Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Robocop - Remastered Unrated Director's Cut (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Robocop - Remastered Unrated Director's Cut
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-22-2014 08:41 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Finally, a Blu-ray version of Robocop worth buying has arrived on store shelves.

Most F-T participants are already familiar with story line of Robocop. For me it was one of those surprise hit movies. The previews made it seem really stupid, but it turned out to be quite an entertaining flick. The first time I watched it I sat through it twice at the Loews 34th East Six theater in Manhattan. The mix of comedy, satire, unflinching graphic violence and a really odd sensibility wrapped around an entertaining revenge story was a winning combination.

I could be wrong, but I think the upcoming remake, sanitized in PG-13 packaging, is probably going to suck. At the very least it won't have the same kind of impact as the original film.

Previously three other versions of Robocop have been released on Blu-ray, all using a very sub-par video transfer. I avoided buying any of those versions, sticking with my old Criterion Collection DVD. The new Blu-ray is sourced from a new 4K master, created with a 4K scan of the original camera negative.

The new Blu-ray looks a hell of a lot better. The image quality is not perfect, but the color, contrast and level of detail is pretty satisfying in most shots and vastly superior to DVD. The picture is sharp enough you can clearly some some errors (like the camera catching the "dead" Murphy on the hospital table blinking his eye). There is a lot of film grain in many camera shots. I checked the bit rate display on my PS3 and saw the level averaging 28 Mb/s.

The only area where the picture falters: the violent clips not originally included in the theatrical cut. I can only imagine those pieces of film were not stored very well. Perhaps only so much could be done (technology limits or budget constraints) to improve the look of those clips.

The new Blu-ray of Robocop features only the "unrated director's cut." I had hoped there would be a seamless branching option between the theatrical cut and unrated cut. DTS Master Audio 5.1 is the only English language option. It doesn't replicate the original Dolby SR optical mix.

The sound mix is pretty good. The mix isn't nearly as dynamic as those from movies originally made with 5.1 digital in mind. But it has a lot of discrete activity in all the sound channels and a few good panning effects too. The movie won a special achievement Academy Award in sound effects editing and was also nominated for the Best Sound Oscar. It was also Oscar nominated for film editing.

Some places, such as Best Buy and Amazon, have been offering the new Blu-ray at prices below $10. Other stores may have it priced higher, but also may be including coupons worth $7.50 to see the remake of Robocop hitting theaters February 12.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 01-22-2014 10:08 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched Robocop and Robocop for the first time in probably 20+ years. I thought both movies were just plane awful. The dialog was pathetic, the acting was horrible, and the story lines were weak. Plus the way the visuals were done looked very fake.

Perhaps part of my perspective comes from watching them in the 2014 context. I'm sure I liked them more when I was in my teens or early 20's, but not enough that I was ever a fan.

As far as the update, I don't think there was anything in the movies that necessitated being done as an R rated film - especially since this is not a shot by shot remake. I found the violence to be more cartoonish than graphic. And other than that it was mostly language that cause the R rating.

I will say that story in Robocop 2 is probably more relevant in 2014, in a post Citizens United era, where big business really does have great political power.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2014 11:32 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked Robocop. I found very little to like in Robocop 2. I never bothered watching Robocop 3. For those who did like the 1987 version of Robocop, I recommend the new Blu-ray. The bargain price makes it an even better deal.

quote: Justin Hamaker
As far as the update, I don't think there was anything in the movies that necessitated being done as an R rated film - especially since this is not a shot by shot remake.
The original Robocop from 1987 was very well known for its graphic violence. It was not a movie for kids. The MPAA gave the original cut an X rating. Paul Verhoven, Jon Davison & editor Frank J. Urioste trimmed a few scenes repeatedly to get an R rating. An animatronic model of Peter Weller's upper body was built to show Murphy getting shot through the head. Most of that dolly shot ended up on the cutting room floor. That footage was restored in the "unrated" version. The violence that remained in the R-rated cut was still pretty jarring -like Murphy's hand getting blown off with a shotgun. I think Paul Verhoven got a bit more lee-way with the MPAA when he made Total Recall, a much bigger budget project. BTW I thought the remake of that movie sucked.

With the remake of Robocop carrying a PG-13 rating, presumably so parents can bring their kids to the movie, it's not going to have anywhere near the impact of the original. This will probably be another movie to add to a long line of polished, bigger budget yet completely forgettable remakes. Worse yet, the sanitized PG-13 violence of the remake may do more to show violence being fun and without consequence. No blood, no mess.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-23-2014 02:07 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have procured the new Robocop Blu-ray as well. This is the best result of the new movie coming out. I knew they'd make a new Blu-ray. Now what other movies need remakes so they can remaster and re-release the superior originals?

This is the first time I had ever seen the director's cut and honestly I didn't notice anything different or more violent.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2014 02:57 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the unrated cut ED-209 shot Mr. Kinney over 100 times. In the R-rated cut he shot Mr. Kinney only about 50 times.
[Big Grin]

The R-rated cut didn't have the tech people trying to yank ribbon cables out of IC boards either. Obviously a big plot hole in that board room scene: if they were just running a little test in front of the executives why would they load ED-209 with real bullets? In that instance if ED-209 noticed his guns were loaded with blanks or not loaded at all he could have ran over and smashed Mr. Kinney with one of his gun arms. Maybe they'll have that joke in the remake.
[Razz]

The most stuff was cut from (and later restored to) the scene where Murphy gets shot all to hell by Clarence Boddicker and his racially diverse team of bad guys. All of the restored footage looks pretty terrible grafted in with the stuff from the R-rated cut.

