel in the booth. Bugs the heck out of me. It is sad, but they are saying that customers don't complain, so I guess the general public is getting used to letterboxing on DVD and Blue-ray, so they don't notice or mind it anymore it in theaters.

 |  IP: Logged

Antti Nayha
Master Film Handler

Posts: 268
From: Helsinki, Finland
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 04-12-2012 03:47 AM      Profile for Antti Nayha   Email Antti Nayha   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I like properly adjusted masking, even with the sharp edges of digital. I’m even willing to sacrifice a few pixels to achieve that, in case the masking cannot be perfectly adjusted to the image size.

Justin, cropping 15 pixels from both sides is nothing. You’re losing less than 1,5 percent of the horizontal image area that way. Film producers are using much wider ”safe areas” in picture composition and title placement, so you won’t be losing anything that important.

(Note that top & bottom cropping is less forgiving, because vertical framing/composition tends to be much more exact in cinema – even more so with the widescreen ratios we’re using these times. Still, if necessary, I would probably crop 2*15 pixels vertically to make the picture fit the masking.)

3D is an exception. If the film uses floating windows, no horizontal cropping is allowed at all – period. And even if without floating windows, I find that 3D is a lot less forgiving to horizontal cropping. It’s much more irritating to have an object in the foreground chopped off in a stereo image.

It goes without saying that the best thing to do is to fix the masking to accommodate the exact aspect ratios. But in theaters where this cannot be done for whatever reason, I tend to program different lens settings for 2D and 3D. So that 2D picture fits the masking exactly (cropping the sides a bit), and 3D picture is shown in it’s entirety (leaving some empty screen visible).

Of course, your mileage may vary. In some theatres seeing any empty unmasked screen can be very irritating, in others it’s kind of tolerable. Depends on your screen gain, ambient light levels, overall picture brightness, etc.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Mundell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 04-12-2012 08:39 AM      Profile for Tom Mundell   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Mundell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Elliott
It is sad, but they are saying that customers don't complain, so I guess the general public is getting used to letterboxing on DVD and Blue-ray
Well, I've seen that happen, it drives me nuts, but I've never complained about it; I simply never return to that theater (or auditorium in the case of Imax or AMC's ETX). I think this may have been brought up before, are they really sure lack of complaints means customers don't mind and aren't simply leaving?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-12-2012 12:17 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are a lot of things that the "average person" wouldn't ever notice or even care about if it was pointed out to them, but would drive people like us Film-Techers nuts. I've done a lot of improvements over the years just to make myself happy...when I've told civilians about it, they without fail always say "Oh gee, I never noticed that before!"

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 04-12-2012 01:13 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
True, even if you formatted your digital presentations to a 4:3 TV screen image size and still had mono sound, they prob wouldn't even care.

Like one time, a flat template was used for a scope feature and all was presented in "letterbox" ... and nobody said anything.

Guess, the ball falls back into Justin's court - his choice and let the public make the final call.

To echo Mike's comment: If you don't say anything on what changes you've done - either verbally, or written, they'd never would even notice. But, if a comment was made of the change, then the patrons would wonder "why you had to do the change" and it reflects on your business operations if you had to make it known.

Prob why a lot of cinemas that have done digitial conversion never have advertised it, where a sixplex I know of did do a conversion and really made the splash in the papers about how digital looks so much cleaner without any scratches or fading along with added 7.1 stereo sound.

Bet people were beginning to wonder....

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-12-2012 01:36 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the absense of the option to fix the masking, I would crop the picture to fit. We do this all the time with aperture plates on film projectors (where there is typically zero keystone correction); I see no reason not to do it for video as well.

Note that I am not talking about cropping a 1.85 image to fit a scope screen or the reverse; I am talking about minor adjustments that do not affect the visibility of the safe title area and/or safe action area.

One possiblity (not available in D-cinema, I believe, but do-able with regular SD and HD video) is to stretch or squeeze the image slightly, such as stretching a 1.78 image out to 1.85. Personally, this is something that I would notice immediately and which would drive me insane, but some people do it and don't get complaints.

 |  IP: Logged

John Thomas
Film Handler

Posts: 75
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Sep 2011


 - posted 04-12-2012 02:13 PM      Profile for John Thomas   Email John Thomas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Little slivers of blank screen bug the crap out of me. They scream "not quite perfect." I say fill it vertically and crop the sides, and nobody will notice the difference.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 04-17-2012 08:21 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even with moveable side and bottom maskings I have no objection to tweaking the zoom a bit and redoing the projector maskings file to get everything nice and tight. A bit of cropping is necessary in my case anyway to correct keystone.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.