Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Film guard usage (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Film guard usage
Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 02:34 AM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We run a midnight Rockey horror once a week. We own the print unfortunately after a long time of running this print it has seen a lot of wear / scratches. Whats the best way to use film guard to restore old prints like this? If there is a good way to get out / reduce large scratches that someone knows then I will probably be investing in a bottle. The upper management wont buy it for us but our Rockey print might need that tlc that they don't understand.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 05:52 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like to think of Filmgaurd as preventive maintenance. It helps you keep the print in good condition from the get go. It can really help old prints as well, but once they've been significantly damaged you'll never be able to make them look like new no matter what you do. Some of the dirt is literally baked on there and emulsion side scratches are there for good as are deep base side scratches. It will help your print look and run better than it does, but sad to say the scratches are probably there for life.

This is also why I don't wait until "prints get dirty" to run the cleaner. I don't allow them to get dirty in the first place.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 11:48 AM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The print has been dirty / scratched since I got their. I am just looking for a way to make it better then it is. I am sure it is dirty as all sin since its been run every Saturday night for 5 years or so.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-09-2010 07:55 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While it's true what Joe says, FG will make it look significantly better than it does right now...it just won't make it look new, just new-ish.

There are plenty of other FG threads here describing the best way to put FG on your prints. Just do a search. Good luck.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 08:31 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Virtually all the prints I run are "well used" to say the least. There is lots of dirt and many small scratches. Some prints are terrible to look at but I know if I send for a new print I'll get one that's just as bad and sometimes worse.

Every print I run gets Film-Guard. Every time. It does help rejuvenate and clean up old, dirty prints. It can make a big difference.

However, you still have to remember that there are times when even Film-Guard won't work.

If the scratches are deep.
If the scratches disturb the emulsion.
If there are lots of scratches in the soundtrack area.
If there is lots of ground-in dirt.

In cases like these, Film-Guard will lessen the appearance of scratches and dirt but it will not eliminate them. Even on prints that can be rejuvenated, it still takes a couple-three runs for the effect to be really noticeable.

If the film is really damaged, even Film-Guard will not help.

No matter how hard you try, you just can't polish a turd. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 08:42 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Randy.

Very true and sound advice.

..except for this..
quote: Randy Stankey
No matter how hard you try, you just can't polish a turd.
You CAN polish a turd- but it still looks like shit [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-09-2010 08:53 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mythbusters disproved that one. They used feces to make a type of hikaru dorodango (normally a high-gloss ball made out of mud). The ball they made one ball that was 106 and another with 183 gloss units (where high gloss is anything 70 or higher).

So you CAN polish a turd. It'll still smell like one, though.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 08:59 PM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Randy Stankey
No matter how hard you try, you just can't polish a turd.
As for polishing a turd
Polishing a turd
Mythbusters proved that one.

And I remember reading on the film guard website that it can be used to help clean up a print.
When I read the film guard web page
I saw this
quote: Jeff Winkler

Witness/Paramount Pictures
I haven't been in the projection booth for a long time now, but I've seen the results of what polyestar film is capable of doing to the equipment as well as our prints. Every week we must send out replacement prints due to brain wraps and tossed prints. This is a problem throughout the exhibition industry.

After knowing Mr. Miller for many years, I recently asked him if it was possible to perform some repair work on a few repertory prints of ours. He accepted and performed miracles with a solution I have learned is becoming available to the public in the very near future. I screened a couple of those prints prior to and after his rejuvenation work and can attest this solution he is using is nothing short of incredible. These prints I would've sent to junking were now perfectly acceptable for playdates.

Mr. Miller has been using this cleaning product for several years in public theaters and I have always noticed the superior level of quality at his complexes, but up until recently I had no idea he was using such a cleaner. I have been so impressed with the prints that come out of his theater, we have been specifically saving those prints for repertory use. I wish Mr. Miller the best of luck with his product and hope the industry as a whole takes the initiative and uses it. It will improve the movie going experience for everyone and keep the customers coming back.

Basically what I am asking is what are the best techniques to do repair work on film.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 09:24 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is a turd still a turd if you squash it into a ball? I say that if you form a turd into a ball it is no longer a turd. It would then be a shitball but not a turd.
Yes, you can polish a shitball but you still can not polish a turd because once you form a turd into a shitball it forever loses its turdness.

Repairing prints is best left up to the labs. With the equipment you have at the theater level, your options are rather limited.

You can clean a print with various and sundry chemical preparations.
You can splice a print back into some semblance of original order.
You can patch broken sprocket holes with various methods.

But, once a print is damaged, there is usually no way to restore it to original condition at the theater level.

You should even consider fingerprints to be permanent damage!
Yes, the oil and dirt from your fingerprints can actually absorb into the emulsion, leaving a virtually permanent mark. There are some chemicals that can be used to remove fingerprints but they are usually pretty nasty.

If you send a print back to the lab it can be run through a special machine to "rewash" it and remove much of the dirt and even heal some scratches. But, once film is cut, it can never be "uncut." It can only be respliced.
Once film is scratched, it can never be "unscratched." You can only hide the damage.

If film is scratched down to the emulsion, that's all she wrote!
Scratching away the emulsion removes part of the image on the film. There is no way to restore it.

The simplest way to "repair" film is to never damage it in the first place.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 09:46 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael,

I'll need some answers from your specifics to give the best advice.

1. Is this print plattered or running reel to reel?

2. If reel to reel, is it 20 minute reels or 60 minute reels?

3. If platter, does this print get moved off of the platter each week?

4. If platter, what brand of platter are you working with?

5. Do you have a Christie or Kelmar "media" cleaning machine like is pictured here?

To get the optimum results, I will need to know the answers to those questions. More may be forthcoming depending on the answers.

