Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cinelab London Revives 65mm Negative Processor

   
Author Topic: Cinelab London Revives 65mm Negative Processor
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-28-2016 10:45 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There must be some big plans for shooting 65mm footage because setting up this processor in this day and age is no small feat.

 -

You should be able to see this link even if you don't have a Facebook account.

Kodak Facebook Page

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Ostertag
Film Handler

Posts: 41
From: St. Louis, MO, USA
Registered: Jun 2014


 - posted 10-28-2016 08:21 PM      Profile for Tom Ostertag   Email Tom Ostertag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Glorious!

Is that leader it's loaded with? Are the lack of perfs normal?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Brandenstein
Master Film Handler

Posts: 413
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Registered: Jul 2013


 - posted 10-28-2016 09:19 PM      Profile for Bill Brandenstein   Email Bill Brandenstein   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Processing lines always stay threaded with leader; when an actual run is in progress, it's fed in at a set speed after being attached to the end of the leader. Once the end of the run is reached, leader is attached and run until the whole processing line is depleted of film so that it stays threaded.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 10-29-2016 04:46 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Could that be for Dunkirk release prints, or is there a reason to assume this machine will only process negative?

What makes a negative processor a negative processor? Special film handling, lower speed?

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-29-2016 07:31 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My first guess would be chemistry, mostly. Timing & temperature would be my next guess.

Although a given set of chemistry can be used for many different types of film stock, the exact combinations of developer, stop, reversal agent, redeveloper, fixer, clearing agent and preservatives will be optimized for each type of film used. Temperatures and processing times for each stage of development will also vary.

Developing film isn't always a fixed process. There can be a lot of Kentucky Windage involved, especially if the photographer/director wants a particular look or effect in the final product.

I would say that setting a machine up to process a certain type of film then tearing it down, cleaning out all the chemical residue from the previous batches then setting it all up again and developing test strips before processing a new type of film is enough of a pain in the ass (not to mention cost) that it's better to set up separate machines for each film type.

Even when I develop single rolls of film at home, I like to batch process several rolls with the same process just to save time, trouble and chemicals.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-29-2016 12:14 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nolan is releasing another epic in 70mm/35mm/Imax 15/70 so maybe another processing facility is being funded by him or Imax? I don't know how many exist now?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-29-2016 01:12 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carsten Kurz
Could that be for Dunkirk release prints, or is there a reason to assume this machine will only process negative?
It's 65mm, so 70mm stock wouldn't physically fit in the flanges of the rollers. So it can only be used with 65mm camera and intermediate stocks.

As Randy mentions, the processing chemistry and sequence (of immersion times and temperatures) is different for different types of emulsion, though. For example, 2383 (release print stock) uses process ECP-2D. 5207 (Vision 3 camera negative stock) uses ECN-2. Processing machines can be reconfigured and adapted to change processes, but this is a significant and time-consuming operation.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-29-2016 02:58 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Changing processes within a machine is rarely if ever done because of cross contamination between different types of chemicals.

You are talking LOTS of chemical here, not just a few quarts, then all the lines, pumps and storage tanks.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted 10-30-2016 01:47 AM      Profile for Tyler Purcell   Author's Homepage   Email Tyler Purcell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I read somewhere there is another Lab in the UK (or central Europe) that can do 65mm negative and 70mm release prints. Kodak said prior to Dunkirk production started that they were processing "locally"... so I'm very confused about that.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 10-30-2016 02:46 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is that a brand new processor, or an old one that has been re-commissioned?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-30-2016 03:02 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tyler,

There used to be a really nice 65/70mm lab near Paris. But they also shut down about a year or two ago.

Also, I could not really tell if this processor was being recommissioned or if it was brand new. I;d just have to say that it "looks new".

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-30-2016 05:40 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd be surprised if it's all brand new, given how much surplus lab equipment must be floating around following the transition to digital. Completely recommissioned and refurbished, possibly using parts from multiple machines and some new ones, would seem to me to be more likely.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.