Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » so apparently 35mm isn't officially dead - yet.

   
Author Topic: so apparently 35mm isn't officially dead - yet.
Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 02-06-2015 01:33 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
from Wall Street Journal (Feb. 4, 2015)

Kodak Reaches Deals With Studios to Keep Film Business Alive

"Kodak is staying in the movie business.

More than half a year after the venerable film giant, attempting a turnaround out of bankruptcy, began seeking a way to avoid shutting down its motion-picture film business, it has deals with Hollywood’s six major studios.

Twentieth Century Fox, Paramount Pictures, SonyPictures, Universal Pictures, Walt Disney Pictures and Warner Bros. have all agreed to make advance purchases of film over the next few years, based on estimates of how much they’ll need, in sufficient quantity to allow Eastman Kodak Co. to keep its film plant in operation, Chief Executive Jeff Clarke said in an interview.

Mr. Clarke began negotiations with studios last summer to seek their help in keeping his company, the last to still make motion picture film, in the business, as The Wall Street Journal reported at the time. Due to the transition to digital technology, Kodak’s motion picture film sales plummeted 96% between 2006 and 2014, making the business unsustainable.

Prominent directors including Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino and J.J. Abrams who are among the minority still shooting on film played a key role lobbying studio chiefs.

“We were very close to the difficult decision of having to stop manufacturing film,” Mr. Clarke said. “Now with the cooperation of major studios and filmmakers, we’ll be able to keep it going.”

Although the use of film prints in theaters continues to decline, Mr. Clarke said studios’ commitments to keep using “negative film” to shoot certain movies is enough, along with other initiatives at the studio, to keep the business going.

Mr. Clarke said he expects the business to break even next year and potentially return to growth in future years. Kodak also still sells film to industrial customers and is developing a business that uses a version of its motion picture film in touch screen phones and tablets."

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-06-2015 03:30 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bring Out Your Dead
[evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-06-2015 03:39 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would like to see a picture of how they are going to use film in smartphones and tablets.

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 02-06-2015 04:32 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ninety. Six. Percent.

That is insane.

This is great news though!

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 02-06-2015 04:40 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Buck Wilson
Ninety. Six. Percent.
Geez! That IS an incredible drop!

If any other company (Radio Shack, for example) had a 96% drop in sales,
they'd have to declare bankruptcy.

- - - - oh, . . . . .wait a minute. . . [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 02-06-2015 05:56 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kodak has been a household name for longer than a Century. More than likely almost every home that ever had Photos,Slides 8mm/16mm films used Kodak in one way or another. Even though they had the opportunity to probably be on top in the Digital age going back to the 70's they dropped the ball; maybe even fearing then what eventually happen to the print film industry. I certainly would like to keep seeing and hearing their name in the Industry. they are an American Institution...

Sounds like most of the Studio's Purchases will be Negative Film Stock. Probably won't see a big flood of Release Positive Stock though. Just as long as their staying afloat will make me happy [thumbsup] [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-06-2015 07:46 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is this the same deal we hailed before?

They really do need to keep archiving on film. Nothing else is as certain. And for that matter there might be opportunities for data archiving as well. When you're talking about longevity over a century it has to be film.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-06-2015 08:19 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If this is camera negative stock that they're going to carry on with (which has to be acetate, because the mechanisms of several widely-used cameras cannot use polyester), I wonder if Kodak will continue to supply both acetate and polyester base film. The latter is crucial for archiving (for obvious reasons).

I also wonder what is going to happening in terms of processing. Will the volume of stock that Kodak will be sending out into the marketplace be enough to keep the existing labs viable? Will Kodak eventually be processing their own stock, because no-one else will be in business doing so?

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 02-06-2015 08:20 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is Steve, but now it's official. They had only gotten one or two destribs to agree the last time this came up.

Glad they got saved. They'd be more worthy of a govt bail out than the banks in an alternate situation!

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 02-15-2015 09:15 PM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very glad to read this. [beer]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.