There's a tiny bit more graphic footage restored where Robocop stabs the main bad guy in the neck with the pointy data I/O thingie on his hand.

quote: Joe Redifer
Now what other movies need remakes so they can remaster and re-release the superior originals?
They might have to go the remake route to get any Blu-ray discs at all out of The Abyss and True Lies. More Terminator movies have been made and new ones are in the works, yet that Blu-ray is kind of "meh" in the image quality department.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-23-2014 03:06 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw ROBOCOP when it was first released in 1987 at the cinema complex at Universal Studio's theme park in LA. Dolby SR was the latest thing in sound at the time and no Hawaii theatres had it so I am glad I had the opportunity to see the movie at that Los Angeles theatre with the sound I too enjoyed the movie very much and got the DVD and Laserdisc but never bothered to get the Blu a Ray because of the poor reviews I kept reading about the picture quality . I was overjoyed when I learned about the new BD made from a brand new 4k scan from the original camera negative and ordered it from Amazon and my copy should arrive any day now.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 01-23-2014 03:16 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Claude S. Ayakawa
I saw ROBOCOP when it was first released in 1987 at the cinema complex at Universal Studio's theme park in LA. Dolby SR was the latest thing in sound at the time
I think there is some great debate over at bluray.com in whether the original bluray used the info from the 6 track magnetic tracks from the release in 70mm back in 87. I think the 70mm release in 87 is also for debate as well. I wonder if the audio from this release is the same as the original bluray.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2014 03:36 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe Michael Coate can weigh in on this. I distinctly remember the original 1987 theatrical release. There were no 70mm engagements advertised in New York City. A couple or so theaters had Robocop playing in 35mm Dolby SR. The theater where I watched it had at least 2 or more screens equipped with 70mm (I watched Black Rain in 70mm at that venue). I watched it in 35mm Dolby SR optical.

I don't remember Robocop having any 70mm engagements advertised in the Los Angeles market either. If 70mm prints were made they must have been made later for the movie's European release.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-23-2014 04:17 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Weighing in...

I can confirm there were no advertised 70mm presentations of RoboCop in any of the major U.S. markets that typically played 70mm when prints were available. I saw it first-run at Mann's Chinese in a 35mm Dolby Spectral Recording presentation.

FWIW, RoboCop is listed as 70mm in Dolby's master records. But...lots of titles were mixed in six-track with the intention of getting a 70mm release that ultimately got released only in 35mm. And...those records make no distinction for language...and it wasn't uncommon for American-made movies to get a 70mm release internationally but not domestically.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 01-23-2014 05:11 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know this debate rages on elsewhere, Criterion claims that the original source is a 2-Track Dolby Stereo 35mm magnetic master. Those on other forums believe there was a split surround 6 track made for 70mm releases. Others say that the split surround was never made. I have yet to see any evidence that there was in fact a 70mm release. The debate goes on.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-23-2014 10:07 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's the "about the transfer" verbiage from my Criterion Collection DVD:

quote: Criterion
ROBOCOP is presented in its director-approved aspect ratio of 1.66:1. This new digital transfer was created from the pristine 35mm interpositive and the original 35mm 2-track Dolby Surround® stereo magnetic master.
I had already thought Robocop never had any 70mm prints. The Criterion DVD did more to firm my beliefs about that. I've seen some of the Dolby lists Michael mentioned and wondered about some of those titles.

Dances With Wolves was one in particular that had no 70mm prints in its original North American release (BTW this was another Orion release that went out 35mm Dolby SR optical as its best print in the US). Yet I've heard people talk about 70mm prints existing for that one. And that could be true considering how much more dynamic the 5.1 mix was on the 2-disc DTS DVD. But still, I'd like to see some 70mm ads of that one, as well as Robocop.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 01-24-2014 12:37 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That verbiage is the exact same working from the Criterion laserdisc, the dvd used the same laserdisc transfer.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-24-2014 11:03 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
More Terminator movies have been made and new ones are in the works, yet that Blu-ray is kind of "meh" in the image quality department.
I saw a remastered Blu-ray right next to the remastered Robocop in the store. I couldn't tell if it has the original mono track... probably not. Not sure if it was really remastered or not.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-25-2014 03:06 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't have any of the Terminator movies on Blu-ray yet. I guess I would have to look closely at what is included on the disc before buying. My Terminator DVD has both the original mono mix and the 5.1 remix.

I kind of have a preference for the mono track on the first Terminator movie only because the sound effects in that cut were what I was used to hearing. The 5.1 remix is extremely different and not really good different. For instance, I realize they used the "Dirty Harry" .44 Magnum sound effect for the Terminator's .45 Longslide sidearm in the original mix (and reused the same sound effect for a different revolver later). But that's what was in the original mix. The newer 5.1 remix had handgun sound effects that didn't sound anything like a .45 handgun at all. Not even close. Honestly, I've never heard any handgun sound like that ever.

There was one part in T2 where Linda Hamilton was firing a .45 into an office ceiling and the "pop" from that handgun actually sounded realistic.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Putlack
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Registered: Sep 2011


 - posted 02-01-2014 02:04 AM      Profile for Michael Putlack   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Putlack   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fun fact: Robocop was the first R Rated movie I ever saw. It was at my cousin's house on VHS when I was probably 10 or 11.

The first PG-13 movie I ever saw was Jurassic Park when I was probably 10 as well.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.