Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Print arrives wrapped in Saran wrap (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Print arrives wrapped in Saran wrap
Fred L West
Film Handler

Posts: 24
From: Concrete, Wa USA
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 03-02-2012 08:07 AM      Profile for Fred L West   Email Fred L West   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our print for the weekend arrived with reel one on a complete reel with the rest having just the center of a reel and wrapped in Saran wrap. This is a new never shown print with some with tail out and other head out. I had to take apart spare reel and carefully unwrap print and fit into center peace without it falling apart. All went well but just never seen or heard of such a thing? Very new to all this with just 2 years in the booth, is this common.

Fred

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-02-2012 08:25 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The plastic center is called a "core". This is the way reels come from the lab, and the way archives store prints.

If this was a commercial release, you should call the distributor and have them send you reels so that you can break down the print at the end of the run. Many independent/foreign films come on cores.

Your theatre should buy a metal 2K split reel, not to be confused with those plastic snap together reel side flanges often misnamed a split reel. The real metal split reels screw together and are designed for easy winding film on and off of cores.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 03-02-2012 12:55 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I never experienced that in my 25 years in the booth Fred. Mitch gave you some good advise. Thanks again for the tour of your place. Nice to hear from you.

 |  IP: Logged

David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:05 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never seen a film arrive on reels, always on cores.

Does this mean that in the USA from when the film leaves the lab on cores, to when it arrives at your booth on reels that there is a processing step somewhere where films get transferred from cores to reels?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:10 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Common practice in the US is to ship release prints on reels instead of cores. I assume the transfer from lab cores to reels is done at the various depots.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:20 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The reel "sides" are snapped on to the core at the depots. The "reels" that were just on cores, and rapped with plastic sound like they care new reels from the lab.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:40 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For many years now in Australia, new prints have been delivered wrapped in heat-shrunk plastic film and on cores in boxes.

There is nothing wrong with this method, it saves on shipping and, as the print should never be used unless on house spools, eliminates the issue of 'shipping damaged' spools.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:45 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
True, it was pretty standard that most theatres had a 'split reel' for such print arrivals when arrived on cores only...

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Registered: Apr 2009


 - posted 03-02-2012 04:55 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the twelve years of projecting and around 800 films I have only come across a handfull of prints ever arriving on reels. New prints also come in cores and sealed where as others just on the cores.

As Ian has said the cost of frieght comes into it as well so a good split reel is a must.

Never a problem with them arriving this way....works fine.

Graham.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 03-02-2012 05:07 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Even rep prints in mainstream distribution down under come on cores, stacked in cardboard boxes.

Makes shipping easy but I shudder to think of a courier dropping one in a puddle one day because it does expose the films to shipping damage. The plastic wrap disappears after the first screening and the plastic cans that they used to come in went west about 10 years ago except for product that's come from a handful of international labs.

And of course you get booth-monkeys who don't put the cardboard separators back between the stacked spools...

In fact, excluding the odd 70mm that nobody's remembered to junk, I can only think of three prints circulated on reels in trunks by Deluxe Media Logistics.

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Registered: Apr 2009


 - posted 03-02-2012 05:53 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In fact its so unusual to have a film arrive in reels I took a photo of one.
 -
Poor old "Lawrence of Arabia" this print had seen better days, however I should add "Doctor Zhivago" arrived soon after this and the print is not "to bad" after screeing Doctor Zhivago we sent it of to Aussie to live. [Smile]

Graham.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 03-02-2012 06:16 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Australian print of Lawrence is trashed and gets about in four cardboard boxes. Can't ever forgive Columbia for sending the Australian 70mm print to Korea and letting them subtitle it.

A pity doubly because they're the sort of reels we prefer to see [Razz]

 -

By the way, Graham, was Doctor Zhivago the Chapel Distribution print?

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 03-02-2012 06:22 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One good thing about getting a new film on cores wrapped in plastic is the film stands a greater chance of being super clean.

Often the old film cans are filthy with decades old dust and cardboard debris which jumps all over fresh new film.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 03-02-2012 06:59 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jock Blakley
The plastic wrap disappears after the first screening and the plastic cans that they used to come in went west about 10 years ago except for product that's come from a handful of international labs.

And of course you get booth-monkeys who don't put the cardboard separators back between the stacked spools...

Really sorry to learn of this - getting rid of cans is really poor practice and is guaranteed to dramatically shorten print life. I know prints are often shipped from the Lab to the Distributor shrink-wrapped in plastic with cardboard separators - but that's only because the shrink wrap supports the spooled film rolls, and this method is only supposed to be used for the initial Lab-to-Distributor shipment (I know this because a Print Manager told me). Once the shrink-wrap is removed, the spooled rolls must be transferred to cans for subsequent shipping to theatres.

Cardboard separators not only cannot protect the film, but offer very little mechanical support in transit - one shudders to think what condition prints are in where shipped from one theatre to another.

By way of contrast, there are the high-quality cans and cases that e.g. Deluxe London use - no reason why you shouldn't receive prints exactly the same way.

 |  IP: Logged

Graham Ritchie
Film Handler

Posts: 54
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Registered: Apr 2009


 - posted 03-02-2012 08:48 PM      Profile for Graham Ritchie   Email Graham Ritchie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jock

I think the local NZ distributor for the David Lean films was Cinevista however he was tied up with Sony Pictures.

We were asked to dispatch "Doctor Zhivago" to Melbourne. I cant remember the address the film went to. The records were at the cinema when we closed down after 20 years for good last November, "make way for more shops" we did run the David Lean films Sept-Oct just before we closed.

Of the four David Lean films, Doctor Zhivago although far from being perfect was ok. I did ask why new prints were not made with the film distributor, his reply was that the demand was such it was not financially worth it, which is a pity.

Jock that print could be still in Melbourne somewhere and would be worth getting. I last watched this film when I was young back in the 60s and watching again was a real joy....twice [Smile] I think this is where only the "look" of a film presentation wins out.

 -
here is a screen shot taken from the projection room might give you an idea of its condition
 -

Graham.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.