my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Silver screen paint for 3D -- Source?

Author Topic: Silver screen paint for 3D -- Source? Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-19-2019 08:08 AM                        I know in the 80s when they brought back single strip 3D, theatres used to spray their regular screens with a silver paint -- a down and dirty fix just so they could cash in on a 3D run. Was there a paint that was specifically formulated for this? Would theatre supply outfits carry this stuff or would any paint with high silver content work? Anyone know of a specific brand that can be used to retain polarization?  |  IP: Logged Alan Gouger Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 501 From: Bradenton, FL, USA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 02-19-2019 10:26 AM                        Paintonscreen I tried this years ago when I built a DIY silver screen. This stuff really works. They make a silver option that maintains polarisation.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-19-2019 10:26 AM                     Technikote sold it (defunct) in the '80s. It didn't do very well, in my opinion. I'm sure screen paint is available since IMAX, last I checked, sprays their screens in the field as part of their installation.  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 02-19-2019 04:00 PM                     Most metallic paints will work to some extend and will retain most of the polarization. Most modern "silver screens" actually use a form of aluminum flakes as their "silver coat", not real silver, which would make the screens not only ultra expensive, but also far heavier.  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 02-19-2019 05:58 PM                     The paint is not hard to find, pretty much any aluminum paint will work. Getting it on smoothly/evenly is a big problem.  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 02-20-2019 09:41 AM                        I hope your not considering doing this Frank! There are options out there for 3D screens that are not AS bad as traditional "silver" screen. I have used the Harkness Clarus to pretty good results. In my opinion it does still have a hot spot and stilll looks directional to me but it is much less so than a comparable 3D screen. I would actually take a regular high gain screen over paint any day as I would think its near impossible to get it coated perfectly. Also what do you do about the perfs?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-20-2019 02:56 PM                     Can't tell you how many old screens I switched out that had been painted silver in years past. Probably for the 3-D days in the 70's, but I can't imagine that it ever worked out very well. In fact that whole 1970's 3-D thing was kind of a bust. All screen manufacturers keep their paint coatings as closely guarded secrets... Mark  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-20-2019 05:05 PM                        Thanks, guys. This is not a theatre -- it's a down-and-dirty room students want to use to screen their video projects on a wall (no perfs, Sean). Basically it'll be use for what would be the video equivalent of "rushes" or "dailies." Since they have already made the decision to paint the plaster wall as their screen, when someone asked if they could do passive 3D on it, I thought, possibly, but of course they'll need a silver paint instead of white. As for evenness, that will be the biggest challenge for sure. On the other hand, they are students and whether it works or hails and they need to buy a real silver screen, it will be a learning experience for them.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 02-20-2019 05:10 PM                     Don't know which constraints they have to follow equipment wise - but in general, shutter glasses are easier to do than passive. Passive 3D is the better solution if you need cheap glasses for many users (as in cinema). For a small number of users, shutter glasses is the cheaper and easier way. IMAX used a huge automated rig to paint some of their silver screens on site. This probably got it close to what screen manufacturers can achieve on their lots. IMAX may even have bought that rig from one of the major screen manufacturers. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.