my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Lens Help

Author Topic: Lens Help Steve McAndrew Film Handler Posts: 95 From: North Yorkshire, UK Registered: May 2015 posted 06-28-2017 03:14 PM                     I have two 50mm lenses, generally they look identical however one has a much smaller rear lens (facing the film) than the other. Why would this be? Thanks  |  IP: Logged Stephan Shelley Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 854 From: castro valley, CA, usa Registered: Nov 2014 posted 06-28-2017 07:53 PM                     Usually the ones with the larger rear element are for 70mm.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 06-28-2017 08:13 PM                       Stephan is right but in short lenses like 50mm, I doubt anyone made a 50mm lens to play 70mm film. Different brands and models have all sorts of differences including aperture size. I would stick with pairs that look identical if they are to be used on the same screen.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-28-2017 09:28 PM                     Where to begin here. Later lens designs like the ISCO Ultra-Star Plus (red barrel) or the Schneider Cinelux-Premiere are designed to capture more light by better matching the typical reflectors in use. These lens have a larger inlet pupil than prior designs. They have significantly more light throughput than prior deisgns despite having similar f-stops (the standard Ultra Star Plus is an f/2.1 but one can remove the standard ring for an f/1.7 or replace the ring for an f/2.4 or f/2.7. Even at f/2.4 they are brighter than prior designs. The Cinelux Premiere has a variable iris that also allows as fast as f/1.7 and can be stopped way down though anything much more than f/2.7 will result in a "black hole" of light in the middle. As to 70mm format lenses, sorry Sam, your memory is getting you on this one. Short EF lenses for 70mm go about as far back as Todd AO (ISCO's T-Kiptikon series went pretty short) and via their .56X magnifier (used in the T-Kiptikon line originally) can get you down into the 40s. However, with the 70mm surgance in late 80s, both ISCO and Schneider made an entire line of under 100mm EF lenses for 70mm film that would get you down to 50mm and due to 8/70 being a popular alternative to IMAX for a brief period while studios like Disney were supporting it, there were also a selection of lenses with short EFs that could handle 8/70 as well as 5/70 too.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 06-29-2017 01:04 AM                       Not a memory issue on this topic. One simply does not see these lenses out there in cinemas. Point out one example of a 70mm film based cinema running today other than the odd IMAX and I'll concede the point. I've only ever seen the lenses you refer to in a catalog, or a specialty situation. I have lenses as short as 45mm in int. scope lens but nothing that can play 70mm that short for sale or everyday use. Should not have stated they were never made. That was too attractive to prove wrong.  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 06-29-2017 04:27 AM                     On a total aside, I can't bear to see Isco & Schneider lenses thrown away. Not simply on what they cost when new but that they are superb examples of optical engineering. I've a fair few boxed in storage, one day I'll dream up some way of displaying them. Occasionally even now, a customer has a use for one, which is great! Most recently was 'Hateful 8' in Ultra Panavision 70mm. It just so happened that I had a pair of 70mm lenses in the focal length required by two venues who were running it over here.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-29-2017 05:07 AM                     Sam, I've used them for 5/70 presentations. Heck, the Uptown theatre in DC used 62mm EF lenses for 70mm film. I used shorter than 100mm EF lenses for 5/70 at the Colonial Williamsburg Visitor's Center "Patriot Theatres" too. And yes, in IMAX venues were we augmented them with 5/70 systems, we used VERY short lenses as well for 5/70 (I want to say it is a 42.7mm lens but would need to look it up to confirm). Thy were not ficticious lenses.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 06-29-2017 09:18 AM                       90mm is a long way from 50mm cited in the original message. Every example you cite is in the past. The chances of a random 50mm lens capable of 70mm playback showing up alongside a run of the mill 50 is mighty high and I was answering the question the most direct way I could. Your explanation of the difference in pupil size was excellent but somewhat common knowledge. The "speed" of the lens is just a calculation involving the size of the specific set of optics vs an actual measurement of the light that is passed. I found this out in my early days, many years ago.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-29-2017 09:32 AM                     The speed of the lens does not tell the whole story as the f-number is strictly based on exit diameter versus focal length. The Ultra-Star Plus was notably more light efficient than its predecessors and the Ultra-Star before it, even at f/2.4 was as bright or brighter than the f/2.0 Ultras that came before them. The Schneider 70mm lenses designated for 5/70 or 8/70 film (below 105mm) would not look out of the ordinary as compared to many equivalent lenses of similar focal lengths of the day. Furthermore, towards the end, Schneider would supply the 70mm format lens in lieu of a 35mm format lens if they were out of the 35mm format lens so it is very possible for a late-model theatre to end up with a 70mm format lens below 100mm. That said, checking things over, it would appear that once one got to 50mm EF, yes, the lens would be notably different since it would be made for 101.6mm lens mounts. At 60mm is where the transition seemed to occur from standard 70.6mm barrels to 101.6mm  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.