my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » "Hot" Photocell !

Author Topic: "Hot" Photocell ! Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 05-11-2014 04:16 PM                     This ancient W-E photocell was in a box of vacuum tubes I acquired from an old theater several months ago. It still "works" if I connect 90vdc & an ammeter! I knew from its' general type & design that it was from the early 1930's. . . I was right (of course!) since I was able to find an article about the "new" type 3A photocell in a 1931 projection magazine. In the article, it stated that the cylindrical electrode was coated with a caesium oxide compound. I knew that caesium-oxide is a bit radioactive, so, out of curiousity, I pulled out my giegercounterthingy & was able to get a reading. This thing is moderately "hot" when you consider that the normal background radiation count here in my apartment is approximately 16-18CPM. (actually, I was able to get a small reading off a lot of the vacuuum tubes too, since many of them had thoriated filaments, which was common at that time. I think early xenon bulbs had thorium coated electrodes too) So, what does this prove? Nothing. (other than perhaps I have too much spare time on my hands)  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 05-12-2014 10:55 PM                        90V and 3A - yikes! That cell drank 270 watts of DC power: slightly more than today's solid state ones. As for the radiation, uranium sulphate was used as a yellow tinting dye for silent prints in the 1920s. On a tour of the British Film Institute as a student in the '90s, the then curator held a Geiger meter over a reel of 1920s nitrate print. The thing went berserk! Apparently the level of radioactivity in a reel that has been treated with this stuff is only just below the threshold at which special handling and storage precautions are needed.  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 05-12-2014 11:36 PM                     quote: Leo Enticknap 90V and 3A - yikes! That cell drank 270 watts of DC power Leo, I think the "3-A" was simply the tube designation, and did not stand for 3 amps. While the old photo-tubes required a high voltage potential, I think the actual current they handled was only a few milli-amps. Interesting what you said about the nitrate. I recently dumped a bunch of nitrate film found at another old theater, all of it in very bad shape. (see photo) Next time I come across some I'll have to check it with my geiger-meter now that you've piqued my curiousity about the possiblility of it being slightly radioactive. Last fall I uncovered a stash of nitrate film reels in a (very) damp theater basement. This picture is typical of the condition most of the cans were found in: The reels of themselves were pretty much one gelatinous mass. The emulsion was almost completely eaten away. It was impossible to unspool even a few inches of film to try & identify it, as it was just all gooey & stuck together. -jc-  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 05-13-2014 12:09 AM                        Yup - sadly, those are well and truly beyond hope. I'm a little surprised: the chemistry experts who've researched this stuff seem to be agreed that heat kills nitrate more than humidity (whereas with triacetate, it's the opposite), and so nitrate stored in a damp but relatively cool environment should stand a better chance of survival than the other way round: hence the reason something like 90% of the Dawson City collection was not only salvageable, but in reasonably good shape. Though in this case, if the theater basement had heating plant in it or some other reason why the temperature was high, that would explain it.  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 05-15-2014 07:06 AM                     The Dawson City stash was used as fill in a disused swimming pool as I recall.. who would have even attempted an outdoor pool in Dawson, anyway??? I've been to "The Town of Dawson City"; the few weeks it would be warm enough to use a pool, anyone nuts enough to try swimming would be swarmed by billions of blood sucking insects. I can easily understand why it was abandoned and filled in. Dawson has permafrost so anything buried would be basically kept frozen until dug up again.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.