Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Service Tech Opinions on 70mm Norelco Ad (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Service Tech Opinions on 70mm Norelco Ad
Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 05-07-2014 09:45 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having a little back and forth exchange on the 16mm Film-talk concerning how many projections a Print can endure before it's not presentable in a Theater Venue any longer. Obviously a number of Factors play into this.(i.e. Competent Projectionist,Equipment,Gate/Pad Pressure,Cleanliness of Transport/and Print,etc.

I'm not sure which Model Norelco this ad would be referring to at the Pantages back then; Possibly a DP70. What I would like to hear from Service Techs up here that have worked on these Norelco's is this a Realistic situation in a general 70mm Booth.
Since Norelco was promoting the sale of this model Projector; I'm sure everything was treated with kid gloves concerning Print Handling, Projector Setup,Maintainence,etc. I IMHO feel that this is an exception to the Rule. I believe the Projector/s supplied to the Pantages for this Showing weren't your off the assembly line Projector that would be going to General Movie Houses.

I think these were probably meticulously hand assembled units that were indexed and blueprinted beyond anything the average Theater would receive. After all our reputation is at stake here also.I haven't heard that much from Projectionists on these machines as to how gentle they are on Film,reliability,etc.

Your Feedback on this Ad would be most informative and appreciated, Thanks!....S.M.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2014 11:06 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
758 passes from a print is actually very easy to do on a LOT of different equipment. For example the GCC Northpark put more passes on 70mm prints than that with Century JJs and never had a mark on them.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 05-07-2014 11:41 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Found this Neat Video of A DP70 used in a Home Venue. I'm still not sure if this would have been the Model used back then at the PANTAGES for the "SPARTACUS" Showing. The video covers both 35mm and the conversion to 70mm. I've heard both sides of the coin regarding NORELCO Projectors. I know like any other make your going to have your PROs and Cons. Since I have never ran one I can't critize or Defend its Engineering and Reliability. It looks impressive in the Video... (about 9+ minutes long)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY00JZhfR9M

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-08-2014 12:04 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's Ben Wales in the video, isn't it?

When Kodak launched triacetate stock in 1948, they published an SMPTE Journal article, which included the results of research in which they tried to establish the typical life expectancy of a release print in a normal, suburban theater situation. The problem with pre-triacetate safety stocks (diacetate, butyrate and propionate, mainly) was that they were a lot more fragile and expensive than nitrate. These tests were designed to convince studios and theater chains that the new safety stock was as good as nitrate in terms of tensile strength and durability.

My memory is hazy and I don't have a copy of the article immediately to hand (nor a subscription to look at the PDF online), but if I remember correctly, a nitrate print was considered to be capable of withstanding 500-600 projections in what were then considered to be normal projection booth and handling conditions.

But of course a prestige theater in downtown Hollywood is not exactly normal booth and film handling conditions: it's going to have better maintained equipment and probably better trained personnel than a second-run suburban house. It's not really the model of projector that's the biggest determination of print life, but rather the quality of maintenance and film handling in the booth, and how a print is used. A print that plays three bookings a month is probably going to wear out a lot more quickly than one which stays in the same booth, playing four times a day for many months.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-08-2014 12:19 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw SPATACUS at the Pantages in Hollywood back in early 1961 from way in the back of a deeply sloped stadium seat theatre. The movie was great but the viewing experience in this theatre from where we sat was not a good way to see films. The Pantages as I remember was a very huge house.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-08-2014 12:56 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When "Titanic" opened up in 1997, I ran a print through a P35GPS Christie where when that one print left our complex in July of 1998, it never obtain a scratch during the 7 month run on that print .. and my splices had never any hinge issues or signs of weakening.

We didn't have FG, but had Kelmars, mounted on our AW3R platters to keep the print clean as possible.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 05-08-2014 05:42 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
35mm Smokey and the Bandit played 5x a day for 14 months. It was not a new print when we got it. Color faded and the sprocket holes were longer but very watchable at the end.Century SA and Autowind 2. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-08-2014 05:42 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If this was early '60s (61?) it would have been DP-70s. I think the last ones were built in 1967 and there was a couple of years or so overlap in production between those and the first DP-75s.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 05-08-2014 06:28 AM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A projectionist at Colonial Williamsburg once told me they got 2000 runs on a 70mm print of "Story of a Patriot" before discarding it. That was on JJs.

