Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Emulsion-on-sound-drum projectors (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Emulsion-on-sound-drum projectors
Simon Wyss
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Basel, BS, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 12-17-2019 02:16 AM      Profile for Simon Wyss   Email Simon Wyss   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi, friends, I’d like to know more about 35mm projectors that have the sound head so oriented that prints wrap around the drum with the photographic layer next to it. That way constant focus is secured. In Europe there seems to be the Philips FP 20 alone. Among the American makes I know of DeVry. Are there any more brands?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-17-2019 07:19 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I last used one in 1998, so my memory may be failing me, but I have a dim recollection that the optical reader on the Gaumont-Kalee GK-37 is so arranged. If so, the unusual sound drum arrangement is likely because it was a Frankenprojector, cobbled together from the ashes of Rank's VistaVision adventure.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 12-17-2019 11:30 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An easier question would be what American projectors do not have the film's emulsion wound against the sound drum. As far as I know, none.

All the major brands such as Simplex, Century were designed this way. This has never been a problem unless something is wrong with the projector's sound head, such as bad bearings or an off balance flywheel.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-17-2019 12:36 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don’t think the 5-Star sound head works with the emulsion against the drum.

The film wraps counter clockwise around the drum. If the film is threaded with the emulsion side facing the rear of the projector, that puts the base side against the drum.

That stupid pinch roller is another kettle of fish.

In fact I don’t remember any projector that I worked on to place the emulsion against the drum. Century. Simplex. Christie. I don’t even remember the Kinoton to be that way.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-17-2019 09:21 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Kinoton FP20/FP30 optical sound head is that way (original one). It also is susceptible to picking up the work light because the cell is "looking" forward.

An advantage to the emulsion facing the drum is that focus isn't dependent on film thickness. The same was true of film gates. Straight gates let the emulsion side be the reference...curved gates, typically had the base side. Cinemeccanica sort of did a curved gate with the emulsion side as the reference.

 |  IP: Logged

Simon Wyss
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Basel, BS, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 12-18-2019 01:03 AM      Profile for Simon Wyss   Email Simon Wyss   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, gentlemen, for the commitment. Since we’re at it, the Philips-Kinoton FP 20/23/30 have a curved gate, the convex part of it movable and the concave one rigid.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-18-2019 06:24 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is true...however, the runner strips on Kinoton are a wearable part that get thinner with use. So you do have focus drift over time as well as the aperture to film spacing changing as well. On the up side, as the skate and runners wear, they tend to get better with time...until the point that they wear out.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-18-2019 03:33 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
A point of clarity, I can't think of any major projector that has the emulsion against the sound drum. Absolutely Century, Simplex, Christie, etc does not. The base side is what is in contact with the sound drum.

Now Simplex and RCA soundheads do have that dreadful pinch roller that is marvelous at adding wear to the emulsion of the image, but the base side of the film is what is against the sound drum itself.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-18-2019 07:36 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is the DeVry, but with a red reader I retrofitted in. Normally the Exciter lamp is to the right and the photo tube or cell went inside the sound drum.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Emiel De Jong
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: Geldrop The Netherlands
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-19-2019 04:07 AM      Profile for Emiel De Jong   Email Emiel De Jong   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The older type FP20 / FP30 soundheads have emulsion side in contact with the drum, however image and sound area is not touched. The newer (reverse scan) soundheads are base side in contact with the drum.

 |  IP: Logged

Simon Wyss
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Basel, BS, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 12-20-2019 02:14 AM      Profile for Simon Wyss   Email Simon Wyss   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Emiel De Jong
The older type FP20 / FP30 soundheads have emulsion side in contact with the drum
That’s the reason for my asking, somebody on a German forum said it were the only such projector known to him. I thought to myself, not possible, someone must have had the idea before, I mean the FP 20 is from 1957-58 but optical sound is at least thirty years older.

Emulsion-on-drum sound projectors are well known with 16mm film, Bell & Howell had it, Bauer, Siemens & Halske, Paillard-Bolex, RCA. Not Ampro, not Kodak, not Hortson

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-20-2019 07:23 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
16mm is a different animal. Unlike 35mm MOST 16mm prints had the emulsion facing the lens. It all depends on where your print was in the dupe-chain (how far away from the negative it was). Kinoton even had a lever on their FP16/FP18 and portables built off those mechanisms for changing the focus between standard/non-standard to compensate for emulsion in/out.

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-20-2019 07:32 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When servicing 16mm in the day, we had an SMPTE focus loop with half of the loop in each emulsion position and did a compromise focus balancing both positions. The oscilloscope was our best friend for this task.

Basic service on RCA, Bell & Howell, Ampro and Eiki projectors.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-20-2019 07:38 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The printing and projection orientation of 16mm never had a global standard stick in the way that it did with 35. This is likely because it started as exclusively a reversal process (i.e. it was invented for home movies), and then negative-positive workflows in 16mm came later. The fact that 16mm was originally double perf, and then a single perf variant came along with sound could also have been part of that mix. So Kodak originally started with the base facing the lens (for projection), and later processes had the emulsion facing the lens.

In the UK, at least, the latter were known as "DIN prints," (Deutsches Institut für Normung, a German technical standards organization that presumably defined a standard for 16mm release printing) and a BTH 16mm portable I once remember using actually had the optical photocell adjustment lever for flipping positions labeled "Standard" at one end and "DIN" at the other.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 12-20-2019 07:59 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
a BTH 16mm portable I once remember using actually had the optical photocell adjustment lever
The Kodak Pageant projectors had a small lever for focusing the sound head optics
depending on the orientation of the sound track. (or more correctly, the emulsion position)

In the earlier(1950's) models, I believe it was actually labeled "FOCUS", but in later models
it was labeled "FIDELITY"

The levers were labeled "R" and "P" for "Reversal" and "Print" by a large university I worked
at many years ago, since the student films could be one way or the other depending on how
they were made, such as if they contained opticals, etc .

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.