Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Acoustic simulation software - recommendations

   
Author Topic: Acoustic simulation software - recommendations
Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 03-26-2012 08:13 PM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have an auditorium which has fairly unintelligible dialogue due to high levels of echo. While I could follow and recommend the standard techniques of sound absorption panels and traps, I thought it would be interesting to try an acoustic simulation program to see how and where these panels and traps would be most effective. Does anyone here use this type of software and does anyone know of any freeware type of software that might be available?

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: Boulder Creek, CA.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-26-2012 09:56 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
EASE is only about $900 for a minimum 2 user license. Might be a good investment if you're going to be doing more than 1 remodel and wont be bringing in outside techs.
Otherwise there's PAMM which is open source as is CARA. Both are largely unsupported and have a steep learning curve.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 03-27-2012 12:26 AM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regarding EASE, yes it may be good, but looking for open source or freeware.

PAMM looks more like it is geared for something other than audio acoustics for theatre sound.

And, CARA looks good; however, the sources I checked indicated that it was to be paid for.

Thanks though.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: Boulder Creek, CA.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-27-2012 01:02 AM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CARA is free, I have it.
It's the training and hardware they want to sell you.

 |  IP: Logged

Chuck McGregor
Film Handler

Posts: 47
From: Bremen, ME, USA
Registered: Mar 2012


 - posted 03-27-2012 06:38 AM      Profile for Chuck McGregor   Email Chuck McGregor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have not run the software let alone used CARA, but in looking at their information, here are a couple of observations. The program seems obviously aimed at small (home theater) rooms. As well, it seems geared toward discrete listener locations rather than seating areas in a program like EASE.

As to the accuracy of the program's predictions, I compared the directivity data used for its calculations to that of EASE. It appears to be at least two orders of magnitude lower in resolution. Imagine your car odmeter turning over once every 10 miles versus once every 1/10 mile. It would be interesting to compare reverberation predictions using the same room data.

Certainly no harm in seeing what it does, but personally I wouldn't spend too much money on treatments for a commercial cinema based on its results.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: Boulder Creek, CA.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-27-2012 09:37 AM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's good to know, Chuck.
I've only ever used it in my house, not a commercial installation. I should've pointed that out earlier as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 03-27-2012 07:01 PM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you Chuck.

FYI: I really enjoyed reading your contribution to the topic in the digital cinema forum: topic: do high frequency drivers decay over time. This was one of the most interesting posts I have read for quite some time.

I have an older version od Smaart which I could use to measure acoustics. I thought about fabricating some type of sound absorption panel which I could move around the auditorium to measure the its effects on the environment; however, this is just not practical.

 |  IP: Logged

Chuck McGregor
Film Handler

Posts: 47
From: Bremen, ME, USA
Registered: Mar 2012


 - posted 03-27-2012 10:01 PM      Profile for Chuck McGregor   Email Chuck McGregor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What you can do is the reverse. Rather than place "test" absorption, see if you can locate where where untoward sound reflections are coming from, i.e where you might want to put it. Cup your ears or use a high tech device called a megaphone (difficult to construct I know [Big Grin] ) to "directionalize" your ear(s). You were going to do it by listening anyway [Smile]

Listening truly objectively and quantitatively to sound takes practice and has the huge, added benefit over any test instrument of instant, qualitative analysis - your perception. That is a function no test instrument has.

Thank you guys for the kind words.

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 03-28-2012 02:12 AM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had a lot of luck with treating/ deadening the backstage areas with black tissue faced fiberglass ductliner and cheacking that the horns are actually correctly installed and angled down into the middle, back 2/3 of the seating areas. I have even swapped in 60 x 40 horns, replacing the typical 90 x 40 horns now typically found in cinemas.

By creating a quiet enviroment for the speakers to operate from, and killing off the earliest reflections that bounce around backstage that have the biggest effect on intelligibility.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-28-2012 03:41 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Temp fix is to EQ the center channel by dropping off the lows so the voice can be heard better...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.