By the way, assuming you run that print once a week for 5 years, that is only about 250 passes. That is nothing. I've ran prints over 1500 passes before with NO hint of any deterioration, scratches or dirt buildup of any sort. The trick, as the guys above are trying to tell you, is that corrective actions are never as effective as preventive actions.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 10:11 PM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
@ Brad
I know its been at least 3 to 5 years with the same print.

1. The print is run from a platter.
2. N/a
3. The print each week gets moved to a couple sheets of cardboard and lexan spread between the platter legs under the very platter. Then a few pieces of cardboard are put on top.
4. The platter is a strong alpha 3 deck with a micro switch brain.
5. We own a Kelmar cleaner

The theater is the same one every week.
Ballantyne pro 35 with a tu2000 turret. Ballantyne sound head and a dts head.

Its got some deep emulsion scratches. I don't know when they happened. I know they will never be fixed.

@ Joe
That is what makes film cool its a picture not a pixel. Its an image transferred from stock to stock with light noting can replicate that.

This is the projector that it runs through every Saturday

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 11:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You've got everything working against you here.

You have a platter that does not wind tight. You have a print that was permitted to get dirty. This means every week when you move it for storage, you are putting more and more scratches in it (little "scuff marks" and such...the lines were a threading error). Because the Strong platters don't wind tight, the film is permitted to slip on itself during this move. To top it off, your projector puts more wear on a print than a Century, Christie, Cinemeccanica, Kinoton, etc due to the soundhead design.

But wait there's more.

When you go to clean this print, that craptacular platter has no backtension of any sort, so any cleaning attempts on your part will take twice as many passes to do the same job as if you were running a Christie platter.

That being said, this is what I would do given the circumstances.

First off, use Film-Tech or Kelmar brand media ONLY. If it doesn't have the little embossed "brick" pattern on the surface, don't use it! You will create MORE scratches if you use that type of media on a dirty print because the dirt has nowhere to go. (The dirt on Film-Tech and Kelmar media can drop in the "grooves" of the media to protect the print from getting scratched.)

Next, makeup your film cleaner at least 24 hours before, by soaking the media down and letting it sit out. 48 hours before would be preferred. The reason is because when you are dealing with an old print like this being fed via a Strong platter, you do not want to over-saturate the print. You want the media barely damp for this purpose.

The first pass will do nothing for cleaning. It never does. The first pass is all about lubricating the print to protect it. The actual "cleaning" process starts with the second pass. Save the media pads after this first pass. Store the entire cleaner (or if you have to strip the media rolls off of it) in a ziploc baggie. They make large ones big enough for the entire cleaner.

The second week will be your second pass. Re-use the same stretch of media and make sure you put the same roll on the top spindle of the film cleaner that you did the week before. Don't mix and match the emulsion vs. the base side cleaning pads. You will NOT be adding any FilmGuard before this second show.

Starting with the third week you will be on a monthly change-out:

Week 1 - New media pads, saturated down 48 hours ahead of time (at least 24 hours before the show).

Week 2 - Same pads rewound so you are using the same stretch of media. Do not resaturate the pads.

Week 3 - Same pads rewound so you are using the same stretch of media. Do not resaturate the pads.

Week 4 - Same pads rewound so you are using the same stretch of media. Do not resaturate the pads.

Repeat steps 1-4 for weeks 5-8 and so forth.

I believe RHPS takes either 5 foot or 5.5 foot length rolls of media. If you are ONLY using FilmGuard on your RHPS print, one box of media and one bottle of FilmGuard will last you a couple of years. Hand-wind 5.5 feet of media onto an empty core and run those. If you run the full 16 feet of media on the rolls as they come from the manufacturer, the other 10 feet will absorb FilmGuard unnecessarily, emptying your bottle faster.

Remember, load the pads DRY onto the cleaner. Wind the takeup core a full 3 turns past bare minimum. THEN push the sprayer nozzle up against the dry pads to saturate them. If you wet the pads before loading them onto the cleaner, you run the risk of the tape loosening on the takeup shafts and if you hit some sprocket damage or a bad splice (both applicable on most RHPS prints), you could actually end up pulling the media free and causing it to unravel during the show. If you load them up DRY before wetting them down, that won't happen.

Also, see if you can go buy yourself two thick (half inch) pieces of masonite and have it cut into a circle 3.5 feet in diameter. (Make sure it is a smooth cut, not one hand-done with a jigsaw.) Then have the center cut out enough to clear the brain of the platter (I'm guessing 10-12 inches) and then drill out a couple of holes with a 1/2 inch drill for your two center ring pegs. This way you will be creating yourself a sturdy and only mildly bendable "donut" to run the print onto and off of during the show. This will help prevent more scratches in the future as you keep physically picking up and moving that dirty print, because you will be picking up and moving the "donuts" with the film sitting on top. Remember, that dirt is abrasive against the next layer of film!

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 01-09-2010 11:24 PM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the advice.
What if I used my rewind table with a kelmar bracket mounted to it. I can bet no one has ever went over the print and checked any of the splices since its been made. Could I run it from a set of reels through the cleaner and then build it back up for starters to have some back tension.
Also I am sure we can leave rocky on the platter I will talk to my boss about it that way we are not always moving it around.

And strong platters suck. How hard is it to convert the permanently mounted brain platters to ones with removable brains.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-09-2010 11:42 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You can user your rewind bench to clean a print but do not run the film too fast. I'd say never go above "30" on the speed dial. If you use big reels to wind the film you should even slow it down when you get near the end of the reel.

If you go too fast it will scratch the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-10-2010 12:29 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Given the potential for scratching on the bench, coupled with the fact that the most effective cleaning is MANY passes, not just a few on the bench, I would still stick with the above guidelines. If however you can not move it during the week, that would definitely be a plus.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.