Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » subwoofer output on CP50/cat 560

   
Author Topic: subwoofer output on CP50/cat 560
Jeff Else
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: Detroit, MI, USA
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted 02-22-2010 10:48 PM      Profile for Jeff Else   Email Jeff Else   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
where does the subwoofer output to with a cat 560 installed? are backpane modifications necessary?

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-22-2010 11:26 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For these purposes, it's the same as a Cat. 160. I don't remember the pinout, but it should be in the later version of the CP50 block diagram.

You could also look in the DA20 manual under connecting a DA20 to a CP200 section and look for the optical sub out pin.

The Cat. 560 was not documented for use in the CP50 as there were simply too many upgrades and mods required to make it worthwhile, as the CP50 design was 16 years old by the time SR.D was introduced.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-23-2010 08:42 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The subwoofer output is the same for the Cat 560 as for the Cat 160. There is a link on the Cat 560 to select CP50 or CP200 (P6). The output on the CP50 is "B11" on the edge connector which turns into the "C" output on the "output to surround adapter."

Be forewarned if you plan to use the Cat 560 to pick up Right surrounds and EQ for Left-Surrounds...it WILL invert phase on the Left surrounds at its input.

If you find an early DA10 manual...there are actually instructions for the DA10/CP50 combination as well as a reference to a board that Dolby never produced, the Cat 442, I believe, for connecting the DA10 to the CP50. Sam would know if that board ever got out of the "Artist's conception" stage. We made a board (506T) to allow the CP50 work with the digitals (all three and in any combination).

Steve

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-23-2010 09:39 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve has a better recall of this than I do. I don't believe the board was ever built as when we added it up, SR cards,
3 Cat. No. 64's, 517, better power supply, etc.,
the upgrades far exceeded the value of the CP50.

If all is needed is optical subwoofer output, I have several 160's in my old stock and would be happy to sell one cheap, or trade, whatever.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-23-2010 01:09 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I never really agreed with Dolby's "too much" position on the CP50. You didn't need to really change the Cat 64s or possibly the Cat 114 (if you had a "C" you were okay). It really came down to the Cat 560 and Cat 517...and even the Cat 517 could be skipped...if you knew what you were doing.

When we developed the 506T...it started as just a means to hook up a DA10 or DTS-6...but it evolved into a multiformat selector and also the ability to upgrade as much or as little as one wanted. We even put in the ability to sense if a Cat 280 was installed and adjust the gain to match digital, accordingly. I still have (mostly) unstuffed boards from the last run.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-23-2010 02:09 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
..if you knew what you were doing is the operative phrase.

Now we are going to renew an argument we started over 17 years ago? Memory loss is a good thing in some cases.

You never give up Mr. Steve. Mostly I like it.

35mm Magnetic is on its way back accompanying film 3D I hear.
[Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-23-2010 04:27 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just remember to send a cue to the Smellovision module! Louis

 |  IP: Logged

William T. Parr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 823
From: Cedar Park, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-23-2010 04:34 PM      Profile for William T. Parr   Email William T. Parr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How cheap would you sell a 160 card for? I need one since I have a CP 50 that is missing the cat 82 link card.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-23-2010 05:40 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the problems, early on, was that folks were already aghast at the price of the DA10/Cat699 when this all started. We got into the mobile digital rack business to get sales. Hence, we had to figure out how to make most of the installed base that we serviced work with mobile digital racks.

The "506T" was the beginning of that...the first one was quick and dirty, but did the job.:

 -

I don't know if we have the "mule" anymore for this one...we still have one or two of the raw boards...I believe only one customer got it and it was a condition of sale. This is a case where they already had the SR cards for their CP50s and wanted to float a DA10/20 between three theatres and one theatre had a CP55 and two had CP50s.

That board evolved into 12 revisions (though not all were ever made or even prototyped).

The final result was this one:

 -

Which is still mounted to our "mule" CP50. It allowed you to chose what updates you had in your CP50 (it would work with the Cat 160/560, 517,117, Cat280s or SRA5...you merely programmed it via links for what you had and it routed the rest. One could have both DTS and Dolby digital hooked up at the same time too. It also gave a pink-noise input (lower-left) so you could EQ all 6-channels without removing any cards from the CP50. We also added a "hearing impaired" output that was pre-fader, pre-eq with a center weighting. I want to say the interest kind of fell away as this one came out but we sold a few.

As Sam noted, there were upgrades to be done for the CP50...BUT if you had a late model CP50 (Cat 64Bs, Cat 114C)...then with the Cat 517/560 upgrade, you actually had a better sounding unit than a CP55 or CP65 with better VCAs for a fraction of the cost.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-23-2010 05:41 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You want a 110L if you just want a link card to pass the signal thru. Those are cheaper than a 160.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-23-2010 07:17 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cat. 64B's came out after the CP50 ceased production so they needed to be obtained somewhere.

I'm sure I'm wrong and Steve will point it out if I am.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-23-2010 08:29 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have the questionable distinction of having bought the very last (?) CP-50 ever made. Will check next time I'm in the theatre. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-23-2010 09:07 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can GUARANTEE that the CP50 was issued with Cat 64Bs prior to discontinuation (sorry Sam). I want to say that the last year of CP50s had 64Bs. The first CP50s with Cat 64Bs we took delivery of where in the fall of 1984. The CP55 came out in 1985 and always had Cat 64Bs. We got one of the first CP55s too...with the odd Cat 243 that had one move a wire around to set the wake up format...not the nice and neat wire of later years where it was all in a row...no you had to move this blue wire to the resistor you wanted!

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

William T. Parr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 823
From: Cedar Park, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-24-2010 11:09 PM      Profile for William T. Parr   Email William T. Parr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sam,

I would prefer to upgrade my CP 50 to the 160 card.

Love to also get at least 1 of those boards from Steve. I would care less if is was a naked board as long I could Identify the parts that went on it.
Would also like to get another Cat 113C card for the other CP 50 so they could both interface with a pulse style automation.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-25-2010 12:58 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
William,

I'm sure we are breaking some sort of rule here but contact me at my  - address so we can discuss. I do have 113C's as well.

Congrats on keeping your CP50 tip top.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.