my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Reverse scan and slit loss

Author Topic: Reverse scan and slit loss Fabian Schreyer Film Handler Posts: 63 From: Aachen, Germany Registered: Feb 2009 posted 07-26-2016 06:32 PM                     I was wondering the other day if you need any slit-loss compensation when using a perfectly aligned reverse-scan soundhead. (For example Kinoton) As I imagine, due to the magnification the slit should be small enough that the cutoff frequency is never reached. At least not in the audible spectrum. Any thoughts on this?  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 07-27-2016 05:57 AM                     You are seeking the widest frequency response...then yes, even with the Kinoton RSSD, you can go a little wider with slit loss correction. The big trick is getting good test film and having a good enough preamp to make it worth your effort. Much of the Dolby test film has questionable HF response. I tended to use NTAV's NT-Pink test film...which was good. Older CAT69 (B&W) was good save for a couple of batches. But if you are really trying to get flat out to 16KHz and beyond, slit loss correction, even on reverse scan is the only way.  |  IP: Logged Fabian Schreyer Film Handler Posts: 63 From: Aachen, Germany Registered: Feb 2009 posted 07-27-2016 06:39 PM                     Thanks for your input! Seems like I have to test it out. I hope I will manage to find some NT audio test films some day. Until then I'll have to stick to my CAT69P. I have prints of different age, but none of them is B&W.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-27-2016 07:57 PM                       I agree with Steve and in particular about the less than stellar quality of the 69P. Thus, I tend not to use the slit loss with red readers unless I know the quality of the alignment film. If you do use the slit loss, you should apply the same amount of correction to both channels as in counting turns on the trim pot or slider. If in doubt go with the channel that requires less EQ and duplicate it on the other channel setting. Nothing much useful above 12 k in any case. I use my dwindling supply of B & W 69 for my tuneups.  |  IP: Logged Fabian Schreyer Film Handler Posts: 63 From: Aachen, Germany Registered: Feb 2009 posted 07-28-2016 05:21 PM                     quote: Sam D. Chavez Nothing much useful above 12 k in any case. Can you explain what you mean by this? Does it mean that the linear frequency response above 12k is not that important for good sound?  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-28-2016 06:22 PM                       HF above 10Khz did not make it onto the print from the negative or the recordist did not try too hard as what ends up there is noise and scratches along with the audio. Dolby SR helped make it tolerable to good but analog optical was only ever so good, esp. distortion which could run to 3% typically. Hardly pristine in any case.  |  IP: Logged Fabian Schreyer Film Handler Posts: 63 From: Aachen, Germany Registered: Feb 2009 posted 07-28-2016 07:40 PM                     So it is kind of "If you have some reliable pink-noise film, adjust the slc and you have perfect results. If not, just go without it and the result will still be fine"?  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-28-2016 08:32 PM                       That is my opinion for everyday use. You do need to make sure the slit loss controls are wound all the way down as there's no telling after all this time where they are set.  |  IP: Logged Fabian Schreyer Film Handler Posts: 63 From: Aachen, Germany Registered: Feb 2009 posted 07-29-2016 06:02 AM                     Thanks for your thoughts on this!  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-29-2016 07:11 PM                     I had to retrofit an entire theater when they decided to get rid of all the Jax Lites and convert all the projectors to reverse scan LEDs. My instructions were that slit loss correction wasn't "needed" but I was still supposed to use the frequency analyzer to check it anyway. The reason I was told was basically what Sam said. After years of being adjusted every which way, there's no telling what they were set at. Since you are already going to have your scope hooked up to do the work in the first place, it only takes two extra minutes to hook up the analyzer and check the HF setting. That control exists. Even though it ends up being set all the way at the minimum, 99% of the time, the prudent person should verify that all is working the way that it should be. Right? Only a dummy would pass it up when it takes such a short time to check it.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 07-29-2016 07:38 PM                        Actually there is quite a bit of energy above 12k. Whether or not anyone can hear it is another question. The smaller the cinema and the better it is the more you can tell. Big houses cannot get the hf energyery far back. Who has large cinemas anymore? Also check phase across the entire spectrum using pink noise. L-R on proper analyzer. Not turning up the hf? I would fire them.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 07-29-2016 07:38 PM                         |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-30-2016 01:42 PM                       My main point on this topic was the lack of reliable test film. That being the case, the best practice is first do no harm, so minimum slit loss is best.  |  IP: Logged Tom Ruff Film Handler Posts: 36 From: Burbank, CA, USA Registered: Mar 2011 posted 08-01-2016 02:32 AM                     I was sitting here at the studio reading this post and had a thought. We have a SR-D/DTS camera here and still shoot a lot of optical negatives. If there is a need for black track pink noise or level set tone, we could set up a discussion thread and see what everyone needs and maybe use up some of our short ends.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.