Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Simplex XL: why 2 vs 3 piece pressure pad in trap?

   
Author Topic: Simplex XL: why 2 vs 3 piece pressure pad in trap?
Gary A. Hoselton
Film Handler

Posts: 59
From: Portland OR U.S.A.
Registered: Nov 2005


 - posted 11-11-2015 06:56 PM      Profile for Gary A. Hoselton   Email Gary A. Hoselton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have two Simplex XL's in changeover setup. The film trap door (gate) in one has 2-piece pressure pad (the rails which press the film against the trap and aperture), the other has 3-piece. Why the difference, and is one preferable?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-11-2015 07:05 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
The 2 piece was a prototype thing. (At least that's how it was explained to me.) They are VERY hard on splices and just generally suck. The 3 piece is much more gentle on the film. I have never seen a performance difference on screen between the two.

 |  IP: Logged

John Eickhof
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 588
From: Wendell, ID USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-11-2015 08:59 PM      Profile for John Eickhof   Author's Homepage   Email John Eickhof   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The two shoe straight gate was not a prototype, it was the original factory gate that the XL was originally designed with. It had a solid long pad and a small top pad and was the stock type sold that way throughout the run of the XL into the 1980's. (the curved gate was not introduced until the late 1960s) The three shoe trap was known and specified as the 'studio trap' as they were designed by Howard Straight in the early sixties for studio use by using the Simplex E7 style pads.(later a factory option when buying a new projector) Howard also did a mod to the trap by installing a screw stop to pre-adjust tension on the trap door as the stock straight gates were notorious for having excessive tension on film. (similar to the primary tension adjustment setscrew provided on the curved gate) Heads with the mod were quiet and smooth and were comparable to the E7 for picture quality. In fact, most studios preferred the E7 long into the late 60's. Howard also made the first Simplex 35/70s and the rock and roll (reversing) studio XLs in his shop. (Straight Industries, Los Angeles) He was a factory consultant for decades to Simplex and Strong. I knew him for several decades and am proud that he willed his home machine shop equipment to me when he passed years ago. I miss the wealth of information that he was regarding first quality projection. And, Gary, if your XLs were ever rebuilt or worked on by the late Dick Prather of Portland, they probably have the tension mod already done, and both will probably exhibit a high quality image. Dick was very meticulous about film tension and picture quality. Only for sake of standardized parts spares, would I suggest you go with the two shoe type. Only the trap door is different so you could pick up another one of the type you prefer. Personally, I have found the two piece with the tension mod is less noisy and handles worn film better than the three piece. I tend to stay away from the curved gate as they are definitely louder and unsteady when running curled or edge damaged prints as well as unlubricated film. If you need parts for either type,let me know.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 11-12-2015 01:50 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And I'll add:

I made a post here long ago on F-T in which I called the "perfect threading" technique.

Perfect Threading

Works great with the flat trap XL units and other makes..which does make the operation extremely quiet.

Goo Luck ! - Monte

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.