Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Designs for accumulator

   
Author Topic: Designs for accumulator
Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 10-22-2009 12:52 AM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone have any good designs for a interlock film accumulator. If so could you post it.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 10-22-2009 01:04 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kelmar has a good accumulator being of two rollers spaced three feet apart and an arm with a roller at the end along with another roller at the pivot point. The weight of the arm would keep the film taut between the two rollers.

STRONG has an accumulator that looks like an enlarged version of the "yo-yo" roller assembly on their platters. It has three rollers on the lower half and 5 rollers on top so the film weaves inbetween these rollers. The lower roller assembly would travel up between two rods and that lower assembly had enough weight to keep the film taut.

We had a home-made accumulator system composed, once again of two side rollers spaced about 3 feet apart with a roller on a bracket that is weighted in the middle and also suspended by a chain connected to the ceiling. the weight kept the film taut between the two rollers.

But, the slickest way to do accumulating is with using the Christie AW3 platter's takeup arm as the accumulator. If you have two AW3's close enough together and in direct sight of one another, along with extra rollers on top of the tower, this works extremely well and you don't have rollers all over the ceiling, nor any external accumulators needed.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 10-22-2009 09:23 AM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have 2 simplex 35's with out sync motors and strong platters. I am looking for interlock them who ever was their before had like an 5 foot wooden board that would hang off another board on the wall. Thanks for the info I think we have a strong one for one of our other projectors.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-22-2009 10:02 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the theaters I used to work at had an interesting arrangement for a film accumulator. It was the Cinemark 8-plex in Summerville, SC, just outside of Charleston.

They took a Strong accumulator like Monte mentions and mounted it to a piece of heavy plywood. Then they took an old wheel rim from a truck or something like that and welded a piece of 2 inch iron pipe to it so as to make a vertical post. The wheel rim at the bottom was a weighted base. The accumulator on the board was fastened to the upright post with some U-bolts.

You could use a two-wheeled dolly and move the accumulator anywhere you needed it. The only caveat would be that you have to be careful to align the accumulator with the film path or you could get scratches or the film could jump the track.

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-22-2009 01:08 PM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One very easy interlock accumulator is this
 -

You can use three wall rollers. Place two rollers in a straight path about 50 cm appart(approximately 2 feet) and take one roller appart and place two light metal plates vertical to work as counterweights on the roller. You will need to place something to keep the rollers' bearings operating and not have the roller rubbing without rolling against the film. In any case you can place two rollers on a straight line in all your paths and have one or two counterweighted rollers with plates since you can easily move them.

Demetris

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-22-2009 01:38 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This was the way I did it as we had a cable tray run the length of the projection room. Not the best picture but all I have now

I used a double roller drop to reduce the amount of arm travel. For a 3 screen run I had two of these...

 -

 -

 -

 -

The platters, Kinoton st 200, were fitted with two addional rollers to send the film to the cable tray and on to the next projector.

The film cleaner with Film Guard was simply hooked onto the platter column.

Hope this is of interest.

Regards.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-22-2009 02:58 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I prefer the Speco Accumulators. They are heavy and don't move around in operation but easily movable between screens or locations.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 10-22-2009 04:48 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Michael Voiland
We have 2 simplex 35's with out sync motors and strong platters
If they're induction motors, it will be tough to do interlock then since the motors are not running at the same speed being that induction motors are more sensitive to line voltage than line frequency as with sync motors.

You will then have to figure out which motor runs the slowest and maybe put a variac on the faster motor to slow it down to the slowest motor. Otherwise, you're gonna have BIG problems, esp in the middle of your show travel.

I saw one triplex that had Centurys with induction motors. His homemade accumulator was a good dozen rollers - half which were on a slider assembly where the film was like in a film roller bin - going all through the rollers in a vertical fashion like the STRONG accumulator.

When he would do his interlock, he'd lace through all the rollers and when show begins, he'd watch the lower rollers on this contraption. If one roller began to rise to almost halfway point, he would flip the film off that roller and let the next roller continue on until it began to raise .. an so forth.

It was a very nerve wracking experience since the operator had to watch this all the time.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 10-22-2009 05:51 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Neumade accumulator has a switch to shut down the automation if there's a too much tension at start.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-22-2009 09:08 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte...all of my initial interlocks were with async motors. Most of the projectors with these motors also have a motor brake...an appropriately sized foam rubber square (from packing material that might be laying about) shoved between the brake level and the case would cause the brake to apply enough pressure to the "faster" motor to effectively event them out.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Voiland
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 219
From: Naperville, IL US
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 10-23-2009 01:37 AM      Profile for Michael Voiland   Email Michael Voiland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We currently have a 2 screen interlock that runs at close to the same speed we start it about halfway down our strong accumulator and it is about 6 inches from the top at the end. I am trying to think of a good way to do a 4 screen interlock for twilight.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-23-2009 01:49 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Thread between those two with the film running in the OTHER direction and start with the accumulator almost at the very top. This way it will drop during the show rather than tighten up to the point it starts tearing things off the walls.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.