Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » EK prints: 1.85 spherical or 2.35 anamorphic.

   
Author Topic: EK prints: 1.85 spherical or 2.35 anamorphic.
Ben Brahem
Film Handler

Posts: 3
From: los angeles, califoria, usa
Registered: Mar 2017


 - posted 06-23-2018 10:25 AM      Profile for Ben Brahem   Email Ben Brahem   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
EK prints in 1.85 spherical or 2.35 anamorphic scope prints

I know it's like comparing apples with orange, but which one looks the best to your eye?

Obviously anamorphic scope prints have finer grain and use a bigger projection area, but I am also told that the spherical projection lenses are sharper than scope projection lenses which therefore offsets the difference in resolution.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-23-2018 11:53 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is a matter of how the movie was shot. If you are running an "EK" print, it is off of camera original (except for opticals) so you don't get a choice in the matter.

Anamorphic projection lenses vary all over the place in quality. Better ones, like the ISCO Blue-Star, for instance can resolve 80 ln/mm over much of the image or essentially what the prime lens can resolve. As such, I don't have any reservations as to the image quality (projection) of anamorphic movies...but it is lens dependent.

Without a doubt, ISCO full size anamorphics are best. Blue-Star is at the top of the list, then Ultra-Star (5-element) followed by Ultra (4-element). The very last generation of Schneider full-size Anamorphics ("WA") are equivalent to the ISCO-Ultra but only the last generation...any before that are junk. In the compact anamorphics, the roles are reversed. The Schneider compact anamorphic is of similar quality to their full-sized one but more suited to shorter focal lengths. The ISCO integrated anamorphics are okay but nothing spectacular. They did make a Blue-Star compact anamorphic but I have never seen one in operation. The Red ones on the Ultra Star plus are the same anamorphic as the gold ones but with the Ultra Star Plus prime lens.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Wood
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 206
From: Oxfordshire, United kingdom
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 07-21-2018 02:06 PM      Profile for Jonathan Wood   Email Jonathan Wood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Out of interest , was the main adavantage of the intergrated anamorphics that they could be used with wide angle backing elements at short throws? I use an integrated Isco in my home set up because it will focus much closer than my Blue Star full size lens .

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.