Topic: "RoboCop" 30th anniversary
Phenomenal Film Handler
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
posted 07-17-2017 03:54 PM
He's Still Not Stopping For Donuts!: Remembering "RoboCop" On Its 30th Anniversary
HE’S STILL NOT STOPPING FOR DONUTS!: REMEMBERING “ROBOCOP” ON ITS 30TH ANNIVERSARY
By Michael Coate
“In many ways, RoboCop was ahead of its time, foreshadowing a future that is with us now. The Reagan-era gap between rich and poor has grown ever wider, with the 1% using an increasingly militarized police force to protect gentrified communities while other parts of cities have become postindustrial wastelands, abandoned to crime and drugs. RoboCop himself, a man made over into a machine by an unfeeling corporation, can be seen as a literal example of American workers being replaced by robots.” — Film scholar and Paul Verhoeven author Douglas Keesey
The Digital Bits and History, Legacy & Showmanship are pleased to present this retrospective commemorating the 30th anniversary of the release of RoboCop, Paul Verhoeven’s (Soldier of Orange, Basic Instinct) franchise-inspiring and Saturn- and Oscar-winning satirical action film starring Peter Weller (The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai, Leviathan) and Nancy Allen (Dressed to Kill, Blow Out).
RoboCop, which also featured Ronny Cox, Kurtwood Smith and Miguel Ferrer, opened in theaters 30 years ago this week. For the occasion The Bits features a compilation of statistics, trivia and box-office data that places the movie’s performance in context; passages from vintage film reviews; a reference/historical listing of the film’s Dolby SR presentations; and, finally, an interview segment with RoboCop: The Definitive History author Calum Waddell, who discuss the virtues and influence of RoboCop.
1 = Box-office rank among movies in the RoboCop franchise (adjusted for inflation)
1 = Number of Academy Awards (special achievement)
1 = Rank among top-earning movies during opening weekend
2 = Number of weeks nation’s top-grossing movie (weeks 1-2)
2 = Rank among top-earning movies of Orion’s 1987 slate
2 = Rank among top-earning science-fiction movies of 1987
2 = Number of Academy Award nominations
3 = Number of theatrical sequels & remakes
7 = Number of months between theatrical release and home-video release
8 = Rank among top-earning movies of 1987 (summer)
9 = Rank among top-earning R-rated films of 1987
12 = Number of Dolby SR presentations
16 = Rank among top-earning movies of 1987
1,580 = Number of opening-week engagements
$39.95 = Suggested retail price of initial home video release (LaserDisc & S-VHS)
$49.95 = Suggested retail price of Criterion CLV LaserDisc
$89.95 = Suggested retail price of initial home video release (VHS and Beta)
$124.95 = Suggested retail price of Criterion CAV LaserDisc
$5,068 = Opening-weekend per-screen average
$8.0 million = Opening-weekend box-office gross
$13.0 million = Production cost
$17.2 million = Opening-weekend box-office gross (adjusted for inflation)
$24.1 million = Box-office rental
$28.0 million = Production cost (adjusted for inflation)
$51.9 million = Box-office rental (adjusted for inflation)
$53.4 million = Box-office gross
$115.1 million = Box-office gross (adjusted for inflation)
$168.4 million = Box-office gross (RoboCop franchise)
$279.9 million = Box-office gross (RoboCop franchise; adjusted for inflation)
A SAMPLING OF MOVIE REVIEWER QUOTES
“This is sort of an urban Rambo by way of Dr. Strangelove.” — Christopher Hicks, (Salt Lake City) Deseret News
“Although the film recalls Blade Runner, Verhoeven doesn’t have Ridley Scott’s painterly eye. But he does have a wicked sense of humor. And the screenplay by Edward Neumeier and Michael Miner, which owes a debt to both The Terminator and Isaac Asimov’s novel I, Robot, is a perfect example of an American movie that Americans don’t make very often.” — James Verniere, The Boston Herald
“Try as they will, the moviemakers just can't seem to come up with another Terminator, which more and more looks like the milestone movie in the genre of flicks about cyborg types — part human, part machine fellows who really like to kill people any which way they can. Robocop is (to put it optimistically) a
halfway no-good example of the form.” — Peter Stack, San Francisco Chronicle
“RoboCop is a Superman for the ’80’s. The best action film since The Terminator.” — Jack Mathews, Detroit Free Press
“The fine Dutch director Paul Verhoeven presents what could have been another high-tech assault picture with fresh visuals and a refreshing sense of humor, especially about big business.” — Gene Siskel, Chicago Tribune
“RoboCop is an excellent example of how lousy a movie can be if its makers can’t quite figure out what they want to accomplish.” — Eric E. Harrison, (Little Rock) Arkansas Democrat
“If it’s violence you’re after, Robocop gives full value. In his first American movie, Paul Verhoeven, a Dutch director (Soldier of Orange), doesn’t let the furiously futuristic plot get in the way of the flaming explosions, shattering glass and hurtling bodies.” — Walter Goodman, The New York Times
