Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Excessive film grain

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Excessive film grain

Author

Topic: Excessive film grain

John Hegel
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 166
From: Lake Mills, Iowa
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 04-15-2010 08:12 PM

I'm having problems with excessive film grain showing up on screen.

We just got done running Green Zone and it looked as if we were projecting a weak broadcast analog signal. Since the first of the year Avatar has been our only print that has been perfect in my opinion. Is it the labs fault, or something I'm doing wrong?

Equipment:

Ballantyne Pro 35

Strong Super Lume-X

| IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 04-15-2010 08:26 PM

Seeing grain tells me you are in focus and have plenty of light.
I would suggest you may have to much light but if Avatar looked good then I would put the blame on film stock.
What is your screen size & what lamp are you running.

| IP: Logged

Matt Johnston
Film Handler

Posts: 37
From: Fort Myers, FL
Registered: Oct 2009

posted 04-15-2010 08:39 PM

Grain has to do with the ISO that the feature was filmed at.

Basically the grain is what reacts with the light. Large grain will be during dark scenes.

All 2 or 3 prints of Green Zone at our location were this way FWIW.

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 04-15-2010 09:03 PM

grain size is often an "artistic choice" made by the dop during tiing and pre production and is part of the "package"

| IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 04-15-2010 09:20 PM

I worked on H2, and that was shot on super 16 for that "grainy look"

| IP: Logged

John Hegel
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 166
From: Lake Mills, Iowa
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 04-16-2010 12:35 AM

The screen is 30' with 2000 watts of light.

| IP: Logged

Jonathan Smith
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 201
From: Youngstown, OH
Registered: Jan 2010

posted 04-16-2010 09:39 AM

It is amazing to me that people equate "grain" with "noise."

In my opinion, digital noise looks far far far far worse. The two can hide each other though. . .

I remember "X-Files" gave even analog standard-def. TV compression trouble when they started shooting it all on the now-defunct Vision 800T film stock (it's even worse now with the excessive digital compression they use).

Grain did the softness of "Date Night" good though, and hid the "digital jaggies" pretty well.

I knew it was digital because of all the blown highlights, but the grain softened the harshness of digital down.

Of course, now that nearly 100% of movies are finished digitally via a 2K digital intermediate (2,000 LINES not watts), digital noise is a part of all movies. Again, the copying process helps to hide JPEG jaggies and pixelation after 3 generations of copying though.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.