Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Porthole for projection booth (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Porthole for projection booth
James Collins
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Lowville, n. y.
Registered: Mar 2013


 - posted 04-13-2013 01:50 PM      Profile for James Collins   Email James Collins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello,

I recently built a projection booth in my basement. I had a local carpenter build the booth. Its basically like a small closet in my basement.

I have a porthole in the front to project through and a side door for entrance.

Initally i had a glass door in the front. It was put in by a carpenter. And i would project through that. And it worked pretty good but it didnt look right so i had another carpenter sort of finish the booth off. One thing i should say this was a regular glass door, and it worked good with no reflections, if i remember correctly. He took out the glass door, put in a little square window to project out of and put the door on the side.

I like everything about the booth except when i turn my projector on i get a reflection on the back wall of the booth. Like when i turn the projector lamp on some of the light from the lamp was getting projected onto the back wall of my booth. There is actually two squares being projected onto the back of the booth. I think i get to square because i have two pieces of glass for my porthole.

Initially i had the glass straight. Because i thought i could angle the projector to supress light reflections. But when my carpenter had framed the glass and put it in i got reflections. I then had my carpenter take the porthole out. And when he framed it the second time he put the glass in at a 2 degree angle. Because i had read about angling the glass online. I had my carpenter fit the porthole in with out nailing it in so i could check the reflections.

I still got the two squares of light being projected on the back wall. And we tried putting the glass in so the angle angled toward my screen. Tried it angling toward the opposite way. And even tried increasing and decreasing the angle. Because the porthole hadn't been completely installed yet. But no matter what we did i still got reflections.

This was the second time my carpenter had put in the porthole. So i told him to just put the porthole in with the glass at a 2 degree angle.

So my questions are regarding the reflections on the inside of my booth. I wondered if it would effect my projected image, like i thought if part of the light from the projector is being reflected back as it goes through each panel of glass. Wouldnt at least the brightness of the projected image be affected? Would i run into focusing problem?. I showed a 16mm print through the porthole and it was hard to focus, but i dont know if that was because of the print.

I had bought the glass online from a computer optics company out in california. I payed about a $150.00 for two panes, at two different thicknesses. The guy i bought them from said the different thicknesses would help with sound proofing. The guy i bought the glass from new i wanted it for a projection booth. I believe it was white glass. I looked online and i think someone reccommended this company to me. But did i get the wrong glass. Like maybe it should be anti-reflective glass?

I thought about either living with the porthole how it is or having redone. But this would be the third time redoing it. One other reason i might have it redone is because i can't get to the glass to clean it. Like i can clean the inside and outside of the booth but not in the middle.

Anyway any info or help would be appreciated.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 04-13-2013 02:30 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would angle a single pane of glass to the thickness of the wall (I assume 4" studs) and forget using a second pane. The top should be closer to the booth and the bottom closer to the viewing room. That will put the reflections on the floor.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 04-13-2013 02:38 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You need antireflective glass. Any framing shop should be able to source it. It is used in 2mm gauge for professional, non-reflective frame surface glass.

Professional cinemas very often need fire protection glass - (e.g. Pyran). But for your private home cinema, normal antireflective glass without fire protective features is sufficient.

You will be surprised about the low amount of reflection with glass types like Amiran or Mirogard.

Please make clear you need glass with a antireflection COATING ('interference coating')- not surface etched/grated glass like on cheap antireflective frames. The latter also reduces reflection somewhat, but creates a very blurred image.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-reflective_coating

I recently received a piece of high-class antireflective coated mirogard 17cm*12cm for around 15US$ incl. shipping from an internet framing service.

Putting it in at an angle is still useful to retain contrast and image sharpness - even the best antireflective glas will still create a reflection on the lens or the back of your booth - just a very dim one. With a non-angled port glas, you will have multiple reflections between port glas and lens, and reduced sharpness and contrast. Even a small angle will have it bounce out of the optical axis.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Elliott
Master Film Handler

Posts: 497
From: Port Orange, Fl USA
Registered: Oct 2006


 - posted 04-13-2013 02:42 PM      Profile for Joe Elliott   Email Joe Elliott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even with optical glass, with anti-reflective coating, the glass reflects some image. I was told the angle of the glass was primarily so that the reflection hits the floor, instead of the back wall. This is because in many booths you have projectors across from each other, and the reflection would shine out the opposing projectors port hole. For the most part, you can't get rid of the reflection.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-13-2013 02:43 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You're always going to get some reflections. The trick is to adjust the glass so that they go somewhere that doesn't re-reflect back into the viewing area, preferably onto the floor or low on the wall behind the projector.

I've never seen a booth that didn't have at least a little bit of reflection unless there was no glass at all. If you want to keep the seating area free of noise from the booth you have to put glass in the port. The only compromise would be to make the port hole as small as possible.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-19-2013 02:15 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
....and get the projector lens as close to the port glass as possible. Also, tilting the glass isn't only a matter of stopping reflections into the room, but to eliminate the possibility of the reflections bouncing back to hit the lens which can cause a secondary image on the screen. The lens and the port glass should never be parallel.