“Big-budget action movies have seemed so bone-headed recently that the cleverness of Paul Verhoeven’s RoboCop may startle you. Despite a level of lurid violence that may offend many, this movie has a motor humming inside. It’s been assembled with ferocious, gleeful expertise, crammed with humor, cynicism and jolts of energy. In many ways, it’s the best action movie of the year.” — Michael Wilmington, Los Angeles Times
“[T]he laughs never play properly within RoboCop’s unrepentently grim context. Verhoeven never lets you forget that making a violent, commercial film is nasty business. RoboCop is very nasty business, indeed.” — Ron Base, Toronto Star
“[I]t’s difficult to watch a Verhoeven movie without feeling that the man was born to direct. He handles action sequences brilliantly, he brings wit to the most unpromising dialogue scenes, and he tends to push actors into territory they haven’t explored before (Peter Weller and Ronny Cox are both cast against type in RoboCop, and they’ve never been better). Most obviously, he has a personal vision that can accommodate itself to commercial genres without compromising. It’s a mystery why it’s taken Hollywood so long to discover him.” — John Hartl, The Seattle Times
“Most thriller and special-effects movies come right off the assembly line. You can call out every development in advance, and usually be right. RoboCop is a thriller with a difference.” — Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
“[E]ven as it slams you against the wall, it’s tickling your ribs.” — David Ansen, Newsweek
“Move over, Superman: Make way for RoboCop, the man of steel who’s really a man of steel. It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s a…humandroid!” — Carrie Rickey, Philadelphia Inquirer
“[RoboCop] is a finely crafted movie adorned by splendid special effects — the blood looks fresh when the bullets fly, and the workings of RoboCop, created and designed by Rob Bottin with robotic movement by Moni Yakim, are a marvel. But this story of robotic revenge and corporate corruption is a cold tale, which, aside from gripping and shaking the viewer with its scenes of violent action — or are they scenes of active violence? — leaves the viewer strangely detached.” — Diana West, The Washington Times
“RoboCop is a comic book movie that’s definitely not for kids. The welding of extreme violence with four-letter words is tempered with gut-level humor and technical wizardry.” — Variety
“RoboCop is like a nasty comic book you take guilty pleasure in, but can’t put down. It is violent, preposterous and ugly, but it’s impossible to be bored by it.” — George Anderson, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
THE SPECTRAL RECORDING ENGAGEMENTS
Orion’s RoboCop was the first title announced to be released in Dolby’s 35mm Spectral Recording (SR) format, though it was actually the second title released. (Amblin/Warner Bros.’ Innerspace beat it to market by two weeks. And a year earlier the SR technology was tested on a couple of 70mm-magnetic prints of Paramount’s Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home.)
The SR format was identical to the standard A-type optical Dolby Stereo format in terms of spatial characteristics, number of channels, print type, and the manner in which the matrix encode/decode process worked. It was superior, however, in terms of sonic characteristics and overall fidelity.
Dolby SR was intended to be a lower-cost alternative to the expensive (but spectacular sounding) 70mm six-track magnetic format and, long term, a replacement for the A-type format. But then digital sound was developed. (But that’s another story.)
The known Dolby SR presentations of RoboCop were…
Los Angeles — Mann’s Chinese Triplex [THX]
Los Angeles — Mann’s Village [THX]
San Francisco — UA’s Galaxy 4-plex [THX]
Universal City — Cineplex Odeon’s Universal City 18-plex [THX]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Washington — Circle’s Embassy Circle
Calumet City — Cineplex Odeon’s River Oaks 8-plex
Hillside — M&R’s Hillside Square 6-plex
Dearborn — UA’s The Movies at Fairlane 10-plex
New York — Cineplex Odeon’s National Twin
New York — Loews’ 34th Street Showplace Triplex
New York — Loews’ Orpheum Twin
Portland — Luxury Theatres’ Lloyd 10-plex [THX]
Calum Waddell is the author of RoboCop: The Definitive History (Titan, 2014). He runs High Rising Productions and has produced and directed numerous documentaries and Value Added Material for DVD and Blu-ray releases. He was a producer on American Grindhouse (2010) and the director of Slice and Dice: The Slasher Film Forever (2012). His other books include Minds of Fear: A Dialogue with 30 Modern Masters of Horror! (Luminary, 2005), Tattoo Breakers: 18 Films That Courted Controversy and Created a Legend (Telos, 2008), Jack Hill: The Exploitation and Blaxploitation Master, Film by Film (McFarland, 2008), and Cannibal Holocaust (Devil’s Advocates series, Columbia, 2016). He has also written numerous articles that have appeared in Dreamwatch, Fangoria, Impact and Neo.
