Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » DIs and "show prints"

   
Author Topic: DIs and "show prints"
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2011 12:29 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Subject says it. What is a "show print" in the context of a feature that was finished with a digital intermediate (which would be the majority these days)?

Historically, of course, an EK print or show print would be printed off of the camera negative and would have handmade changeover cues. They still have handmade (Clint Phare style) cues, which implies that they are not printed off of the same internegatives that are used for release prints, but I am confused as to what the other differences (if any) actually are? Is it just a print with no lab splices or other defects, and/or is the preprint material better than what is typically used?

And what is the current process for DIs? Does the film recorder output to an interpostive from which multiple printing negatives are made, or are multiple printing negatives made directly by the film recorder? In principle, the latter method should be more expensive and offer better quality. Finally, how many prints can be made from a single printing negative before quality begins to suffer?

 |  IP: Logged

Simon Wyss
Film Handler

Posts: 80
From: Basel, BS, Switzerland
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 10-26-2011 12:54 PM      Profile for Simon Wyss   Email Simon Wyss   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Iʼd say Show Print means the same as Projection Print, i. e. a positive with adequate contrast and density for front projection.

You can have either internegative or interpositive, the difference lies mainly in the stock employed and its treatment. Smaller releases tend to go LED/LASER-internegative, bigger with LED/LASER-interpositives, a handful, and contact dupe negs from them. These are sent to the copy centers around the globe. Cue marks will be punched into the dupe negs. Hundreds of release prints can be struck from a single internegative since the action is continuous. There are the so-called Rock-ʻnʼ-Roll printers that allow to expose both ways, the interneg remaining laced up.

I think this is one major point motion-picture film technology entirely failed to improve upon: image steadiness. The industry never cared about better quality on the screens which eventually contributed to everybodyʼs changeover, if I may say so, to video. IMAX always had superior steadiness due to register pins with the rolling-loop apparel. Now theyʼre killing themselves all the same.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.