Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » OK to run non-striped film over mag head? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: OK to run non-striped film over mag head?
Gary A. Hoselton
Film Handler

Posts: 59
From: Portland OR U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2005


 - posted 08-04-2018 06:01 PM      Profile for Gary A. Hoselton   Email Gary A. Hoselton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have Siimplex 4-track mag readers atop my XL's. What is effect of running non-stripped film over the heads? Has to do with making up shorts on a reel, where some footage is sound-stripped and other footage not. What were the rules and practice?

 |  IP: Logged

Stephan Shelley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 854
From: castro valley, CA, usa
Registered: Nov 2014


 - posted 08-04-2018 06:08 PM      Profile for Stephan Shelley   Email Stephan Shelley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
excessive ware on the hard to replace mag heads. Your going to scratch the outboard half of the optical soundtrack. 4 track mag covers half of this with a mag strip for center channel.

 |  IP: Logged

Phillip Grace
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 164
From: ACMI. Melbourne. Australia.
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 08-05-2018 01:40 AM      Profile for Phillip Grace   Email Phillip Grace   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The convention when inserting junk film as spacing into sound component reels for rerecording was to splice it in so that the base surface, not the emulsion, ran across the magnetic heads. This would have been done to protect the heads, rather than the film. For 35mm film the optical and magnetic sound tracks are on opposite sides of the film base. A small degree of scratching to the base side of the optical track should make little or no difference to the sound reproduction on either front or rear-scanning soundheads. Variations in the emulsion geometry on 16mm film would require further consideration. That being said, I would expect that magnetic heads in good condition would not damage the film anyway.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-06-2018 07:01 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why would you thread around the heads? Normally if the penthouse is situated properly on top of the XLs, you should be able to threat directly thru the penthouse and bypass the heads entirely. And yes, if you must threat around the heads, protect them from direct contact, but even with a wrap of film, you will be adding unnecessary friction against the film emulsion.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary A. Hoselton
Film Handler

Posts: 59
From: Portland OR U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2005


 - posted 08-06-2018 08:11 PM      Profile for Gary A. Hoselton   Email Gary A. Hoselton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Frank, my query has to do with combining some soundstriped film with non-striped film on same reel, such as
1) optical-only cartoon, then 4-track short, then optical-only preview, or
2) Mono optical reel with 4-track entrance, entre acte, or exit music spliced on. Or,
3) four-track reel with entrance, entre acte, or exit music only available in optical mono. Etc.
If safe to mix mag and non-mag on one reel, would save a changeover or two for fairly short run times. But, "Do No Harm" is the prevailing admonition, so am I safe combining or not?

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 08-06-2018 09:07 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gary, short and direct answer is NO, it is not good to mix mag and optical on the same reel.

I disagree strongly with Phillip on the idea that "A small degree of scratching to the base side of the optical track should make little or no difference to the sound reproduction on either front or rear-scanning soundheads."

ANY scratching on an optical track, base side or emulsion side, WILL introduce audible degradation to the track. (How audible is subject to which side of the film and how severe the scratching is of course.)

I firmly believe that you should always take the utmost care of ANY film, whether in your personal collection or especially if it does not belong to you.

When I worked the University some years ago, I would even do changeovers for just the Dolby SR/Dolby digital snipes as I was often dealing with archival or privately owned prints. It does not take that much more effort to do the changeovers, especially if you are only dealing with a few shorts.

If you are doing a program of several minutes (>20mins.) or a few HOURS of shorts, then try to program them so that all of the compatible tracks are on individual reels for the changeovers. I have found that, with rare exception, most filmmakers (or as at UCI, professors) will adjust the program order willingly to preserve the film itself and improve the potential quality of the presentation.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-06-2018 10:12 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to underline what others have written above, I was taught never, ever, to run unstriped film over a mag head (because the raw film base will cause abrasion damage to the surface of the heads), or striped film through an optical head (because the pad roller that guides the film over the optical scanning drum may apply enough force to damage the oxide).

I can't ever remember being in a situation in which I was asked to run striped and unstriped film spliced together in the same reel. If I ever had been, I'd have explained the situation diplomatically to the film's owner, and asked for his or her permission to unpick it and resplice it into a striped and an unstriped reel, if only temporarily for that show. If they had refused, it would have been up to the house manager as to whether or not (s)he was willing to risk damage to the equipment running it as is.

