Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » 4K TVs coming

   
Author Topic: 4K TVs coming
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 05-23-2011 03:19 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Both of these links are old. Guess I wasn't paying much attention at the time (I was out of work for a year during that period). Anyways, it looks like 4K at home is much closer to the home theater market than I thought. Guess I should quit buying any more Blu-rays for now... [Roll Eyes]

From 2009: Want a 4K TV? Sony Has a $76,000 Set with Your Name on It
quote:
Adam Frucci, Gizmodo

Regular HDTV is so last year. What you really need is a 4k TV, one with four times the resolution of HD. And hey, Sony's new TRIMASTER offers just that, for a price.

Yes, this $76,583, 56-inch set sports a resolution of 3840x2160, which means you can cram four full-res HD feeds in there at one time. You know, for watching four football games at once, or four movies at once. Samsung announced a similar, larger set a couple years ago, but as far as we know it never actually became a real product. This thing is all real.

Sure, this thing isn't meant for normal consumers, as the price makes it clear. But that doesn't mean you can't get one if you have the scratch. Come on, go for it. It's only $76,000. [AV Watch via Engadget]

From 2008: Samsung Demos 63-inch 4K Plasma Display
quote:
At the FPD International show held in Japan, the division of Samsung has demonstrated its plasma screen 63 inches with a resolution of 4096×2160 pixels, more commonly known as 4K in the industry. The company has been able to accomplish this feat by reducing the size of each pixel, now 0.339mmx0.363mm (0.13×0.14 cm) by rationalizing the structure of the barrier rib and review of the transparent electrode and the bus electrode . These pixels are less than half the typical size of a pixel in a modern 63-inch, 1920×1080 HDTV.

Other Features Little is known about the Samsung, including the thickness of the panel, but the larger screen with a pixel size of superfine including prototypes using similar technology, such as Pioneer, Sharp and Japan Broadcasting Corp. (NHK), which constructed sample of 20 inches or less.

Many people think that 4K is the future of HD, which offers four times the definition of a modern 1080p HDTV, also equivalent to about nine million pixels.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-23-2011 03:39 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess I'll wait for 16K. No wait, 256K will be much better. For that matter, why not wait five years and go with 65536K which will make the TV picture look more real than normal human eyesight would if you were seeing the stuff in front of you.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-25-2011 11:51 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I could find use in a 4K TV set as a big computer monitor. Outside of that? Nah.

2K is still the de facto standard for motion picture post production (very few movies have their CGI, digital intermediates and any other miscellaneous materials natively rendered in 4K). As more and more emphasis gets placed on muscling movies into home living rooms as fast as possible there is even less reason to shoot any higher than 2K in post production.

1080p is pretty much it for a long time when it comes to home TV viewing standards. Over the air broadcast certainly isn't going past 1080i/60 and 720p/60 anytime soon. I don't see Blu-ray supporting 4K ever. Really if the compression level is going to be ramped up to extremely severe levels to fit 4K on there the loss of image detail through severe compression makes the effort laughably worthless.

As for streaming movies online, that's a joke in terms of driving image quality stanards. Online streaming is really only giving SD DVD a run for its money now. The HD quality with online streaming is inferior to all forms of cable and OTA broadcast and not even comparable to Blu-ray. This situation is going to persist for a long time while telephone and cable companies throw as much of their money into mobile phone infrastructure as possible and hardly anything into beefing up primary residential Internet access quality. Basically we need average sustained bit rates of well over 30 million bits per second for 1080p Blu-ray quality and quite a bit more than that for 4K streamed video that really looks like 4K to be feasible.

But it's nice the electronics companies are at least trying to build the TV sets.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-26-2011 11:13 AM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw a clip on youtube not too long ago about an 8K monitor...

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-27-2011 08:20 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, what would a normal person watch on something like this? Test patterns?

Unless and until there is 4k software available to home users, a 4k TV set is pretty useless, except maybe to a sports fan who wants to watch four HD broadcasts at the same time (never mind that four smaller HD sets would be cheaper than a single 4K set).

A 4K computer monitor would actually be useful to many people, however.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-27-2011 11:18 PM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I imagine there will be a successor to the Blu Ray format that will provide 4K resolution. Perhaps the capacity for this new disc will be 500GB or even 1TB. At that point, 4K will probably be the standard output resolution of movie production.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-28-2011 08:37 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I am with Michael. Blu-ray isn't going away anytime soon (just like DVD is still the prominent format), but I would welcome a 4K consumer format if they would do a better job with the compression. I find most blu-rays look nowhere near as good as they should. The Baraka blu-ray and most Disney animated blu-rays look excellent, but whoever is designing these new formats damn well needs to understand compression is everything. Heck, I would take 2K uncompressed ANY DAY over 4K or higher with compression.

Does anyone here have U-Verse HD tv service? My god that shit is awful! I was visiting my parents last week and was talking about how terrible the compression was. They didn't understand because "it was HD, how could it not be good". [Roll Eyes] I then got them to fire up their old VHS deck connected to the new fancy HD tv that they had U-Verse running on it. The VHS tape really did look better, even to their eyes.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.