Michael Coate (The Digital Bits): In what way should RoboCop be remembered on its 30th anniversary?
Calum Waddell: I think it should be remembered as a classic piece of sci-fi cinema and a very astute critique of neo-liberalism during the era of Reagan and Thatcher. It is also a wonderful and amusing look at America's place in the world during a time when it was clear, I think, that the hard power of the White House had lost its ability to influence world politics — and, prophetically, the Berlin Wall fell less just two and a half years later without any input from the United States — but domestic politics were obviously becoming strained between the very rich and the very poor. Of all the sci-fi films made during the 1980s, RoboCop is undoubtedly the smartest, most satiric and most socio-political of all of the big blockbusters to come from the Hollywood studio system. It remains a masterpiece — it is Frankenstein for a new generation and really powerful, hilarious and quite gut-wrenching stuff.
Coate: When did you first see RoboCop and what did you think of it?
Waddell: I saw it as a kid, far too young to understand what it was even speaking about. The techno-phobic aspect of it sort of registered with me but, really, it was just a movie with lots of violence and cool stuff. It's a film that caught on with the wrong market — as a child I invested in the comic books too, and then the rubbish 1990 sequel, but that's the way it goes, isn't it? It was a film that was actually quite adult but it just took off with the young 'uns!
Coate: Where do you think RoboCop ranks among Paul Verhoeven’s body of work?
Waddell: It's my favorite of his films by a country mile. Verhoeven is a very singular and intelligent filmmaker, obviously not without some fuck-ups — such as Showgirls — but when he is on form he is really quite excellent. I think RoboCop has been his best attempt at bringing his original art house style, which is quite cold and clinical, to the American mainstream.
Coate: How effective or memorable a hero was Peter Weller’s Murphy/RoboCop and where do you think that performance ranks among Weller’s body of work?
Waddell: He is a hero in the narrative but, of course, he is programmed to be a fascist. The influence of Judge Dredd is there. RoboCop is, and try not to forget this, a literal puppet for the state — he is programmed to brutally arrest and violate the physical rights of suspects. I don't think he is a hero — he is portrayed as one but it is our job to remind ourselves “this is really fucked up.” In terms of performance, Weller has never been better.
Coate: How memorable a villain was Ronny Cox’s Dick Jones (and/or Kurtwood Smith’s Clarence J. Boddicker)?
Waddell: The entire cast is brilliant and you left out Nancy Allen, who is a really underrated actress. She makes the film work because she offers a ray of light and normalcy.
Coate: Can you compare and contrast the original RoboCop with its sequels, spin-offs and remake?
Waddell: The first sequel begins well and then half way through loses its sense of satire, politics and direction. It's a moral clusterfuck of a film but with an arch right winger like Frank Miller on screenwriting duties, it was probably never going to end well. The less said about the third film the better — although I do think Fred Dekker is an excellent director, witness Night of the Creeps and The Monster Squad, and he was on to a bum deal from the start. The lower production values and kid friendly ideology really sinks the film. The remake was about as good as anyone could have hoped for but, yes, of course, that still does not mean it was any good — I never felt the desire to watch it again. I thought the original TV series was fun for what it was. Prime Directives is actually fairly interesting — it is not a great effort by any means but it gets a few things right that the sequels and remake did not and it at least honors the original politics of the first film.
Coate: What is the legacy of RoboCop?
Waddell: RoboCop will never die and probably continue to inspire remakes and sequels to remakes and spin-off ideas for a long time to come!
Coate: Thank you, Calum, for sharing your thoughts on RoboCop on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of its release.
Selected images copyright/courtesy The Criterion Collection, MGM Home Entertainment, Orion Pictures.
The primary references for this project were regional newspaper coverage and trade reports published in Billboard, Boxoffice, The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. All figures and data included in this article pertain to the United States and Canada except where stated otherwise.
Don Beelik, John Hazelton, Bobby Henderson, Doug Keesey, Mary Schaff and Calum Waddell, and to the San Francisco Public Library and Washington State Library.
Daniel O’Herlihy (“The Old Man”), 1919-2005
Basil Poledouris (Music), 1945-2006
Robert DoQui (“Sergeant Warren Reed”), 1934-2008
Spencer Prokop (“Gas Station Attendant”), 1957-2009
Jerry Haynes (“Dr. McNamara”), 1927-2011
Mario Machado (“Casey Wong”), 1935-2013
Miguel Ferrer (“Bob Morton”), 1955-2017
| IP: Logged
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
Powered by Infopop Corporation
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.