Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » DVI cable lengths (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: DVI cable lengths
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-19-2009 04:56 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the lenght limit for DVI cable? I know it's not particularly long but someone thought it was only 6 to 10ft. We are going from a Barco scaler to the projector. Can we get away with a cable, say, 15ft? The other alternative would be going to one of those transmitter DVI to CAT5e and then to the receiver CAT5e to DVI boxes. We have found those to be fairly ify, as in sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

It would certainly be easier if we just could deal with a longer DVI cable.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 06-19-2009 11:35 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Officially, the specs of DVI mandate that it to maintain a signal at 5 meters (16 feet), so it should work (and in many cases you can go longer than that too).

 |  IP: Logged

Ronnie Lai
Film Handler

Posts: 6
From: Singapore Singapore singapore
Registered: Apr 2009


 - posted 06-19-2009 12:17 PM      Profile for Ronnie Lai     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There should be some longer length cables for DVI made by Extron, do take a look in their catalogue.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-19-2009 12:37 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
At 35 feet it gets questionable. I have used 35 footers with success, but at 50 feet the signal is definitely degraded beyond use.

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-19-2009 02:29 PM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've successfully used a 50 foot DVI cable with the use of a distribution amplifier. Content was 1280x720, with no sign of signal loss. I think higher resolutions would be more affected.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Minichino
Master Film Handler

Posts: 350
From: Haskell, NJ, USA
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 06-19-2009 02:37 PM      Profile for Robert Minichino   Author's Homepage   Email Robert Minichino   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The biggest factors in the maximum length of a DVI cable run are the resolution and frame rate transmitted (determines the frequency), the cable's capacitance per foot, and the ability of the transmitter to adequately drive the load presented by the cable.

DVI cable capacitance doesn't seem to vary too much, but the drive ability of various DVI devices seems to vary greatly. A distribution amplifier should have a stout output and would generally do better than connecting your long cable directly to the device's output.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Babb
Master Film Handler

Posts: 250
From: Norwich UK
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 06-19-2009 03:02 PM      Profile for Mike Babb   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Babb   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've had problems with 35 footers, relocated the scaler and used 6 footers, no problem at all. I should note that I tried a booster first and it worked intermittently, mostly well but occasionally not for whatever reason.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-20-2009 11:57 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay....here is the scoop...again.

DVI and HDMI rules of thumb... 15' on straight cables with no other electronic means...anything longer and you are gambling, unless you know your cable manufacturer as well as the source and the display since they ALL must be working within their spec.

If your cable manufacturer does not have their prices go up geometrically after 15-feet...be very suspicious. I highly recommend Extron cables as one goes longer as they really do perform as claimed...they are not merely longer cables. Under 15-feet...most cables should work, by design.

So how to break the 15-foot barrier?

There are cable equalizers that will let one use a DVI cable up to about 200-feet! Mind you, that 200' cable is going to set you back many hundreds (if it is worth using) and then you are going to add another $250 or so for the equalizer to make it actually work.

There are the Cat 5 solutions. I can certainly testify that Extron's definitely work though you should/must use SHIELDED Cat 5 cable as well as shielded ends. I've successfully gone nearly 200-feet with them (720p) without problems. It is nice to be able to move both picture and sound (via HDMI) over just two Cat 5e cables. 1080p/60 signals would be limited to just 100-feet though.

If you really want to work long distance...there is but one sure-fire solution...fiber optics. There are solutions from Extron, Gefen and others that will let you go over 1,500 feet. The tooling is still a bit pricey to make one's own fiber ends but there are sources for pre-terminated fiber optic cables. Then again, with bandwidths going up...having the ability to make fiber cables is going to be essential.

Depending on the source...one could convert DVI to HDSDI and run just a single RG-6 cable too. I like HDSDI...great images, easy to work with cable, not too costly, can have video and audio over the same cable.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 06-20-2009 07:29 PM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you're only looking to get 720p you might be better of using coax. You can easily go under 100ft with RG6 or RG59 coax cables, this is also a lot cheaper than buying a high quality DVI or HDMI cable.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-21-2009 06:15 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Providing you have an analog version of the signal...sometimes there is only the DVI version. There is nothing wrong with using analog and the cabling is, at present, easier to work with and can certainly go a decent length.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 06-27-2009 07:23 PM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just wanted to put up a link to an article about HDMI cables.

Long HDMI Cable Bench Tests

It's an interesting read, however, when you're finished reading it you'll probably find that you have more questions than answers...

If you look through the collection of articles they have, they do have some very interesting reading on other topics that would be related to other aspects of cinema equipment.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 06-28-2009 05:01 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, a lot of these "audiophiles" sites/magazines/tests want to insist on the notion that a $10 cable is "worse" than a $1000 cable and that they can hear/see the difference.

And sometimes they'll even argue POWER cables, that hook say an amplifier to the plug in your house, make a huge difference.

But after all the hoola, and considering how they "spent months" readying their "experiment", the conclusions are pretty much what everybody should know by now.

In my own words: "for short lenghts, say under 12 feet, any non defective cable, manufactured to meet the intended specs, will produce 100% perfect indistinguishable results". Over that, you need to start worrying about specs A BIT. Over around +35 feet and you REALLY need to worry about specs. Specs DOES NOT equal price and there is no need for any cable, no matter how long, to be too expensive, although they often are, but only because of mark up, not because of true cost, but you can find cheap ones that do just the same job.

And in their words in this article:

quote:
Your take-away from all this should be the following:

At lengths less than 4 meters you can just about use silly string (OK, not really) and get HDMI to pass at any current resolution. At less than 3 meters you'll even extend that to 12-bit color and possibly the next crazy idea HDMI Licensing decides to throw at consumers. Don't spend a lot on these cables and if you want to save money you won't let anyone at a big box store talk you into buying from them.
At long lengths (over 10 meters) you really need to pay attention to the manufacturer if you don't want to risk running into potential problems with 1080p and future formats such as Deep Color. With that said, just about any cable at or under 10 meters will pass 720p/1080i and nearly everyone will pass 1080p at 8-bit color as well.
If you have an existing HDMI cable and are running into problems, we'd suggest at least attempting the insertion of an active component at the sink (display) side. This is going to be far cheaper than ripping out your walls and re-running new cables - and likely just as effective.
HDMI has proven to be a moving target and there is no telling what crazy (likely unnecessary) format they will try to push down the cable next. Due to this, it's always good to "overbuild" your cable install, especially if it's a longer distance and going to end up behind drywall.
If you're not prone to upgraditis and think 1080p will be your maximum resolution for the life of your install, don't sweat it...

Of course there are entire industries, magazines, and leagues of people that breathe on expensive cables, so they are gonna tell you otherwise. Oh well, only thing at stake is money if they are chosen to be believed.

 |  IP: Logged

Geena Phillips
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 198
From: Norcross, GA / USA
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 06-28-2009 01:45 PM      Profile for Geena Phillips   Author's Homepage   Email Geena Phillips   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BTW, I recently found a website with REALLY good cable prices.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-28-2009 03:23 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just keep in mind when reading the magazine "tests and experiments" that magazines are shills for their advertisers.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 06-29-2009 01:10 AM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's important to note that in the link I posted above, when they're spewing out the results they ended up showing that some of the uber high-end uber expensive cables were less reliable than some of the middle class cables. It seems they feel that noise reduction circuitry within the a/v gear has more of an impact than the cables in some cases... which would explain some of the quality differences i've seen doing residential installs. Maybe bargain priced TV's and dvd players are the real issue.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.