I heard they recently ordered 6 new 70mm prints. So if true, 70 will be alive there for some time to come.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-08-2014 06:49 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The DP70 was certainly one of the most gentle projectors ever made. The film had no aggressive turns. The tension could be maintained better than others (continuously adjustable gate tension and the clutches were better than most). It also used large sprockets which distributed any tension over more perforations than most of the others.

That said, I've never had to replace a print and at the Uptown in DC, we ran Century JJs and our typical run would be many hundreds of shows...400-500 was not unusual. We wore out Teccon mag heads there from so many runs.

Of the machines I personally ran, I would put the Simplex 35/70 as the harshest of them due to its gate design (or lack there of). Anyone that knows that projector knows it truly was just the PR1014 with wider sprockets and spacers to adapt the standard 35mm parts to a 70mm system. It is caught between 65 and 70mm as the sprockets and gate/trap are not 70mm wide as such it has piss-poor lateral stability and the intermittent shoes rub across tracks 2 and 5 on the mag tracks. This will leave marks/wear on those two tracks only. In fact, I've seen, in some theatres, where they were worn OFF. One had to space the shoe off the sprocket, like a pad roller to avoid aggressive wear.

Compare that to the Norelco where the intermittent used an actual pad roller and the sprocket had a significant wrap around it to distribute the tension.

The Century JJ is like walking in a mine field...if you know where the mines are, you can navigate around them. I always found that the JJ did better on 35mm than the SA too.

I don't have experience with the Ballantyne but the Walt Disney Company did/does. They used them pretty much exclusively and they definitely would get more than 700 passes on a print. They were/are used on their attractions at their theme parks (though many/most have now been replaced by digital).

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 05-08-2014 08:36 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We averaged 3500+ passes of 35mm film at Planet Ocean Museum in Miami. Ballantyne Pro with VKF sprockets and a film cabinet with compressed air film cleaning. We could do more but the image color was a change issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 05-08-2014 01:02 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Pantages theatre engagement of "Spartacus" was a Roadshow run. Which ran one or two shows a day and the first 70MM engagement for the theatre. During that time frame the theatre was a two man Union booth. Those Norelco's were installed in 1960 and lasted till 1977 when the theatre closed as a movie theatre and was reopened for Broadway touring shows. They were removed during that time and during the mid 1990's we reinstalled 4 Norelcos back into the theatre. I worked for Pacific Theatres during that time.

On the seating for this engagement, Kubrick had the theatre reduce the seating capacity by curtaining off parts of the auditorium on the far sides and in the rear balcony. The theatre went from 2700 seats to 1512 seats for this engagement.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 05-08-2014 01:19 PM      Profile for Steve Matz   Email Steve Matz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very Interesting responses; I guess my skepticism comes from back when all of our indoor theaters in the 50's and 60's were using E7 Simplex's that had been installed as far back as 1941 at the FOX Theater. The 2 projectionists that I knew well enough to know they were Competent Old School Licensed Electricians and could fix anything in their Booths use to tell me on any long run feature that went 12 weeks or longer; they usually asked for a replacement Print after around 7 or 8 weeks.

I know these Projectors were well maintained as I remember being in 2 of these theater's Booths and they were immaculate. The Projectors,Lamphouses,Rectifiers,etc. still looking like they were brand-new.

So if you know your Projectionist is more than competent and keeps a clean projector/equipment,print,etc., is conscious about using minimal Gate/pad pressure short of Flutter,etc. Why would these prints have to be replaced in roughly a 2 month period with an average number of 6 showings a day/night. I know from talking to other old school Projectionists that ran numerous brands of Projectors back then always said Simplex(super,E7,XL straight gate) were rougher on film than other Brands. Even the NORELCO AD said the average life of a 35mm Print was 200 or so Projections. If Simplex's were that rough on Film why were there so many out there and the company surviving while others folded in the 50's. I know going to a curved gate improved the later XL's but I hear more Cons than Pros on them being Rougher on Film than any of the Other Mfgers Equipment...

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 05-08-2014 02:09 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Simplex were and are not any rougher on film than other projectors. There are a lot of XL's out there grossly out of adjustment. Film tension way too tight, etc.

The projectionists you mention, good as they were did not usually get a lot of experience on other brands being rooted in one booth or smallish geographical area so what they were citing were opinions gathered from talking to other operators. Anecdotal at best.

A lot of operators loved the Motiograph because it was an intricate device, but proof of the pudding...

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 05-08-2014 02:10 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What years are you talking about for those 12 week runs and what size city and was it a single screen?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.