Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » A new 65 mm camera made in Denmark

   
Author Topic: A new 65 mm camera made in Denmark
Helmut Maripuu
Film Handler

Posts: 25
From: Västerås Västmanland Sweden
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 05-21-2018 04:59 PM      Profile for Helmut Maripuu   Email Helmut Maripuu   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.biografmuseet.dk/nyheder/2018/magellan/index.htm
http://www.in70mm.com/news/2018/magellan/index.htm
http://www.in70mm.com/news/2018/logmar/gallery_2/index.htm

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-22-2018 05:53 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

The camera

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 05-23-2018 03:17 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "Magellan 65" will be presented at CineGear next week in LA

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-23-2018 12:24 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
But only a video viewfinder??????

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-23-2018 05:35 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Simplifies the optical path, I guess - straight shot from lens to emulsion. Presumably a video rangefinder is cheaper to do than an SLR type optical viewfinder.

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-23-2018 05:59 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The video finder allows other monitors to view the image while taking the shot. This can be helpful in the event that another angle may be desirable based upon what the director sees in this camera's view.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2018 11:38 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Presumably a video rangefinder is cheaper to do than an SLR type optical viewfinder.
Exactly! An optical shutter reflex viewing system is actually 2/3 of the cost of manufacturing most reflex film cameras. This rig would meke a great underwater camera, but I think many DP's would shy away from it because of the video finder only.Even reflex cameras have a straight optical path to the film plane, unless it is a pellicle reflex type.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2018 06:26 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
But only a video viewfinder??????
Ironic how you used a picture of Jerry Lewis, there.

He's the guy who invented 24-frame video assist:

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Lewis#Video_assist

During production of The Bellboy, Lewis pioneered the technique of using video cameras and multiple closed circuit monitors, which allowed him to review his performance instantly. This was necessary since he was acting as well as directing. His techniques and methods of video assist, documented in his book and his USC class, enabled him to complete most of his films on time and under budget since reshoots could take place immediately instead of waiting for the dailies. Lewis stated he worked with the head of Sony to develop the prototype. While he popularized the practice, and was instrumental in its development, he did not hold a patent. This practice is now commonplace in filmmaking.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 05-30-2018 08:01 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

Why is the trend in newer cameras that boxy, cheap CNC look? I miss the older cameras like the Mitchells that had style and looked like a solid piece of kit.

The new stuff all looks like a high school design project...

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2018 09:44 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Because they are made by CNC! Thats not to say that an old Mitchell NC or Standarad isn't also boxy...

 -

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 05-30-2018 10:19 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What possible difference does it make what the capture system looks like if it works well?

Just asking. Never mind. [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-31-2018 06:39 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since modern films are shot with accompanying sound. Reducing noise is more important than appearance. Blimping extra volume of camera can be cumbersome. Electronic view finders are also easier to blimp.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-31-2018 07:06 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is sort of interesting but do we really need more 65mm cameras? I would assume that supply must exceed demand, or else Panavision and Arriflex would be building more of their existing models. I would tend to doubt that the current lack of 65mm production is the result of limited camera inventory at rental houses.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.