my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Super-Bit DVD's (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Super-Bit DVD's William Leland III Master Film Handler Posts: 336 From: Charleston, SC, Registered: Aug 2002 posted 06-12-2004 11:30 PM                        i was wondering what the opinion's on Super-Bit dvd's good, bad, not worth the extra money? i have never heard one, but have had friends say they are worth it. i know columbia house is the only maker so far, and they have maybe 50 titles out. does anyone here use them or have an opinion about Super-bit dvd's?  |  IP: Logged Pravin Ratnam Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 844 From: Atlanta, GA,USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 06-13-2004 02:23 AM                     I am guessing the benefits would be more obvious on big tvs. If you have no intention of buying a huge tv, then i would not base the decision on the superbit factor alone.  |  IP: Logged Paul Linfesty Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1383 From: Bakersfield, CA, USA Registered: Nov 1999 posted 06-13-2004 09:02 AM                     IMHO, Superbit DVDs are nothing more than a marketing gimmick by Columbia. They are regular formatted DVD's. It's just that they are using the upper limits of the data bit rate that the regular consumer DVD format allows. Many other DVD's may in fact use approximately the same rate that Columbia is using without attaching the "superbit" label. A consumer DVD recorder set at the "XP" mode is in fact using the highest data rate possible (10mbps) for the consumer version of DVD.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-13-2004 09:38 AM                     The only way one might see a difference is if you are using a progressive scan capable TV or if you happen to have an upconverter that outputs all standard video as 1080i. LG makes a neato HDTV receiver that also has a DVD player built in. The DVD comming out of the LG is upconverted to 1080i and DVD's needless to say will look really nice. Samsung also has a DVD player with a Farodja processor built in and that player also looks incredible but the Farodja is only active via the DVI digital out connector. Mark  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 06-13-2004 12:23 PM                     Sony Superbit titles typically have to be judged on a title by title basis, but overall, like Paul mentioned, it is mainly a marketing gimmick. Lots of DVDs from other studios do the same thing as Superbit (and more) when they put the movie alone on one disc and then locate the extras on another. The main thing you're gaining with a Superbit title is a DTS audio track and a more detailed video image. The level of detail improvement varies from title to title. It's tough to see those improvements on a standard 4:3 NTSC TV set. "Air Force One" Superbit is a noticeable improvement over the older release. And the Superbit version "Lawrence of Arabia" fixed several problems visible in the previous Columbia 2-disc release.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Garman Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: Toledo, OH USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 06-13-2004 01:32 PM                     I agree it's really a title by title call on whether they are better. Lawrence of Arabia is the only title that'd I'd say get for sure because of reworked transfer and audio by Robert Harris. Also, if you're a DTS fiend like me, they are cool too. I know on xXx the DTS track did make a big difference, but it still did lack the oomph of the theatrical DTS and SRD I remember hearing. AJG  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-13-2004 11:44 PM                     "but it still did lack the oomph of the theatrical DTS and SRD I remember hearing." I never considered the L.O.A. tracks to contain any oomph at all.... mostly highs, no lows... they are actually somewhat lame as far as audio tracks of the time. It always sounded pretty flat to me, but the dialog was very good. I doubt that RAH inserted oomph where there was none. Mark  |  IP: Logged William Hooper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1879 From: Mobile, AL USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-14-2004 01:26 AM                        I have found in my experience more breakage with superbit DVD's than regular carbide bits in drill press applications.