As has been said, you will always get reflections back into the room; in one of our locations, we needed to paint the back wall flat-black because the reflection hit the original light-colored wall and would actually bounce light off it and out into the theatre and impact the screen. That location unfortunately had no port but a full wall-to-wall window as the "port," AND it was not titlted -- very problematic. In that booth, ANY light at all in the booth would be "seen" by the screen, hence, painting everything black was necessary as well as the use only of little winkie lights rather than more normal booth lights.

Rule-of-thumb -- when you have the ability to design your booth from scratch (a great advantage), always construct the projection port to be ONLY as large as necessary to pass the pojection beam uninhibited. If you are faced with an existing port as most of us are, I have have been known to mask the existing port down with black poster-board to only slightly larger than the largest projection beam, i.e., the scope width and the 1.37 height.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-19-2013 02:20 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Love the poster board idea/Rechnicolor 3D.

We built a cinema of 8 screens in 1974. The booths were very tight. I decided to use the large window concept: 40"w x 28" high. The projector was positioned to allow access and then afterward, the light beam and the view port were marked. Masonite was cut to fit with the holes made 1" wider than the beam. Perfect. Painted both sides black. louis

 |  IP: Logged

James Collins
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Lowville, n. y.
Registered: Mar 2013


 - posted 07-25-2013 11:40 AM      Profile for James Collins   Email James Collins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello,

Just a follow up to my porthole questions. As my porthole is right now, i have no way to get to the inside of the glass to clean it.

I have a little door on the inside of the porthole that the wood do to humidity wont close. So i might have my carpenter adjust the wood and hinge. But i might have him redo the porthole so i would be able to get to the inside of the glass to clean it.

So i wondered is this very important. Like over months or years is it esential to be able to clean the glass. Or could i get by with just being able to clean the outside?

Also if i have it redone, could the carpenter make it sound proof by lets say framing the glass in rubber or some material to help with sound proofing?

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Jay Glaus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 123
From: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Registered: Dec 2010


 - posted 07-25-2013 11:48 AM      Profile for Jay Glaus   Author's Homepage   Email Jay Glaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with what everyone is saying, you'll still get a little reflection with AR glass, so I would paint the back wall flat black and that should ensure optimum picture quality.

Always thought of putting a theater set up in my basement, never got around to doing it yet though.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-25-2013 12:22 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the space between the panes isn't perfectly isolated, dust and moisture might find its way in over the years, as it always does.

Why are you using two panes of glass if I may ask? Is it because of sound proofing? Wouldn't be a single pane of double glass be much better then?

Also, you sure want to put some isolation between the frame and the glass to avoid nasty vibrations.

There was a theater around here that was built back in the 70s. It had some badly isolated glass panes in the back of the auditorium. No idea what the deal was, but someone must have thought it was awesome back then. Besides creating nasty sound reflections, those glass panes also had the tendency to vibrate in their metal frames. You definitely want to avoid that.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 07-25-2013 01:03 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In my 25 years in the business I have never worked a theatre that DIDN'T have reflections. I've had them on the back wall, on the floor and on the ceiling. What's the problem?

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-25-2013 01:24 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert E. Allen
In my 25 years in the business I have never worked a theatre that DIDN'T have reflections. I've had them on the back wall, on the floor and on the ceiling. What's the problem?
As long as they don't end up on your screen, there is no problem. Glass that's 100% transmissive and 0% reflective hasn't been invented yet.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 07-25-2013 03:07 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Double pane glass does not work well for ports as you get reflections between the sheets and you will have trouble controlling where the reflections end up. They need to be at an angle to each other. There is also the issue of coated glass. I've never seen it in double pane where all surfaces are coated.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-25-2013 10:17 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All of our double-pain ports are coated on both sides of both pieces of glass. The glass is angled opposite form each other such that one reflects up, the other down to prevent re-reflection. We used them almost exclusively for film cinemas to keep the projector noise out of the theatres. For digital cinema...we are moving back to single panes. While a digital projector makes a bit of noise...it is a steady state noise that doesn't have splices and such causing changes and such (let alone a proper changeover booth).

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 07-28-2013 03:13 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What I'm going to present here may seem rather odd, but I had no problems with the results:

At a six plex cinema that I used to work at, we had Kelmar port frames with the removable, port glass panes that had the magnetic striping around the glass to hold the pane within the framework of the port assembly.

If anybody had any experience with these Kelmar units, they are great, but something can go wrong when the glass falls out and shatters - like if someone throws something at the port window from inside of the auditorium, or the window just wasn't replace securely in the frame.

One day, the latter occurred when an employee decided to clean the glass and didn't get it back into the frame and hit the floor and shattered (regular temper pane glass being full of lead).

Thus, we had an open port to deal with with projector noise entering down into the auditorium.

What I did, to 'baffle' the noise from going out into the auditorium was to create such a baffle..a double baffle assembly.

I use sheets of cardboard that I cut out with the front baffle being the width of the scope image and the height of the flat image, and the inside baffle, which would be lot smaller that would mount on the inside part of the port assembly, was cut out just the width of the light image for both scope and flat.

With this home made sound baffle assembly, I was able to contain the machine noise within the booth and none was heard out in the auditorium.

I did get the window section replaced so I didn't need my baffle assembly, but kept these two pieces just in case another window gets broken.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.