Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Placing screen speakers with bass cabine on botton and HF on top behind screen

   
Author Topic: Placing screen speakers with bass cabine on botton and HF on top behind screen
Marin Zorica
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 12-07-2009 09:36 AM      Profile for Marin Zorica   Email Marin Zorica   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I having one cinema, a really bad room situation, 32meter long, 11 meter width....so 3:1 which is really bad in aspect of cinema acustic, more prefered for live music and so, also secound thing is that first row of seats is about 10m from screen because there is 1m height stage. In fact that wouldn't be any kind of problem as I need to worry as nobody will invest in rebuilding of house, now we wanted to upgrade sound, found some KCS S-2500, it has 47cm deep cabinet for low freq, and mounted on top HF driver....the thing is that I can put it behind a screen because i have only 42cm space between back wall and screen. But, i do have some space below the screen, there is some black curtain which is in parralel with screen and from it to back wall there is enought space to put speakers, so I was think....that is too low for speakers, and also that curtain has higher amount attenution of high frequencies, so maybe to put LF cabinet down, and HF driver to get it mount upp in 2/3 from top of screen as usual?

Don't know if anybody did do anything like it? I did hear for some system that HF drivers are mounted on top of screen and so, but newer had a chance to hear how that is working.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 12-07-2009 12:13 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the acoustics are bad (live) enough, you will be better to put the LF low and mount the HF above the screen, with the idea of aiming toward the floor, thus avoiding any reflections from the rear wall.

Yes, this is bad form, but better than the alternatives. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 12-07-2009 03:00 PM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Better still, get a different smaller horn! For the best results in a room like yours use a 60 x 40 style like web page
It is also possible to build a box that would fit within your backstage.

One more thing I would suggest is a backstage acoustic treatment.

Louis is on the money as usual regarding how important correct installation of the horn is. To me it is more important than brand, ie a great speaker will sound just as crap as a no name one if they are both installed badly!

 |  IP: Logged

Marin Zorica
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 12-07-2009 06:26 PM      Profile for Marin Zorica   Email Marin Zorica   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well....I was think same as you two did, also was again to check room, is not bad at all it seems on first, well reverbation time is quite small is you count size of it, so less than 1 second or so, on stage there is a some flatter echo, because of ceiling, and normally back wall would be treated with apsorber or something I will need to get "In" financial situation.

On other hand, is not possible to put HF horn above screen, because screen frame top is about 10cm from ceiling and in that space curtain console is mounted. So probably horn will get on 2/3 of from top of screen as usual. To bad this isn't to be BI amplification, because than I could compensate, because when HF is mounted on top, there will be bit more away than LF unit which is on bottom from seats.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-08-2009 10:43 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AMC did that for years with some of their Torus suck screens

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-08-2009 12:50 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
about 15 years ago, I walked into a room with a "suck" screen. It looked and sounded horrible. I told the local tech that I wasn't going to fuck with it. I cleaned the optics and set dolby levels and walked away. LJ fucked up with this idea. He must have been in bed with the vampire

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 12-08-2009 03:06 PM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marin Zorica
and normally back wall would be treated with apsorber
Just making it clear that I am recommending back stage behind the screen not the back wall. Its the early reflections that cause the biggest intelligibility issues.

The right horn correctly installed could have very few issues with the back wall reflections.

There are speakers that can fit within 40 cm stage depth perhaps its better to wait or save for some?

What is currently backstage? perhaps its better to refurbish?

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-08-2009 08:02 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you must place the bins below the screen, there is a very light weight material that you can use which is fairly transparant acoustically and it is has excellent light absorbing characteristics well -- any image spill on this stuff literally becomes almost invisible. It is black satin. We found it much better in that respect even than the traditional velour for the masking surround, it's much easier to work with because of its light weight and as I said, sound will pass right thru it practically unscathed, especially low end stuff. You can get Black Satin at Rose Brand in NY/NJ.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-09-2009 09:09 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, I misspoke....it's black VELVET, not satin.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.