my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » How much light do you need for 70mm?

Author Topic: How much light do you need for 70mm? Paul Gordon Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 580 From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2005 posted 06-29-2011 12:12 PM                        Hey all, There is a cinema uphere thinking of switching to 35mm/70mm projectors so they can host our 70mm festival. My question is how much more light do they need to project 70mm 5-perf? Right now they are getting 18-19Fl on screen in scope.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-29-2011 12:18 PM                     The spec is identical for 35mm or 70mm. 16fL center brightness with white light/open gate (no film but the shutter running). -Steve  |  IP: Logged Paul Gordon Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 580 From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2005 posted 06-29-2011 12:43 PM                        Ok.... but if their getting 18-19fl with 35mm with their lamphouses will they get the same with 70mm? does the gate size and lens not matter much? I just want to know if they will need to upgrade their lamphouses.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-29-2011 02:41 PM                     Often, one gets MORE light with 70mm than with 35mm. One may need to reset the lamphouse for 70mm since the working distance changes (and/or use a beam spreader). -Steve  |  IP: Logged Paul Gordon Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 580 From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Registered: Aug 2005 posted 06-29-2011 02:45 PM                        Good to know! Thanks -pg  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-29-2011 02:49 PM                        I always wondered about that Steve -- doesn't a beam spreader, by taking the same amount of light and spreading it over a larger area, of necessity drop the light level in that larger area? An anamorphic lens does that, albeit on the other end of the aperture, but with the same results of overall brightness being reduced, no?  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 06-29-2011 03:07 PM                     The light from the lamp is spread over a larger aperture, but the light from that (larger) aperture has be be spread out less to cover the screen, if that makes sense. The screen size is what really matters. Of course, other factors can come into it, such as the aperture of the 70mm ones compared to the 35mm ones, and whether or not a beam spreader is fitted.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-29-2011 04:25 PM                     I very rarely use the beam spreader as it eats light most modern lamphouses will have no isuue defocusing the beam to cover the 70mm apperture and the large f number the big apperture and large lens will work well with more overall light  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 06-30-2011 10:42 AM                        Typically a JJ Century with Schneider lenses and a Strong Ultra 80: 31 ft/lm on 70mm 26 ft/lm on scope 18 ft/lm on 1.85. All else being equal, I would expect the same ratio. remember 70mm has other advantages other than grain: reduced jump/weave and better color saturation. louis  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-30-2011 12:05 PM                        Does anyone really believe in the use of the beam spreader? The concept makes sense to me, but I have talked with a number of people who should know and they all have said that it either doesn't improve anything or that it actually makes illumination worse than simply defocusing the lamphouse. Is its purpose simply to enable easy conversion to and from 70mm and eliminate having to re-align the lamp when changing formats? It would be great if a lamphouse could be designed with motorized reflector adjustments that could be pre-set to recall various formats (35mm optical, 35mm silent or mag, and 70mm mag) at the push of a button, but I doubt that any theatre owner would ever pay what such a thing would cost.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-30-2011 01:05 PM                     My experience with Beam Spreaders varies...some did it better than others. I want to say my best experience was with Christie's on the K series lamphouses. I've had mixed results on Strong but if you get everything aligned right...one can yield more light with the beam spreader. You have to get your working distances right though. Those that merely focus/defocus lamps are doing it wrong and likely have other artifacts that show up that they don't recognize. The reflector has one sweet spot for the arc to be and the cone of light the system puts out is fixed. You want to get the working distance right for that cone of light to just be big enough when the light hits the aperture. For 70mm, the working distance is going to be notably closer (shorter) than for 35mm. When one focuses/defocuses the arc you will get black holes in the middle or stray rings on the side and softer pictures due to double imaging (multiple light beams are now going through the same point). It is never as ideal. A beam spreader can go a long way to making the difference between 35mm and 70mm minimal. Frank, with respect to a beam spreader...draw yourself a rectangle with the proportions of 2.2:1. Find the center of that rectangle and take a compass and draw a circle such that circle just touches each corner of the rectangle. All parts of your circle that are outside of the rectangle are wasted light. Now do the same thing (draw the same sized rectangle) but this time draw an ellipsoidal around the rectangle such that the ellipse is 2.2 times as wide as it is tall but also just touches the corners of your rectangle. Which has more wasted light? The ellipse will have more on the sides but less on the top/bottom for a net improvement. However, the beam spreader is not a perfect lens and some are less perfect than others so you get some losses just by going through it. Again, if everything is not set up properly, (and the lens is not designed properly), it will not be an improvement. On the anamorphic side...you must take into account the size of the aperture/film. A 1.85 picture will have LESS light than a Scope picture using an anamorphic lens with a common-height screen. In fact, the Scope image should be about 20% brighter since there is 20% LESS overall magnification going on (even taking into account that the anamorphic is magnifying the width by 2). This presumes the lamp is not refocused or moved...one can often eek just a little more light out of 1.85 if the spot is tightened just a bit (or better yet, lamphouse moved back). -Steve  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 06-30-2011 08:28 PM                     quote: Steve Guttag This presumes the lamp is not refocused or moved...one can often eek just a little more light out of 1.85 if the spot is tightened just a bit Why some Christie SLC console had that autofocus with the reflector - to focus in the bulb a bit more for flat and defocus the bulb for scope. I do the same with my SLC consoles when projecting flat: to lightly focus in the bulb for a brighter picture and defocus the bulb back for scope. I have to leave myself a note to defocus when going back to scope when a print changes. Otherwise, I have a gradual hot spot in the middle of my scope image and the film leaving the gate is a bit on the hot side instead of a nice luke warm touch when the bulb is focused in correct proportion to the screen - which is an even field of light across the entire surface of the screen. One can do this with any 35mm lamphouse or console when changing lens formats to get the best light out per each format.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-30-2011 08:42 PM                     Get a Eprad with a bendable mirror  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 06-30-2011 09:43 PM                        I have NEVER seen a beam spreader that helped. All of them shifted the color temperature as well. Steve is right, there is only one good place for the bulb. Moving the entire lamphouse forward/backward yielded a larger/smaller spot on the gate; forward for 70mm. Louis  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.