Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Changing oil in first generation Devry (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Changing oil in first generation Devry
Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 10-03-2015 03:22 PM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've got an old beat up Devry 35mm projector with a SN of 150 (not sure what model it is) and I'm trying to figure out how to properly change the oil of its intermittent.

I have been able to take it apart slightly and let some oil drain but I really don't think that's a good idea.

Here's what it looks like

 -

I circled where the oil cap is but the only way to get oil out of it is to take the whole thing apart and shake it upside down and even that doesn't get the oil out of there.

Also, it's impossible to see how much oil is in there because there's no oil window.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Koch
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: Williams Ca USA
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 10-05-2015 10:21 PM      Profile for Robert Koch   Email Robert Koch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You have shown the wrong side of this insult to engineering. Most of these had a cheaply made imitation of a Simplex movement. You should take the lower screw out of the movement on the film side and let it drain overnite this, providing some moron hasnt filled it with sae 90 or something like cup grease
My advice to you, find the nearest body of water close to your residence and throw this damn thing in it..

g

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 10-05-2015 10:33 PM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Robert, I only got this projector to mess with. I have a newer Devry modified by Kodak for dailies and a Wenzel. Both of those use Simplex intermittents.

I was able to take the bottom party off from the screws down there but since so little came out I'll try and leave it open overnight like you said. Thanks

Here's the operators side:
 -

The outer casting looks like cheese or plaster wall [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 10-06-2015 08:46 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I never did figure out how the DeVrys knew I was running a loop so it could quickly shred them while running an actual reel was okay.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-07-2015 03:15 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert Koch
You have shown the wrong side of this insult to engineering.
Compared to a Monee or a Spectra, it's a paragon of industrial archeology.

quote: Robert Koch
My advice to you, find the nearest body of water close to your residence and throw this damn thing in it..
Given the drought in the Inland Empire, that would probably mean a trip to Santa Monica. And the chassis is probably made of such thin and cheap steel that the chances are that it would float.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-10-2015 04:23 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dailies? No one runs filum dailies any more... I guess that's why you have it then.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Koch
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: Williams Ca USA
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 10-11-2015 10:23 PM      Profile for Robert Koch   Email Robert Koch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve Krause:
Ive been there; why do you think I have the hatred of these damn things. The navy cost the taxpayer, during the war, a bundle, thanks to a clandestine meeting between a navy purchasing agent and some Devry sob who paid this navy bastard plenty.

sob

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 10-12-2015 01:14 AM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, Kodak modified them in the late 50s and early 60s I think. It features a magnetic interlock as well as optical sound. It also has a xenon color filter for the tungsten lamp. all of it is on a cart type base that you can easily cart around. The whole thing weighs about 250 pounds.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 10-12-2015 03:02 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thought the Ballantyne PRO 35 was the desired candidate to anchor a boat down to keep it from drifting away... and their INT assemblies were the absolute pits to work on!

I trust that Jacob had never had the privilege to operate and maintain such a device.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Bolkovac
Film Handler

Posts: 27
From: Monroeville, Pa. USA
Registered: Mar 2011


 - posted 10-12-2015 08:42 AM      Profile for Frank Bolkovac   Email Frank Bolkovac   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Could of been a Christie that he has....

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-12-2015 12:39 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And who knows what lube to put in that movement? If it's a hardened star and cam running in cast iron bushings then a light projector oil. I

If they are soft steel star and cam like Brenkert then things may need to be very different from the norm so you don't ruin the internal parts. Motiograph for instance used grease in their movements.

I will take a Christie any day over most projectors! If they are maintained properly they actually need very, very little maintenance.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 10-12-2015 01:21 PM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought Ballantyne PRO 35s were used at Disney? All of their other film equipment like their loop boxes (whatever they were called) were custom made for attractions I think.

The oil that came out of it was watery and very dirty so I was just going to put Simplex oil or 10w non detergent compressor/hydraulic in it, but who knows if what was in there was correct.

I almost got a PRO 35 a couple years ago but thanks to this forum I found out they were no good [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 10-12-2015 04:22 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had one of those DeVry's many years ago.

It was noisy, the image a bit unsteady and not that gentle on film.

I never considered the projector itself to be a 'boat anchor' (and I had
actually had a boat back then) but I definitely would use that term to
describe the DeVry amplifer!

It was built like a tank- - with a couple of huge, heavy power and output
transformers, plus some big heavy iron inductors. Vacuum tubes, of course.
( 5U4, 6L6's and a couple of others.) But mostly, I remember it was very
HEAVY and it put out enough BTU's to heat a small room.

I recently came across some patent documents which showed a Bell Labs
patent application from 1928 for a 35mm "portable talking picture projector",
and from the drawings, it looked remarkably like a clone of the DeVry.

(Or maybe DeVry cloned theirs form Bell's)

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Delaney
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
Registered: Dec 2014


 - posted 10-12-2015 05:37 PM      Profile for Jacob Delaney   Email Jacob Delaney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is this the same one you're talking about?
"Model 389 power amplifier 75 watts"
 -

The other half is a controller for sound, treble, bass, and mag/optical/mike.

It worked a little bit when I first got it but it just slowly faded away until no sound came out of it. I noticed a resistor was fried and some of the capacitor's labels fell off so I couldn't fix it and replaced it with a CP-55 and a spare QSC 1400.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 10-12-2015 06:39 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen

I will take a Christie any day over most projectors! If they are maintained properly they actually need very, very little maintenance.

Mark, sounds like an oxymoron here. If maintained properly....

Besides this is Christie film projector. Really?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.