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Garman Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: Toledo, OH USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 06-14-2004 03:44 AM                     quote: Mark Gulbrandsen I never considered the L.O.A. tracks to contain any oomph at all.... mostly highs, no lows... they are actually somewhat lame as far as audio tracks of the time. It always sounded pretty flat to me, but the dialog was very good. I doubt that RAH inserted oomph where there was none. I think you misread me Mark. I was talking about the track on xXx. The track on Lawrence was beautiful and I would never ask for anything more, especially with Mr. Harris' approval on it. AJG  |  IP: Logged Michael Coate Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1904 From: Los Angeles, California Registered: Feb 2001 posted 06-14-2004 01:02 PM                     quote: Aaron Garman I think you misread me Mark. I was talking about the track on xXx. Perhaps if you would have stylized or "set off" the title in your sentence you would not have been misunderstood. I'd suggest using quotations or italics when referring to titles in a sentence. Easier to read... makes the writer look good.... Just a bit of friendly advice for "effective communication"-challenged folks.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Garman Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: Toledo, OH USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 06-16-2004 01:13 PM                     Good point. Myself, being a speech communication major, should have thought of something like that! AJG  |  IP: Logged John Lasher Master Film Handler Posts: 493 From: Newark, DE Registered: Aug 2001 posted 06-18-2004 07:54 PM                        "Tommy" is a pretty good one. The original DVD was the first that we rented. I purchased (special-ordered, actually) the SuperBit edition relatively recently. I'll compare them.. Video: Original: Excellent picture quality, especially considering the age of the film. Some artifacting to be seen, but not really that distracting. SuperBit: Even better. No artifacting (that I noticed), more detail (in one scene I could see Ann-Margret's panties through the outfit she had on). In some places it bordered on looking like a recently-shot film. Audio: Original: English audio in the original Quintaphonic (5.0) and 2.0 Surround. On my (stereo) system, the only audible difference between the 5.0 and the 2.0 was what I can only describe as an unpleasent "loudness" in the 2.0 version. The bassists on this film might as well have stayed home, I actually checked the speaker switch on my receiver to make sure the subwoofer was on. SuperBit: English Dolby & DTS 5.1 Surround. Now I can hear the bass, and while it doesn't exactly give the subwoofer a workout, it doesn't leave me questioning wether or not I should have it serviced. The original edition featured performer and filmmaker biographies and a printed essay about the restoration of the soundtrack (which is available online if you know what to type in Google). The SuperBit edition features... well, nothing really, unless you count the little catalog of the other SuperBit releases available. Minor note(in case I've convinced you to buy this one): The disc defaults to DTS, you have to go to the audio set-up menu and select Dolby if you're watching on a non-digital system (like me).  |  IP: Logged William Leland III Master Film Handler Posts: 336 From: Charleston, SC, Registered: Aug 2002 posted 06-19-2004 07:59 PM                        thanks for the opinions on superbit. i have an apex dvd player, very cheap. i plan on buying a 5 dvd changer optical outputs, and a 36" flat hdtv and wanted to hear about these dvd's. i no longer have internet acces and have stopped working at the Charleston IMAX, well only on the weekends. i have a new job, so sorry about the delay to reply, thanks again.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Haney Master Film Handler Posts: 265 From: Cupertino, CA, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 06-20-2004 10:16 PM                     I like the Superbit branding. It's all about consistency. Yes, their explainations and diagrams of how it works (dedicating as much of the bit budget as possible to the actual video and audio instead of extras) can inspire a bit of a "no shit, Sherlock" response, but I have found it to be the most reliable mark of quality out there. Many studios have developed branding for their "high end" releases. New Line has their "Platinum" series, Fox has their "Five Star" series, and so on. And of course, there is also the non-studio specific THX branding. I have found none of these logos give me a clear expectation of the quality I will find on the disc once I actually start to play it. It's always been hit and miss. Except for Superbit. It is the only branding I've seen that actually makes me feel like I know what I'm getting. Columbia/TriStar has earned this reputation with me by doing such a good job at putting out a consistent level of quality. If it's a gimmick, it's a good one.  |  IP: Logged Liam Utley Film Handler Posts: 42 From: Australia Registered: Oct 2003 posted 07-20-2004 05:11 AM                    I have "Bram Stokers Dracula" on superbit, and although the sound is great, the transfer is still lacking for a movie that really isnt THAT old. I can't compare it to the original dvd release, but in my opinion they are not worth the extra money.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.