my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Lens sizes

Author Topic: Lens sizes Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 06-06-2010 11:57 AM                     I am installing a new and larger screen. I cannot get the lens calculators on the site to download properly. Here are the numbers: scope image: 12'x29' flat image: 12'x22' throw: 60.5' If someone could look up the lens sizes for me I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!  |  IP: Logged Mike Croaro Master Film Handler Posts: 394 From: Millbrae, CA Registered: Apr 2005 posted 06-06-2010 12:36 PM                     Hi Tom: 12 X 22/29 seems like a nice size screen for a 60' throw. Not too big, not too small. I am curious, what was the size of the old screen? Mike  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-06-2010 12:42 PM                     Oh stop...this isn't hard math. You have constant height so that will be easier since you only need to know the height of the screen...in your case, 12' So you need the ratio of the height of the aperture and the height of the screen...in your case .446"/12' (keep your units straight too). The equation sets up like this: .446"/12' *60.5' = 2.249" (note the throw feet divided out the screen height feet leaving us in inches. Multiply that by 25.4mm/" to get 57.11mm You will need to use a 55mm. The actual image size will be 12.46' x 23'. This isn't too bad as you will only have about 3" of spill on your masking to hide the shadow of the plate...the side masking can be adjusted as necessary too. For scope...same equation but now use .690" for the height of the aperture...you get 88.36mm. Thus you must use an 85mm (I don't think they have 87.5mm, off the top of my head. Your final scope size will be 12.47' x 29.81'. Which again is a pretty decent fit. Please note, not all lenses are exactly their marked focal lengths so you should allow for variances. Scope attachments interact with their prime lenses to make them ABOUT 2X in magnification Schnieder anamorphs are notorious for over expanding. ISCOs are a bit more uniform but the 4-element anamorphic lenses from both tend to have more interaction. Steve  |  IP: Logged Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 06-06-2010 01:37 PM                     The current screen is about 11x21 and we mask down for scope. It doesn't make much sense though since the auditorium is about 32 feet wide. Bad design. Thanks for the help.  |  IP: Logged Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 06-06-2010 03:17 PM                     Steve, Can you explain how this equation works? I've never seen it before. Where does 25.4mm per inch come from?  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 06-06-2010 03:22 PM                        It's just a unit conversion; there are 25.4 mm in one inch.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-06-2010 04:58 PM                     (actual size/desired size) * Throw = Focal Length As Robert said, 25.4mm/inch is just a conversion factor. That is why I said...keep your units and they will divide out as needed. So, regardless of the numbers it is (inch/foot)*foot*(mm/inch). The inches and feet divide out leaving you with millimeters. Calculating lens sizes on flat screens is one of the easier things to do by hand. When you have a curved screen it is a bit more tricky because it is often shorter to the sides than the center so you have to allow for that. Somewhere, I wrote a program (DOS) that allowed one to enter the screen's radius and it would tell you the limiting dimensions (how tall the image was on the edges of the screen). The Schneider lens program does a decent enough job nowadays that one can get a decent visualization as to what is happening on a flat or curved screen. Another good thing about the Schneider program is that it knows about the expansion factor of the anamorphic lenses and how they relate to their lenses. It can be downloaded here Steve  |  IP: Logged Mike Croaro Master Film Handler Posts: 394 From: Millbrae, CA Registered: Apr 2005 posted 06-06-2010 09:25 PM                     Hi Tom: Thanks for the old screen size. The 12 X 29 scope wil be a much better fit for the auditiroum. Mike  |  IP: Logged Martin Brooks Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 900 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 06-06-2010 10:37 PM                        FW=DA F=Focal Length of the lens in inches W=Width of the screen in feet D=Distance from the screen in feet A=Aperture in inches. So F=DA/W (I'm pretty sure that's it anyway.)  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-07-2010 12:03 AM                     The formula is as old as the industry one only needs to look in any cameron's or richichardson's book  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 06-07-2010 12:32 PM                     quote: Gordon McLeod one only needs to look in any cameron's or richichardson's book (...and I've got a 1922 and a 1943 copy of James R. Cameron's, "Motion Picture Projection".)  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.