The nearest I've come is having to run acetate and polyester spliced together in the same reel, and having to ride the gate tension on the fly in between individual clips.

 |  IP: Logged

Phillip Grace
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 164
From: ACMI. Melbourne. Australia.
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 08-08-2018 03:17 AM      Profile for Phillip Grace   Email Phillip Grace   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, that's me told! [Smile] [Smile]

I assumed a single projector was all that was available. Given a dual projector change-over system there is no reason to take the risk - thread appropriately to the film to be screened and change back and forth as required. Maybe make up more or less synchronized rolls if the times involved between changes are too short to re-thread the incoming machine.
I'm curious though, as to why raw film base would be more abrasive than applied magnetic stripe material.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-08-2018 07:16 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Running the base side of unstriped film over mag heads is done all the time in postproduction, where junk picture film is used as leader and "sound fill" in rolls of mag-stripe film. This should cause no more damage to the heads (and possibly less) than running mag film across them. Running emulsion-side against mag heads is bad, though.

Unless the mag heads in dubbers are significantly different from the mag heads in projectors, this shouldn't be a problem. I have seen mixed rolls of 70mm mag and 70mm DTS run together with no obvious problems, as the 70mm mag head only touches unprojected film area.

As mentioned above, this may be a problem with 35mm, since the mag stripe is located over part of where the optical track would normally live.

Also, with 35mm, there is the issue of mixing CS perfs and KS perfs in the same roll. This might actually work if the film is cement-spliced together, but I'm not sure that I would want to try it, personally.

Edit: Aside from this thread, I have never seen or heard anything about not running mag film through an optical head. And I'm not really sure how one could avoid doing that with 35mm on any projector other than a Norelco. Why would this be a problem, assuming that all of the metal parts have been demagnetized?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 08-08-2018 03:56 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just make up separate reels - to be safe.

New mag heads are unobtanium.

When I ran a booth with full Simplex DeLuxe Stereo XL setup, our preview reel was separate from the mag stock and we would never splice optical on a mag roll for the same purpose of limiting wear on the mag heads.

quote: Scott Norwood
Also, with 35mm, there is the issue of mixing CS perfs and KS perfs in the same roll. This might actually work if the film is cement-spliced together, but I'm not sure that I would want to try it, personally.


In the mag days, Griswold did have a mag slicer (grey frame instead of black) that had CS register pins instead of the larger KS pins where one could wet splice both stocks together.

CIRO also had a CS tape splicer to do the same. Frame was gold instead of aluminum.

If using a standard KS pin splicer, then one is going to have to file down the pins for the CS sprockets to do both stocks.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-08-2018 04:19 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
Also, with 35mm, there is the issue of mixing CS perfs and KS perfs in the same roll. This might actually work if the film is cement-spliced together, but I'm not sure that I would want to try it, personally.
+1. Added to which, any CS-perforated stock in circulation now is likely to be significantly shrunk. I would want to run a section of leader to check for perf damage before running a reel, even with sprocket teeth that are designed for use with CS perfs. That having been said, I was playing probably three or four CS prints a year on the Egyptian's Norelco AAIIs, and there was no problem with any of them.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary A. Hoselton
Film Handler

Posts: 59
From: Portland OR U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2005


 - posted 08-11-2018 12:42 PM      Profile for Gary A. Hoselton   Email Gary A. Hoselton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks fellows, you have given me a policy for my booth:

1. OK when needed to splice non-soundstriped CD leader and head and tail leaders to 3- and 4-track soundstriped 35mm film, oriented so that only base side contacts the heads.
2. Do not combine soundstriped and non-soundstriped program material on the same reel, but arrange them for changeovers.

Objective is to extend life of mag heads and avoid possible scratching by surround track head on base side of optical track of non-soundstriped film.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary A. Hoselton
Film Handler

Posts: 59
From: Portland OR U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2005


 - posted 08-11-2018 06:59 PM      Profile for Gary A. Hoselton   Email Gary A. Hoselton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I misidentified mag track laid over half the optical track, and time to edit has expired. Post should be:

Thanks fellows, you have given me a policy for my booth:

1. OK when needed to splice non-soundstriped CD leader and head and tail leaders to 3- and 4-track soundstriped 35mm film, oriented so that only base side contacts the heads.
2. Do not combine soundstriped and non-soundstriped program material on the same reel, but arrange them for changeovers.

Objective is to extend life of mag heads and avoid possible scratching on base side of non-soundstriped film by track 2 center speaker head which rides on the stripe that covers half of the optical sound track.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-13-2018 06:16 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just ran a few reels of 2001 4trk and it played without any problems (original release print 1968, but it is Eastman, so in the non-IBTech universe, space is beet red. What a shame. Sound on the other hand is still awesome except for the "inaudible" 12KHz trigger every now and then. What duffus thought THAT was a good idea? 25Hz would have worked just as well and a lot less likely to be reproduced in those little surround speakers of the day. You can notch that 12KHz all you want but every time I am in the house I want to hold my hands up against my ears like the guys on the moon when they are inspecting the monolith. [Embarrassed]

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 08-13-2018 08:54 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Congrats on being able to hear 12 Khz at your age. LOL

The filters used to notch this were none too good mostly, and there is the issue of the projector not running on speed. So the 12Khz is off to one side of the notch filter.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.