Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: DVD: This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2006)

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Community » The Afterlife » DVD: This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2006)

Author

Topic: DVD: This Film Is Not Yet Rated (2006)

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 03-24-2007 02:33 AM

I didn't get to see Kirby Dick's documentary, This Film Is Not Yet Rated when it played in theaters, because no theaters near where I live played it. A significant number of movie theater chains will not carry movies tagged with a NC-17 rating or left "unrated" and still in NC-17 judged form.

This is an awesome documentary. I already had a pretty negative opinion of the MPAA and its long history of strange contradiction and inconsistency in its ratings on movies. This Film Is Not Yet Rated really deepened those negative feelings past the level of disgust.

I think the MPAA's methods in how it rates movies needs to be absolutely gutted and restructured. This documentary not only shows what the MPAA is doing to be unconstitutional in a number of respects, but one can also make a very solid case of monopolist violations of anti-trust laws. It's very revealing to find how the MPAA is in collusion with major Hollywood studios and that their films are often treated very differently than those from independent studios.

It's probably just as anger inspiring to see how the folks who rate the movies have little criteria or precedent from which to operate. Basically they're just issuing snap judgments on movies based on their gut feeling and little more. Worst of all, they don't require any expert qualification. All they have to be are parents (and not all are even that).

One of the most embarrassing aspects of American popular culture is our fascination and glorification of violence. We don't seem to have much of a problem with it. But sex is BAD! Gay sex is really really BAD! I laughed at the part where Kimberly Pierce, director of Boys Don't Cry, talked about why the MPAA slapped her film with a NC-17 rating. Certain bits of lesbian sex is what did it. Not the part with Brandon getting shot in the head with his/her brains splattering on the wall.

Probably the most fuck-tarded practice exposed in this documentary is how the MPAA flat out refuses to allow any filmmaker to bring up similar scenes in other movies as part of the appeals process. Basically, it sounds like the MPAA deliberately doesn't care about maintaining any consistency on the ratings it provides. And that makes me suspicious of their intentions in that. It makes me wonder if they're not using that as a tool to keep independent studios held at a disadvantage.

Independent films often explore more controversial material than what major studios are willing to market. However the majors don't want some low budget cultural sensation to be gobbling up lots of available theater screens if they can do anything about it. If the show gets slapped with a NC-17, it's a marketing death sentence. Major theater chains like Carmike Cinemas will not carry any NC-17 rated movies. Many TV stations and newspapers will not run ads for NC-17 rated movies. If those broad policy bans were not in place the NC-17 wouldn't be such a bad deal. Right now, especially after seeing this documentary, the NC-17 rating and how it is treated demands serious change.

Now, I'm sure this DVD probably looks a good bit different than it did in movie theaters. The documentary maintains a video look (for once) on its own footage. Audio is Dolby Digital 2.0, with much of it being dialog just coming from the center channel. No one's going to watch this movie looking for home theater demo material. That's not the point.

| IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 03-24-2007 04:09 AM

An excerpt from: Schindler's List: My 2006 Top Ten

quote:
7. THIS FILM IS NOT YET RATED by Kirby Dick

In this documentary, Dick reveals that the Motion Picture Association of America is even more evil than it appears to be. It’s very informative and loads of fun as the filmmaker infiltrates the all-powerful cultish entity and uses its ridiculous system to his advantage.

| IP: Logged

Chad M Calpito
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: San Diego, CA
Registered: Apr 2006

posted 03-24-2007 10:59 AM

I agree with you completely on this movie, Bobby. I most certainly enjoyed this film as well.

| IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005

posted 03-30-2007 06:09 PM

[QUOTE Bobby Henderson] It's very revealing to find how the MPAA is in collusion with major Hollywood studios and that their films are often treated very differently than those from independent studios. [/QUOTE]

Could that be because the MPAA is a trade organization whose members are the six major studios? Of course it can.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.